Image Segmentation using Rough Set based Fuzzy K-Means Algorithm

ev reddy

Image Segmentation using Rough Set based Fuzzy K-Means Algorithm

Dr. Venkateswarareddy Eluri * § PhD

Contact

Prof E.Sreenivasa Reddy ‡

Contact

§ Nagarjuna university

‡ Acharya Nagarjuna University

Image Segmentation using Rough Set based Fuzzy K-Means Algorithm

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

CSTGV306X6

Image Segmentation using Rough Set based Fuzzy K-Means Algorithm Banner

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant

This converted HTML version may contain rendering inconsistencies. Please refer to the PDF for the authoritative version, or click here to provide feedback.

Abstract

Image segmentation is critical for many computer vision and information retrieval systems, and has received significant attention from industry and academia over last three decades. Despite notable advances in the area, there is no standard technique for selecting a segmentation algorithm to use in a particular application, nor even is there an agreed upon means of comparing the performance of one method with another. This paper, explores Rough-Fuzzy K-means (RFKM) algorithm, a new intelligent technique used to discover data dependencies, data reduction, approximate set classification, and rule induction from image databases. Rough sets offer an effective approach of managing uncertainties and also used for image segmentation, feature identification, dimensionality reduction, and pattern classification. The proposed algorithm is based on a modified K-means clustering using rough set theory (RFKM) for image segmentation, which is further divided into two parts. Primarily the cluster centers are determined and then in the next phase they are reduced using Rough set theory (RST). K-means clustering algorithm is then applied on the reduced and optimized set of cluster centers with the purpose of segmentation of the images. The existing clustering algorithms require initialization of cluster centers whereas the proposed scheme does not require any such prior information to partition the exact regions. Experimental results show that the proposed method perform well and improve the segmentation results in the vague areas of the image.

References

12 Cites in Article

Reference Format

1. F Russo (1998). Edge detection in noisy images using fuzzy reasoning. IEEE transactions on instrumenttation and measurement, 47(5), 1102-1105.
2. Farrah Ht,Nagarajan Wong,Ramachandran (2001). An image segmentation method using fuzzy-based threshold. International symposium on signal processing and its applications (ISSPA), 144-147.
3. A Borji,M Hamidi (2007). Evolving a fuzzy rule base for image segmentation. Proceedings of world academy of science, engineering and technology, 22, 4-9.
4. Alexander Rakhlin,Andrea Caponnetto (2007). Stability of K-Means Clustering. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19, 1121-1128.
5. Rfkm Rfcm Fcm Clusteing Time (null). Table 8: Time complexity measurements for cryptographic operations (sec). Clusteing Time
6. A Rui,J Sousa (2006). Comparison of fuzzy clustering algorithms for Classification. International Symposium on Evolving Fuzzy Systems, 112-117.
7. V Rao,Dr Vidyavathi (2010). Comparative Investigations and Performance Analysis of FCM and MFPCM Algorithms on Iris data. Indian Journal of Computer Science and Engineering, 1(2), 145-151.
8. Z Pawlak (1982). Rough sets. Internat. J. Comput. Inform. Sci, 11, 341-356.
9. Z Pawlak (1991). of System Theory, Knowledge Engineering and Problem Solving. of System Theory, Knowledge Engineering and Problem Solving, 9
10. Y Yong,Z Chongxun,L Pan (2004). A Novel Fuzzy C-Means Clustering Algorithm for Image Thresholding. Measurement Science Review, 4(1)
11. K Nirulata,S Meher Skin Tumor Segmentation using Fuzzy c-means Clustering with Neighbourhood Attraction. Communicated to International Journal of Computers and Electrical Engineering
12. X Hui,J Wu,C Jian (2009). K-Means clustering versus validation measures: A data distribution perspective. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and cybernetics, 39(2), 319-331.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Dr. ev reddy, Prof E.Sreenivasa Reddy. 2013. "Image Segmentation using Rough Set based Fuzzy K-Means Algorithm". Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology - F: Graphics & Vision GJCST-F Volume 13 (GJCST Volume 13 Issue F6).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJCST Volume 13 Issue F6

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjcst

Print ISSN 0975-4350

e-ISSN 0975-4172

Keywords

K-means algorithm RGB images rough set uncertain images

Classification

GJCST-F Classification I.4.6

Submission ReceivedDecember 8, 2012
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 5, 2013
Published August 10, 2013

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

August 10, 2013

Language

English

Order Article Reprint

Experience in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 107

Country: India

Subject: Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology - F: Graphics & Vision

