Guava (Psidium guajava)+Summer Groundnut (Arachis hypogea) for Control of Biotic and Abiotic Harmful Factors

§ Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and T...

Send Message

To: Author

Guava (Psidium guajava)+Summer Groundnut (Arachis hypogea) for Control of Biotic and Abiotic Harmful Factors

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

K2TLZ

Guava (Psidium guajava)+Summer Groundnut (Arachis hypogea) for Control of Biotic and Abiotic Harmful Factors Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
Font Type
Font Size
Font Size
Bedground

Abstract

The field study was laid out during three consecutive years of 2005-06 to 2007-08 at Mainpuri, Farrukhabad and Kannauj districts. The operational area located between catchments area of Ganga and Kali rivers. The experimental soils were loamy sand, sandy loam and light loam in texture. The analysis of composite soil sample displayed low status of plant nutrients. The four treatments i.e, guava + groundnut cv. Dh-86 + soil application of neem leaves power @ 50 kg/ha and spraying of neem oil on guava plants @ 2.5 lit/ha, guava + groundnut cv. Dh-86 + soil application of neem leaves powder @ 100 kg/ha and spraying of neem oil on guava plants @ 2.5 lit/ha, guava + groundnut cv ICGV 93468 + soil application of neem leaves powder @ 50 kg/ha and spraying of neem oil on guava plants @ 2.5 lit/ha and guava + groundnut cv. ICGV-93468 + soil application of neem leaves powder @ 100 kg/ha and spraying of neem oil on guava plants @ 2.5 lit/ha were tested. The farmers were suggested for plantation of guava at the spacing of 6×6 m 2 . The cultivars Dh-86 and ICGV-93468 (Avtar) were selected and planted between 5-10 March of experimental years. The 20 rows of groundnut were planted between two rows guava. The sowing of groundnut was made at spacing of 25 cm in rows.

I. INTRODUCTION

In Uttar Pradesh (India), the riverine soils of Semi-Arid-Tropics (SAT) area, having loamy sand, sandy loam and light loam texture is famous for cultivation of groundnut in rainy season. In early 1980s, groundnut was grown in U.P. on an area of 0.3 million ha with production of 0.19 million t. Since then, both area and production have slowly and steadily decreased due to various reasons especially white grubs and other soil insect and by 2010-11 the groundnut area reduced to 0.08 million ha and the production to 0.08 million tonnes with an average productivity of 988 kg/ha and the area under rainy season groundnut was gradually occupied largely by guava and other horticultural and field crops. With the introduction and spread of groundnut cultivars Dh-86 and ICGV-93468 (Avtar) for cultivation in summer. The area under summer groundnut grew in leaps and bounds from non in 2001 to 3,17,068 ha in 2011 with productivity of 25.32 q/ha. This rapid growth of area under summer groundnut promoted the need for research on cultivation of groundnut in area occupied by guava. The main objective of the experiment was to explore the feasibility of summer groundnut cultivation in the interspaces of younger plantation or already planted guava for utilizing the vacant spaces along with control of insects especially soil insects, which are damage to the pods of groundnut. The secondary objective was to increase the area under summer groundnut in catchments area of river Ganga and its tributaries, where, guava orchards have been well established. The experiment was planned on sandy loam, sandy clay loam and light loam soil of Semi-Arid Climatic Zone of Uttar Pradesh for cultivation summer groundnut during March to June by utilizing the area available between the widely spaced rows of guava. Therefore, filler cropping of summer groundnut in guava spaces is the subject matter of this manuscript.

