Genotype-Environment (G X E) Interaction for Body Weights for Kuchi Chicken Ecotype of Tanzania Reared Under Intensive and Extensive Management

Dr. J. Lwelamira
Dr. J. Lwelamira
Institute of Rural Development Planning

Send Message

To: Author

Genotype-Environment (G X E) Interaction for Body Weights for Kuchi Chicken Ecotype of Tanzania Reared Under Intensive and Extensive Management

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

4M4X7

Genotype-Environment (G X E) Interaction for Body Weights for Kuchi Chicken Ecotype of Tanzania Reared Under Intensive and Extensive Management Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
Font Type
Font Size
Font Size
Bedground

Abstract

This study was carried out with the aim of determining magnitude of G x E interaction for body weights for Kuchi chicken ecotype of Tanzania reared under intensive (on-station) and extensive (freerange) management systems. Body weight was assessed at 8 (Bwt8), 12(Bwt12), 16(Bwt16), and 20(Bwt20) weeks of age. Results for this study indicated average performance in all body weight measurements was significantly higher under intensive management compared to extensive management (P< 0.001), signifying two diverse environment and hence possibility for G x E interaction. Based on magnitude of genetic correlation for the same trait measured in two environments ( rg ) G x E interaction for all body weight measurements were found to be substantial (i.e. biologically important). Value for rg was 0.745, 0.757, 0.752 and 0.753 for Bwt8, Bwt12, Bwt16 and Bwt20, respectively. Since breeding program for improving performance of the ecotype would be more feasible under intensive management and hence more likely to take place under such environment, based on results of this study, if such breeding program is to be implemented, sensitization of smallholder farmers (beneficiaries of the breeding program) to shift from their current system of management (extensive management) to at least semiintensive system of management is recommended for minimizing the effect of G x E interaction.

References

33 Cites in Article
  1. I Aini (1990). Indigenous chicken production in South-east Asia.
  2. R Alabi,A Esobhawan,M Aruna (2006). Econometric determination of contribution of family poultry to women's income in Niger-delta, Nigeria.
  3. B Besbes (1996). Genotype evaluation and breeding of poultry for performance under sub-optimal village conditions.
  4. E Goromela,R Kwakkel,M Verstegen,A Katule (2006). Strategies to optimize the use of scavengeable feed resource base by smallholders in traditional poultry production systems in Africa: A review.
  5. W Hohenboken (1985). Genotype x Environment Interaction.
  6. G Hørning,S Rasmussen,A Permin,M Bisgaard (2003). Investigations on the Influence of Helminth Parasites on Vaccination of Chickens against Newcastle Disease Virus under Village Conditions.
  7. T Ibi,H Hirooka,A Kahi,Y Sasae,Y Sasaki (2005). Genotype x environmental interaction effects on carcass traits in Japanese Black cattle.
  8. J Illango,W Olaho-Mukani,G Mukiibi-Muka,P Abila,A Etoori (1990). Immunogenicity of a Locally Produced Newcastle Disease I-2 Thermostable Vaccine in Chickens in Uganda.
  9. I Kosgey (2004). Breeding objectives and breeding strategies of small ruminants in tropics.
  10. Edward Rojas,Hans Jørgensen,Birgit Jensen,David Collinge (1998). Fusarium diseases: biology and management perspectives.
  11. C Lin,K Togashi (2002). Genetic improvement in the presence of genotype by environment interaction.
  12. Laswai Francis,Massawe Boniface,Maliondo Salim,Kilawe Charles,Malila Barnabas,Hadija Mchelu (2007). Foliar nutrient concentration in first and second rotations of Pinus patula at Sao Hill forest plantation in Tanzania.
  13. J Lwelamira,G Kifaro,P Gwakisa (2008). Genetic parameters for body weights, egg traits and antibody response against Newcastle Disease Virus (NDV) vaccine among two Tanzania chicken ecotypes.
  14. J Lwelamira,G Kifaro,P Gwakisa (2009). Genetic parameters for body weights, egg traits and antibody response against Newcastle Disease Virus (NDV) vaccine among two Tanzania chicken ecotypes.
  15. H Magwisha,A Kassuku,N Kyvsgaard,A Permin (2001). A Comparison of the Prevalence and Burdens of Helminth Infections in Growers and Adult Free-Range Chickens.
  16. N Maniatis,G Pollott (2002). Genotype by environment interactions in lamb weight and carcass composition traits.
  17. P Msoffe (2003). Diversity among local chicken ecotypes in Tanzania.
  18. F Muchadeyi,C Wollny,H Eding,S Weigend,S Makuza,H Simianer (2007). Variation in village chicken production systems among agro-ecological zones of Zimbabwe.
  19. F Muchadeyi,S Sibanda,N Kusina,J Kusina,J,S Makuza (2005). Village chicken flock dynamics and contribution of chickens to household livelihoods in smallholder farming area in Zimbabwe.
  20. G Kiwuwa,T Mukherjee,P Horst,D Flock,J Petersen (1980). Sire x location interactions from progeny tests in different countries.
  21. H Mulder,P Bijma (2005). Effects of genotype × environment interaction on genetic gain in breeding programs1.
  22. A,N Sellier,M Tixier-Boichard,C Beaumont,S Mignon-Grasteau (2007). Genotype by environment interactions in relation to growth traits in slow growing chickens.
  23. W Nauta (2009). Selective breeding in organic dairy production.
  24. M Otim (2005). Newcastle disease in village poultry: Molecular and phylogenetic studies of the virus and disease epidemiology.
  25. Søren Pedersen,Tseganesh Tamirat,Tarekegn Erekalo (2002). The economics of precision agriculture.
  26. Alan Robertson (1959). The Sampling Variance of the Genetic Correlation Coefficient.
  27. Stig Milan Thamsborg,Andrew Williams,Helena Mejer,Nadine Ravinet,Miguel Peña-Espinoza,Philip Skuce (2005). Improving the management of parasites in organic dairy farming.
  28. Sylvia Lenz (2000). Glenn A. Walker, Jack Shostak: Common statistical methods for clinical research with SAS examples 3rd edition.
  29. P Sørensen (1977). Genotype‐level of protein interaction for growth rate in broilers.
  30. P Sørensen (1999). Gender and Law Initiatives in Francophone Sub-Saharan Africa : Gender and Law Workshop in Francophone Sub-Saharan Africa (March 1998).
  31. K Togashi,C Lin,K Moribe (2001). Construction of Optimum Index to Maximize Overall Response Across Countries in the Presence of Genotype × Environment Interaction.
  32. B Tolon,S Yalcin (1997). Bone characteristics and body weight of broilers in different husbandry systems.
  33. C Wollny,J Banda,T Mlewah,R Phoya (2002). The lessons of livestock improvement failure: Revising breeding strategies Livestock Production.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Dr. J. Lwelamira. 1970. \u201cGenotype-Environment (G X E) Interaction for Body Weights for Kuchi Chicken Ecotype of Tanzania Reared Under Intensive and Extensive Management\u201d. Unknown Journal GJMR Volume 12 (GJMR Volume 12 Issue 5).

Download Citation

Journal Specifications
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date
July 2, 2012

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 20913
Total Downloads: 11049
2026 Trends
Related Research
Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Genotype-Environment (G X E) Interaction for Body Weights for Kuchi Chicken Ecotype of Tanzania Reared Under Intensive and Extensive Management

Dr. J. Lwelamira
Dr. J. Lwelamira <p>Institute of Rural Development Planning</p>

Research Journals