How to Successfully Implement a Corporate Taxonomy

How to Successfully Implement a Corporate Taxonomy

Kelly Wibbenmeyer MBA, PMP, Six Sigma Black Belt, ITIL certified, PhD Student

Contact

α Northcentral University

How to Successfully Implement a Corporate Taxonomy

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

CSTITO98G9

How to Successfully Implement a Corporate Taxonomy Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

References

36 Cites in Article

Reference Format

Fran Alexander (2012). Assessing information taxonomies using epistemology and the sociology of science.
H Amado-Salvatierra,R Hernández,J Hilera (2012). Implementation of Accessibility Standards in the Process of Course Design in Virtual Learning Environments.
Caprina Beal,Thomas Griffin (2012). Examining The Impact Of Sarbanes-Oxley On Non-Profit Health Care Organizations.
S Brinker (2013). Martec's law: Technology changes exponentially, organizations change logarithmically.
T Byrne (2004). Where Do We Go from here?.
Hui-Chuan Chu,Ming-Yen Chen,Yuh-Min Chen (2009). A semantic-based approach to content abstraction and annotation for content management.
H De Koning,J De Mast,R Does,T Vermaat,S Simons (2008). Generic lean six sigma project definitions in financial services.
P Decker,R Durand,C Mayfield,C Mccormack,D Skinner,G Perdue (2012). Predicting implementation failure in organization change.
B Eden (2005). Introduction.
K Gallagher (2002). A systemic view of continual change.
E Gardner (2014). Breaking Down Health Silos From Baltimore To Aspen.
M Gilbert,K Shegda,K Chin,G Tay,H Koehler-Kruener (2013). Magic quadrant for enterprise content management.
Barney Glaser,Anselm Strauss (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory.
Johanna Gunnlaugsdottir (2012). Functional classification scheme for records.
Richard Herschel,Nory Jones (2005). Knowledge management and business intelligence: the importance of integration.
M Hlava (2014). Standards and taxonomies. Synthesis lectures on information concept.
Shiva Hullavarad,Russell O’hare,Ashok Roy (2015). Enterprise Content Management solutions—Roadmap strategy and implementation challenges.
(2015). LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP., a Nevada corporation, Plaintiff, v. UKNOWN REGISTRANTS OF www.wn0000.com, www.wn1111.com, www.wn2222.com, www.wn3333.com, www.wn4444.com, www.wn5555.com, www.wn6666.com, www.wn7777.com, www.wn8888.com, www.wn9999.com, www.112211.com, www.4456888.com, www.4489888.com, www.001148.com, and www.2289888.com, Defendants..
A Jaffar,H Weistroffer (2012). Enterprise content management research: A comprehensive review.
V Jan,A Simons,A Herbst,R Derungs,S Novotny (2011). The business drivers behind ECM initiatives: A process perspective.
Diane Janvrin,Won No (2012). XBRL Implementation: A Field Investigation to Identify Research Opportunities.
Hao Wang,Shenghu Liu,Bin Gao,Shilei Xue (2013). Airborne Test Data Processing and High-Speed Transmission Technology Based on 5G Private Network.
Johnson Morris,G (2014). The positive deviance phenomenon of leading successful strategic change.
William Kuechler,Vijay Vaishnavi (2006). So, Talk to Me: The Effect of Explicit Goals on the Comprehension of Business Process Narratives1.
Reza Malek,Rashad Yazdanifard (2011). Overview of Change Management and Its Implementation.
S Markham,M Kowolenko,T Michaelis (2015). Unstructured text analytics to support new product development decisions.
J Moore (2000). One road to turnover: An examination of work exhaustion in technology professionals.
B Munkvold,T Paivarinta,A Hodne,E Strangeland (2006). Contemporary issues of enterprise content management: The case of Statoil.
Stig Nordheim,Tero Päivärinta (2006). Implementing enterprise content management: from evolution through strategy to contradictions out-of-the-box.
T Paivarinta,B Munkvold (2005). Enterprise content management: An integrated perspective on information management.
D Payne (2013). Metadata: The good, the bad, and the misunderstood.
M Pincher (2010). Developing a Business Strategy.
Jan Vom Brocke,Alexander Simons,Anne Cleven (2011). Towards a business process-oriented approach to enterprise content management: the ECM-blueprinting framework.
V Votsch (2001). A taxonomy for content management systems.
M Wadhwa,A Harper (2014). Technology, Innovation, and Enterprise Transformation.
E Woods (2004). LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP., a Nevada corporation, Plaintiff, v. UKNOWN REGISTRANTS OF www.wn0000.com, www.wn1111.com, www.wn2222.com, www.wn3333.com, www.wn4444.com, www.wn5555.com, www.wn6666.com, www.wn7777.com, www.wn8888.com, www.wn9999.com, www.112211.com, www.4456888.com, www.4489888.com, www.001148.com, and www.2289888.com, Defendants..