II. MATERIALS AND METHODS

The innovative field study was undertaken during three consecutive years of 2005-06 to 2007-08 at Mainpuri, Farrukhabad and Kannuaj districts. The operational area located between the catchments area of rivers Ganga and Kali. The soils of operational area were loamy sand, sandy loam and light loam in texture. The composite sample of soil was taken and analyzed. The composite soil sample, having pH 7.9, organic carbon 0.27 % , total nitrogen 0.03 % , available P 2 O 5 7.9 kg/ha and available K 2 O 192 kg/ha. The pH was determined by Electrometric glass electrode method (Piper, 1950), while organic carbon was determined by

Colorimetric method (Datta, et al., 1962). Total nitrogen was analyzed by Kjeldahl's method as discussed by Piper (1950). The available P 2 O 5 and K 2 O were determined by Olsen's method (Olsen et al., 1954) and Flam photometric method (Singh, 1971), respectively. The treatments i.e., guava + groundnut cv. Dh-86 + soil application of neem leaves powder@50 kg/ha and spraying of neem oil on guava [email protected] lit/ha, guava + groundnut cv. Dh-86 + soil application of neem leaves powder@100 kg/ha and spraying of neem oil on guava [email protected] lit/ha, guava + groundnut cv. ICGV-93468 + soil application of neem leaves powder@50 kg/ha and spraying of neem oil on guava [email protected] lit/ha and guava + groundnut cv. ICGV-93468 + soil application of neem leaves powder@100 kg/ha and spraying of neem oil on guava [email protected] lit/ha were tested. The fields of guava with two to four years old plantation were selected for sowing of groundnut as a summer filler crops. The farmers were advised for the plantation of guava at spacing of 6 × 6 m 2 . Two cultivars of groundnut viz., Dh-86 and ICGV-93468 were selected for filler cropping. The groundnut was planted from 5-10 March during the three experimental years. The 20 rows of groundnut were planted between two rows of guava. The sowing of groundnut was done at spacing of 25 cm. The gap of 50 cm was maintained between the adjacent guava and groundnut rows from both sides to facilitate easy intercultural operations. The recommended package of practices was followed for raising of both crops. The groundnut was harvested at 90-95 days after planting in 3 to 8 June of three years. Both crops were irrigated as and when required.

III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The pooled data of fruits yield of guava, pods yield of summer groundnut, system productivity and incidence of insects, pest and diseases have been presented in Table-1 and discussed here under appropriate heads.

a) Fruits yield of guava

Perusal of data make it clear that guava + groundnut cv. ICGV-93468 + soil application of neem leaves powder@100 kg/ha and spraying of neem oil on guava [email protected] lit/ha treatment gave higher fruits yield of guava by 79.00 q/ha (T4), closely followed by guava + groundnut cv. ICGV-93468 + soil application of neem leaves powder@50 kg/ha and spraying of neem oil on guava [email protected] lit/ha (77.00 q/ha) in comparison to T1 (74.00 q/ha) and T2 (76.00 q/ha). These results confirm the findings of Singh (2009) and Singh (2011).

b) Pods yield of summer groundnut

It is clear from the results that not much variation was found under different treatments, though numerically higher pods yield of cultivar ICGV-93468 was weighed under treatment of guava + groundnut cv. ICGV-93468 + soil application of neem leaves powder@100 kg/ha and spraying of neem oil on guava [email protected] lit/ha by 31.00 q/ha as compared to other tested treatments. The performance of pods yield of groundnut was T 4 (31.00 q/ha) > T 2 (30.30 q/ha) > T 1 (25.00 q/ha) and > T 3 (24.00 q/ha). These results are in agreement with those reported by Singh (2009) and Singh (2011).

c) System productivity

The system productivity was computed from the total production of fruits yield of guava and pods yield of summer groundnut. The highest total productivity was found under guava + groundnut cv. ICGV-93468 + soil application neem leaves powder@100 kg/ha and spraying of neem oil on guava [email protected] lit./ha by 110.00 q/ha, closely followed by guava + groundnut cv. Dh-86 + soil application neem leaves powder@100 kg/ha and spraying of neem oil on guava [email protected] lit./ha by 106.30 q/ha. The two treatments i.e., T 1 and T 3 displayed the system productivity as 99.00 q/ha and 101.00 q/ha, which was lowest. The higher and lowest yield of guava fruits and pods yield of summer groundnut under tested treatments were responsible for highest and lowest system productivity. Similar results have also been reported by Singh (2009) and Singh (2011).

