Fuzzy-TOPSIS Analysis for Standard Alternative Selection: A Multiple Attribute Decision-Making Method and Application for Small and Medium Manufacturing Enterprises (SMEs)

Nazmus Sakib; Md. Shakil; Kazi Arif-Uz-Zaman

Fuzzy-TOPSIS Analysis for Standard Alternative Selection: A Multiple Attribute Decision-Making Method and Application for Small and Medium Manufacturing Enterprises (SMEs)

Nazmus Sakib * §

Contact

Md. Shakil ‡

Contact

Kazi Arif-Uz-Zaman ¶

Contact

§ Khulna University of Engineering & Technology (KUET)

‡ Khulna University of Engineering and Technology

¶ Khulna University of Engineering & Technology

Fuzzy-TOPSIS Analysis for Standard Alternative Selection: A Multiple Attribute Decision-Making Method and Application for Small and Medium Manufacturing Enterprises (SMEs)

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

UUDM5

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant

This converted HTML version may contain rendering inconsistencies. Please refer to the PDF for the authoritative version, or click here to provide feedback.

Abstract

In the era of industrialization small and medium enterprises (SMEs) play great role in world economy. The developed as well as developing countries are being benefited from SMEs which holds a strong position creating new employment and helping in the development and supporting in local production. The job creation element of SMEs enables many poor people to feel more secure, assuring that they have a stable job to survive .But the actual situation and overall working condition of SME’s is very dreadful especially due to limitation of resources, facilities and techniques. This paper compares different performance criteria on three different SME and indicates a standard benchmark SME using fuzzy-TOPSIS analysis. The proposed method states optimum SME working condition among different performance variables with different values. Qualitative variables with multiple criteria problems have been analyzed here. As human assessment is uncertain and often subjective for qualitative characteristics, the alternatives’ characteristics are expressed in linguistic terms. These linguistic terms are then evaluated through integrated fuzzy-TOPSIS method to produce numerical value which is the performance rating for each characteristic of SME alternatives. According to the fuzzy rule, the alternative with the highest value is chosen as the standard and other variables of alternatives are compared with the standard. The advantage of using fuzzy-TOPSIS is that it distinguishes benefit and cost category criteria and selects solution that is closed to the positive ideal solutions and far from the negative ideal solutions. Moreover, the paper offers a new method of identifying best SME using integrated fuzzy-TOPSIS and recommends optimum performance variables.

References

4 Cites in Article

Reference Format

1. Gülçin Büyüközkan,Tijen Ertay,Cengiz Kahraman,Da Ruan (2004). Determining the importance weights for the design requirements in the house of quality using the fuzzy analytic network approach. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 19(5), 443-461.
CrossRef DOI
2. S. Ghodsypour,C. O'brien (1998). A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming. International Journal of Production Economics, 56-57, 199-212.
CrossRef DOI
3. G. Buyukozkan,G. Cifci (2012). A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 3000-3011.
4.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Nazmus Sakib, Md. Shakil, Kazi Arif-Uz-Zaman. 2014. "Fuzzy-TOPSIS Analysis for Standard Alternative Selection: A Multiple Attribute Decision-Making Method and Application for Small and Medium Manufacturing Enterprises (SMEs)". Global Journal of Research in Engineering - G: Industrial Engineering GJRE-G Volume 13 (GJRE Volume 13 Issue 40 (G5)).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJRE Volume 13 Issue 40 (G5)

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjre

Print ISSN 0975-5861

e-ISSN 2249-4596

Keywords

fuzzy multi-criteria problem TOPSIS

Classification

GJRE-G Classification FOR Code: 091005

290502

Submission ReceivedDecember 9, 2012
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 5, 2013
Published September 23, 2013

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

September 23, 2013

Language

English

Order Article Reprint

Experience in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 103

Country: Bangladesh

Subject: Global Journal of Research in Engineering - G: Industrial Engineering

Authors: Nazmus Sakib, Md. Shakil, Kazi Arif-Uz-Zaman (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 490