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Kelly Wibbenmeyer. 2015. \u201cHow to Successfully Implement a Corporate Taxonomy\u201d. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology - H: Information & Technology GJCST-H Volume 15 (GJCST Volume 15 Issue H5): .

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

Download Article

GJCST Volume 15 Issue H5
Pg. 9- 22

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjcst

Print ISSN 0975-4350

e-ISSN 0975-4172

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJCST-H Classification: J.4, K.4.2

Submission ReceivedDecember 7, 2014
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted December 31, 2014
Published January 15, 2015

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

November 27, 2015

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 101

Country: Unknown

Subject: Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology - H: Information & Technology

Authors: Kelly Wibbenmeyer (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 263

Total Views (Real + Logic): 7785

Total Downloads (simulated): 2069

Publish Date: 2015 11, Fri

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 30 views
Month 2: 35 views
Month 3: 33 views
Month 4: 33 views
Month 5: 64 views
Month 6: 27 views
Month 7: 47 views
Month 8: 30 views
Month 9: 44 views
Month 10: 53 views
Month 11: 49 views
Month 12: 23 views
Month 13: 39 views
Month 14: 39 views
Month 15: 33 views
Month 16: 27 views
Month 17: 29 views
Month 18: 14 views
Month 19: 28 views
Month 20: 18 views
Month 21: 26 views
Month 22: 37 views
Month 23: 26 views
Month 24: 44 views
Month 25: 37 views
Month 26: 29 views
Month 27: 37 views
Month 28: 32 views
Month 29: 33 views
Month 30: 34 views
Month 31: 17 views
Month 32: 22 views
Month 33: 35 views
Month 34: 28 views
Month 35: 21 views
Month 36: 33 views
Month 37: 21 views
Month 38: 32 views
Month 39: 31 views
Month 40: 29 views
Month 41: 33 views
Month 42: 12 views
Month 43: 41 views
Month 44: 45 views
Month 45: 35 views
Month 46: 23 views
Month 47: 25 views
Month 48: 34 views
Month 49: 32 views
Month 50: 44 views
Month 51: 33 views
Month 52: 20 views
Month 53: 31 views
Month 54: 20 views
Month 55: 19 views
Month 56: 34 views
Month 57: 24 views
Month 58: 33 views
Month 59: 28 views
Month 60: 38 views
Month 61: 31 views
Month 62: 21 views
Month 63: 37 views
Month 64: 32 views
Month 65: 44 views
Month 66: 24 views
Month 67: 34 views
Month 68: 19 views
Month 69: 28 views
Month 70: 20 views
Month 71: 22 views
Month 72: 26 views
Month 73: 26 views
Month 74: 35 views
Month 75: 38 views
Month 76: 32 views
Month 77: 17 views
Month 78: 15 views
Month 79: 37 views
Month 80: 40 views
Month 81: 22 views
Month 82: 22 views
Month 83: 49 views
Month 84: 25 views
Month 85: 35 views
Month 86: 34 views
Month 87: 24 views
Month 88: 41 views
Month 89: 24 views
Month 90: 29 views
Month 91: 19 views
Month 92: 41 views
Month 93: 28 views
Month 94: 28 views
Month 95: 14 views
Month 96: 23 views
Month 97: 29 views
Month 98: 36 views
Month 99: 11 views
Month 100: 35 views
Month 101: 22 views
Month 102: 15 views
Month 103: 23 views
Month 104: 31 views
Month 105: 13 views
Month 106: 47 views
Month 107: 21 views
Month 108: 14 views
Month 109: 35 views
Month 110: 13 views
Month 111: 42 views
Month 112: 27 views
Month 113: 12 views
Month 114: 46 views
Month 115: 33 views
Month 116: 26 views
Month 117: 41 views
Month 118: 39 views
Month 119: 30 views
Month 120: 44 views
Month 121: 35 views
Month 122: 28 views
Month 123: 25 views
Month 124: 32 views
Month 125: 54 views

Total Views: 7785

Total Downloads: 2069

2026 Trends

Published Article

Abstract not found

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]