d) Biotic Control

i. Incidence of insects, pest and diseases

For the control of white grubs, termites and pod borers, soil application of neem leaves powder was made before the sowing of groundnut. The lower and higher doses of neem leaves@50 kg/ha and 100 kg/ha, respectively, fully control the incidence of white grubs and BND disease in groundnut. The 1 % incidence of termites was counted under lower dose of 50 kg/ha neem leaves powder, while it was fully control at higher dose of 100 kg/ha neem leaves powder. The pods damage by pod borers was recorded between 1 % to 2 % under lower and higher doses of neem leaves powder. For the control of white grubs in groundnut, the prophylactic control measure was also adopted by the spraying of neem [email protected] lit/ha on guava plantation. These plant protection measures displayed the significant achievement in control of insects, pest and diseases in groundnut and guava under agro-forestry system.

ii. Abiotic control

It is well known fact that the riverine soils of Uttar Pradesh have more percentage of sand in texture with crumby structure which support to the wind soil erosion. The considerable soil moisture also loss due to high wind velocity during summer season. Being cover crop, groundnut, grown as filler crop, between rows of guava control. The wind erosion of soil and checked the moisture loss. These results are in agreement with those reported by Singh (2011).

IV. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

In agro-forestry system of guava + groundnut cv. Dh-86 and cv. ICGV-93468 + soil application of neem leaves powder@100 kg/ha and spraying of neem oil on guava [email protected] lit/ha gave highest fruits yield of guava and pods yield of groundnut during summer season, therefore, farm families of guava and summer groundnut growing tracts may be suggested for adoption of this system and harvest the fruits of newly generated technology.

References

6 Cites in Article
  1. N Datta,M Khera,T Saini (1962). A rapid calorimetric procedure for determination of organic carbon in soils.
  2. S Olsen,F Watanabe,C Cole (1954). EFFECT OF SODIUM BICARBONATE ON THE SOLUBILITY OF PHOSPHORUS IN CALCAREOUS SOILS.
  3. C Piper (1950). Soil and Plant Analysis.
  4. R Singh (2011). Guava + summer groundnut -A New Vista of Agro-Forestry for Semi-Arid-Tropics of Uttar Pradesh. NSAESLS and Climate Resilient Agriculture: Challenges and Opportunities, organized by NRCAF.
  5. R Singh (2009). Summer groundnut hold a good promise as companion crop in guava plantation in U.
  6. T Singh (1971). A laboratory manual for soil fertility and fertilizer.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

R.A. Singh, I.P. Singh, V.R. Chaudhary,, R.K. Singh, Dharmendra Yadav. 2026. "Guava (Psidium guajava)+Summer Groundnut (Arachis hypogea) for Control of Biotic and Abiotic Harmful Factors". Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - D: Agriculture & Veterinary GJSFR-D Volume 23 (GJSFR Volume 23 Issue D1).

Download Citation

High-quality image showcasing groundnut pest management techniques.
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJSFR

Print ISSN 0975-5896

e-ISSN 2249-4626

Keywords
Classification
GJSFR-D Classification DDC Code: 843.91 LCC Code: PQ2637.A274
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date
March 27, 2023

Language
English
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 353
Total Downloads: 29
All Trends

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Guava (Psidium guajava)+Summer Groundnut (Arachis hypogea) for Control of Biotic and Abiotic Harmful Factors

R.A. Singh
R.A. Singh <p>Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology</p>
I.P. Singh
I.P. Singh
V.R. Chaudhary,
V.R. Chaudhary,
R.K. Singh
R.K. Singh
Dharmendra Yadav
Dharmendra Yadav