Health Informatics Integrated System Post-Implementation Evaluation

Health Informatics Integrated System Post-Implementation Evaluation

Sajeesh Kumar

Contact

1 University of Tennessee Health Science Center

GJMR Volume 15 Issue K3

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

EG4FX

Health Informatics Integrated System Post-Implementation Evaluation Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

The objective of our study was to evaluate, in a population of Togolese People Living With HIV(PLWHIV), the agreement between three scores derived from the general population namely the Framingham score, the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE), the evaluation of the cardiovascular risk (CVR) according to the World Health Organization.

Part of awell-designed health informatics simple mentation process includes the mechanisms put in place to help the day-to-day operators of the systems. Continual appraisal of these methods necessitates up-to-date investigations. Understanding critical elements which support a positive transition of health information technology (HIT) within healthcare facilities is the objective of the following research. To help develop these findings, a prospective postimplementation and use assessment survey was conducted on two hospitalsin Central Texas. The population studied included RN case managers, social workers and supportive staff in the Continuum of Care departmentsat two Scott & White Healthcare acute care facilities. The implementation process appeared to provide a mostly encouraging transition with a small number of components noted of concern to the staff. Areas of enhancement were revealed included improving training specific to job roles and supplying more fitting integration of processes and workflows.

Article content is being processed or not available yet.

13 Cites in Articles

References

Rod Brace (2014). The Science of Engagement. Present at the Memorial Hermann Case Management Retreat.
(2007). 2014 National Survey of Canadian Nurses.
(2001). Crossing the Quality Chasm.
(2010). Health Information Technology: Initial Set.
(2013). Statistics Coach.
E Kirkendall,L Goldenhar,J Simon,D Wheeler,Andrew Spooner,S (2013). Transitioning from a computerized provider order entry and paper documentation system to an electronic health record: Expectations and experiences of hospital staff.
A Laramee,M Bosek,C Kasprisin,T Powers-Phaneuf (2012). Learning From Within to Ensure a Successful Implementation of an Electronic Health Record.
Ann Laramee,Marcia Bosek,Hollie Shaner-Mcrae,Terry Powers-Phaneuf (2012). A Comparison of Nurse Attitudes Before Implementation and 6 and 18 Months After Implementation of an Electronic Health Record.
(2009). Energy-conserving development regulations: current practice.
Paul Harris,Robert Taylor,Robert Thielke,Jonathon Payne,Nathaniel Gonzalez,Jose Conde (2009). Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.
P Sockolow,J Weiner,K Bowles,H Lehmann (2011). A new instrument for measuring clinician satisfaction with electronic health records.
Joanne Spetz,James Burgess,Ciaran Phibbs (2012). The effect of health information technology implementation in Veterans Health Administration hospitals on patient outcomes.
Marcia Ward,Smruti Vartak,Tammy Schwichtenberg,Douglas Wakefield (2011). Nurses' Perceptions of How Clinical Information System Implementation Affects Workflow and Patient Care.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

Sajeesh Kumar. 2015. \u201cHealth Informatics Integrated System Post-Implementation Evaluation\u201d. Global Journal of Medical Research - K: Interdisciplinary GJMR-K Volume 15 (GJMR Volume 15 Issue K3): .

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

Download Article

GJMR Volume 15 Issue K3
Pg. 1- 37

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjmra

Print ISSN 0975-5888

e-ISSN 2249-4618

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJMR-K Classification: NLMC Code: W 26.5

Submission ReceivedFebruary 3, 2015
RevisedFebruary 3, 2015
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted March 3, 2015
Published March 15, 2015

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

May 22, 2015

Language

English

Experiance in AR

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Read in 3D

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Article Matrices

Total Score: 131

Country: United States

Subject: Global Journal of Medical Research - K: Interdisciplinary

Authors: Sajeesh Kumar (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 142

Total Views (Real + Logic): 4118

Total Downloads (simulated): 2162

Publish Date: 2015 05, Fri

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 24 views
Month 2: 54 views
Month 3: 32 views
Month 4: 63 views
Month 5: 32 views
Month 6: 33 views
Month 7: 42 views
Month 8: 26 views
Month 9: 42 views
Month 10: 44 views
Month 11: 45 views
Month 12: 36 views
Month 13: 16 views
Month 14: 20 views
Month 15: 25 views
Month 16: 34 views
Month 17: 42 views
Month 18: 31 views
Month 19: 29 views
Month 20: 33 views
Month 21: 27 views
Month 22: 36 views
Month 23: 32 views
Month 24: 25 views
Month 25: 35 views
Month 26: 21 views
Month 27: 11 views
Month 28: 39 views
Month 29: 24 views
Month 30: 27 views
Month 31: 26 views
Month 32: 39 views
Month 33: 32 views
Month 34: 28 views
Month 35: 21 views
Month 36: 21 views
Month 37: 32 views
Month 38: 42 views
Month 39: 19 views
Month 40: 41 views
Month 41: 35 views
Month 42: 36 views
Month 43: 28 views
Month 44: 43 views
Month 45: 25 views
Month 46: 37 views
Month 47: 36 views
Month 48: 27 views
Month 49: 33 views
Month 50: 27 views
Month 51: 17 views
Month 52: 23 views
Month 53: 45 views
Month 54: 24 views
Month 55: 22 views
Month 56: 33 views
Month 57: 29 views
Month 58: 31 views
Month 59: 39 views
Month 60: 28 views
Month 61: 47 views
Month 62: 12 views
Month 63: 28 views
Month 64: 29 views
Month 65: 26 views
Month 66: 21 views
Month 67: 31 views
Month 68: 43 views
Month 69: 28 views
Month 70: 25 views
Month 71: 25 views
Month 72: 37 views
Month 73: 17 views
Month 74: 24 views
Month 75: 34 views
Month 76: 34 views
Month 77: 38 views
Month 78: 18 views
Month 79: 36 views
Month 80: 29 views
Month 81: 40 views
Month 82: 28 views
Month 83: 39 views
Month 84: 35 views
Month 85: 37 views
Month 86: 14 views
Month 87: 18 views
Month 88: 32 views
Month 89: 35 views
Month 90: 34 views
Month 91: 19 views
Month 92: 31 views
Month 93: 21 views
Month 94: 37 views
Month 95: 21 views
Month 96: 28 views
Month 97: 37 views
Month 98: 29 views
Month 99: 44 views
Month 100: 29 views
Month 101: 25 views
Month 102: 17 views
Month 103: 31 views
Month 104: 32 views
Month 105: 21 views
Month 106: 32 views
Month 107: 23 views
Month 108: 37 views
Month 109: 35 views
Month 110: 33 views
Month 111: 22 views
Month 112: 25 views
Month 113: 26 views
Month 114: 39 views
Month 115: 38 views
Month 116: 30 views
Month 117: 29 views
Month 118: 28 views
Month 119: 41 views
Month 120: 23 views
Month 121: 29 views
Month 122: 22 views
Month 123: 33 views
Month 124: 40 views
Month 125: 23 views
Month 126: 16 views
Month 127: 21 views
Month 128: 42 views
Month 129: 36 views
Month 130: 46 views
Month 131: 39 views

Total Views: 4118

Total Downloads: 2162

2026 Trends

Research Identity (RIN)

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

This Page is Under Development

We are currently updating this article page for a better experience.