Total Views (Real + Logic): 1914

Total Downloads (simulated): 114

Publish Date: 2013 09, Wed

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 41 views
Month 2: 61 views
Month 3: 31 views
Month 4: 63 views
Month 5: 33 views
Month 6: 34 views
Month 7: 48 views
Month 8: 52 views
Month 9: 52 views
Month 10: 45 views
Month 11: 42 views
Month 12: 21 views
Month 13: 37 views
Month 14: 33 views
Month 15: 32 views
Month 16: 34 views
Month 17: 29 views
Month 18: 39 views
Month 19: 16 views
Month 20: 21 views
Month 21: 13 views
Month 22: 38 views
Month 23: 23 views
Month 24: 30 views
Month 25: 31 views
Month 26: 20 views
Month 27: 37 views
Month 28: 12 views
Month 29: 42 views
Month 30: 22 views
Month 31: 22 views
Month 32: 30 views
Month 33: 36 views
Month 34: 40 views
Month 35: 29 views
Month 36: 25 views
Month 37: 44 views
Month 38: 30 views
Month 39: 35 views
Month 40: 18 views
Month 41: 42 views
Month 42: 39 views
Month 43: 31 views
Month 44: 31 views
Month 45: 23 views
Month 46: 25 views
Month 47: 34 views
Month 48: 26 views
Month 49: 32 views
Month 50: 40 views
Month 51: 23 views
Month 52: 38 views
Month 53: 25 views
Month 54: 31 views
Month 55: 27 views
Month 56: 23 views
Month 57: 34 views
Month 58: 29 views
Month 59: 43 views
Month 60: 36 views
Month 61: 24 views
Month 62: 23 views
Month 63: 17 views
Month 64: 21 views
Month 65: 31 views
Month 66: 21 views
Month 67: 16 views
Month 68: 32 views
Month 69: 33 views
Month 70: 36 views
Month 71: 29 views
Month 72: 33 views
Month 73: 27 views
Month 74: 17 views
Month 75: 19 views
Month 76: 27 views
Month 77: 42 views
Month 78: 35 views
Month 79: 48 views
Month 80: 49 views
Month 81: 21 views
Month 82: 36 views
Month 83: 25 views
Month 84: 15 views
Month 85: 26 views
Month 86: 29 views
Month 87: 33 views
Month 88: 30 views
Month 89: 42 views
Month 90: 44 views
Month 91: 40 views
Month 92: 15 views
Month 93: 17 views
Month 94: 31 views
Month 95: 17 views
Month 96: 14 views
Month 97: 24 views
Month 98: 42 views
Month 99: 40 views
Month 100: 32 views
Month 101: 34 views
Month 102: 37 views
Month 103: 29 views
Month 104: 15 views
Month 105: 27 views
Month 106: 21 views
Month 107: 15 views
Month 108: 32 views
Month 109: 12 views
Month 110: 20 views
Month 111: 46 views
Month 112: 32 views
Month 113: 34 views
Month 114: 29 views
Month 115: 33 views
Month 116: 33 views
Month 117: 33 views
Month 118: 33 views
Month 119: 39 views
Month 120: 46 views
Month 121: 15 views
Month 122: 47 views
Month 123: 29 views
Month 124: 32 views
Month 125: 31 views
Month 126: 32 views
Month 127: 26 views
Month 128: 37 views
Month 129: 47 views
Month 130: 43 views
Month 131: 21 views
Month 132: 32 views
Month 133: 34 views
Month 134: 22 views
Month 135: 46 views
Month 136: 34 views
Month 137: 40 views
Month 138: 35 views
Month 139: 16 views
Month 140: 31 views
Month 141: 35 views
Month 142: 16 views
Month 143: 26 views
Month 144: 33 views
Month 145: 37 views
Month 146: 49 views
Month 147: 34 views
Month 148: 48 views
Month 149: 53 views
Month 150: 32 views
Month 151: 16 views
Month 152: 25 views
Month 153: 35 views
Month 154: 23 views
Month 155: 26 views
Month 156: 17 views
Month 157: 24 views
Month 158: 54 views

Total Views: 1.9K

Total Downloads: 114

All Trends