Authors: E. Venkateswara Reddy, Dr. E.S.Reddy (PhD/Dr. count: 1)

View Count (all-time): 428

Total Views (Real + Logic): 3352

Total Downloads (simulated): 200

Publish Date: 2013 01, Tue

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 55 views
Month 2: 68 views
Month 3: 60 views
Month 4: 49 views
Month 5: 39 views
Month 6: 30 views
Month 7: 43 views
Month 8: 50 views
Month 9: 41 views
Month 10: 34 views
Month 11: 23 views
Month 12: 31 views
Month 13: 25 views
Month 14: 31 views
Month 15: 26 views
Month 16: 19 views
Month 17: 28 views
Month 18: 23 views
Month 19: 34 views
Month 20: 40 views
Month 21: 23 views
Month 22: 41 views
Month 23: 16 views
Month 24: 25 views
Month 25: 17 views
Month 26: 32 views
Month 27: 39 views
Month 28: 26 views
Month 29: 27 views
Month 30: 26 views
Month 31: 20 views
Month 32: 17 views
Month 33: 43 views
Month 34: 39 views
Month 35: 27 views
Month 36: 37 views
Month 37: 38 views
Month 38: 32 views
Month 39: 36 views
Month 40: 32 views
Month 41: 42 views
Month 42: 25 views
Month 43: 36 views
Month 44: 39 views
Month 45: 34 views
Month 46: 45 views
Month 47: 29 views
Month 48: 22 views
Month 49: 41 views
Month 50: 35 views
Month 51: 40 views
Month 52: 43 views
Month 53: 35 views
Month 54: 25 views
Month 55: 37 views
Month 56: 29 views
Month 57: 37 views
Month 58: 35 views
Month 59: 20 views
Month 60: 25 views
Month 61: 35 views
Month 62: 28 views
Month 63: 38 views
Month 64: 29 views
Month 65: 36 views
Month 66: 42 views
Month 67: 36 views
Month 68: 33 views
Month 69: 40 views
Month 70: 22 views
Month 71: 14 views
Month 72: 23 views
Month 73: 32 views
Month 74: 38 views
Month 75: 25 views
Month 76: 28 views
Month 77: 47 views
Month 78: 35 views
Month 79: 17 views
Month 80: 13 views
Month 81: 24 views
Month 82: 25 views
Month 83: 33 views
Month 84: 30 views
Month 85: 20 views
Month 86: 33 views
Month 87: 20 views
Month 88: 35 views
Month 89: 37 views
Month 90: 32 views
Month 91: 18 views
Month 92: 28 views
Month 93: 27 views
Month 94: 42 views
Month 95: 41 views
Month 96: 34 views
Month 97: 37 views
Month 98: 15 views
Month 99: 37 views
Month 100: 41 views
Month 101: 22 views
Month 102: 36 views
Month 103: 25 views
Month 104: 29 views
Month 105: 25 views
Month 106: 34 views
Month 107: 35 views
Month 108: 34 views
Month 109: 25 views
Month 110: 29 views
Month 111: 21 views
Month 112: 22 views
Month 113: 25 views
Month 114: 22 views
Month 115: 45 views
Month 116: 35 views
Month 117: 29 views
Month 118: 23 views
Month 119: 27 views
Month 120: 41 views
Month 121: 25 views
Month 122: 37 views
Month 123: 20 views
Month 124: 15 views
Month 125: 27 views
Month 126: 32 views
Month 127: 41 views
Month 128: 23 views
Month 129: 41 views
Month 130: 21 views
Month 131: 33 views
Month 132: 26 views
Month 133: 28 views
Month 134: 23 views
Month 135: 31 views
Month 136: 46 views
Month 137: 15 views
Month 138: 25 views
Month 139: 21 views
Month 140: 28 views
Month 141: 31 views
Month 142: 29 views
Month 143: 21 views
Month 144: 33 views
Month 145: 24 views
Month 146: 34 views
Month 147: 49 views
Month 148: 41 views
Month 149: 43 views
Month 150: 41 views
Month 151: 43 views
Month 152: 50 views
Month 153: 30 views
Month 154: 43 views
Month 155: 28 views
Month 156: 26 views
Month 157: 39 views
Month 158: 33 views
Month 159: 27 views
Month 160: 24 views
Month 161: 39 views
Month 162: 51 views
Month 163: 56 views
Month 164: 48 views
Month 165: 55 views
Month 166: 42 views

Total Views: 3.4K

Total Downloads: 200

All Trends