Impact of Mediatedrelations As Confounding Factor on Cohesion and Coupling Metrics: For Measuring Fault Proneness in OO Software Quality Assessment

Impact of Mediatedrelations As Confounding Factor on Cohesion and Coupling Metrics: For Measuring Fault Proneness in OO Software Quality Assessment

Amjan.Shaik

Contact

Dr.C.R.K.Reddy

Contact

Dr. A.Damodaram

Contact

α Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Hyderabad

Impact of Mediatedrelations As Confounding Factor on Cohesion and Coupling Metrics: For Measuring Fault Proneness in OO Software Quality Assessment

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

CSTSDE3I9AR

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

Mediated class relations and method calls as a confounding factor on coupling and cohesion metrics to assess the fault proneness of object oriented software is evaluated and proposed new cohesion and coupling metrics labeled as mediated cohesion (MCH) and mediated coupling (MCO) proposed. These measures differ from the majority of established metrics in two respects: they reflect the degree to which entities are coupled or resemble each other, and they take account of mediated relations in couplings or similarities. An empirical comparison of the new measures with eight established metrics is described. The new measures are shown to be consistently superior at measure the fault proneness.

References

24 Cites in Article

Reference Format

K Aggarwal,Yogesh Singh,Ruchikamalhotra Arvinderkaur (2005). Analysis of Object-Oriented Metrics.
Lionel Briand,John Daly,Jürgen Wüst (1998). A Unified Framework for Cohesion Measurement in Object-Oriented Systems.
L Briand,J Daly,J Wust (1999). A Unified Framework for Coupling Measurement in Object-Oriented Systems.
James Bieman,Byung-Kyoo Kang (1995). Cohesion and reuse in an object-oriented system.
M Cartwright,M Shepperd (2000). An Empirical Investigation of an Object-Oriented Software System.
S Chidamber,C Kemerer (1994). A metrics Suite for Object-Oriented Design.
S Chidamber,C Kemerer (1991). Towards a Metrics Suite for Object Oriented design.
R Harrison,S Counsell,R Nithi (1998). An evaluation of the MOOD set of object-oriented software metrics.
B Henderson-Sellers (1996). Object-Oriented Metrics, Measures of Complexity.
M Hitz,B Montazeri (1995). Measuring Coupling and Cohesion in Object-Oriented Systems.
A Lake,C Cook (1994). Use of factor analysis to develop OOP software complexity metrics.
Wei Li,Sallie Henry (1993). Object-oriented metrics that predict maintainability.
Y Lee,B Liang,S Wu,F Wang (1995). Measuring the Coupling and Cohesion of an Object-Oriented program based on Information flow.
M Lorenz,J Kidd (1994). Object-Oriented Software Metrics.
David Tegarden,Steven Sheetz,David Monarchi (1995). A software complexity model of object-oriented systems.
V Basili,L Briand,W Melo (1996). A Validation of Object-Oriented Design Metrics as Quality Indicators.
A Binkley,S Schach (1998). Validation of the coupling dependency metric as a predictor of run-time failures and maintenance measures.
L Briand,J Daly,V Porter,J Wust (2000). Exploring the relationships between design measures and software quality.
Lionel Briand,Jürgen Wüst,Hakim Lounis (2001). Replicated Case Studies for Investigating Quality Factors in Object-Oriented Designs.
S Chidamber,D Darcy,C Kemerer (1998). Managerial use of Metrics for Object-Oriented Software: An Exploratory Analysis.
Shashank Pant,Jack Wooldridge,Emma Seabrook,Julio Valdes,Marc Genest (1999). SHM to detect and characterize impact events in metallic aircraft structure.
Khaled El Emam,Walcelio Melo,Javam Machado (2001). The prediction of faulty classes using object-oriented design metrics.
T Gyimothy,R Ferenc,I Siket (2005). Empirical validation of object-oriented metrics on open source software for fault prediction.
Yu Ping,Ma Xiaoxing,Lujian Predicting Degree of Fault prone using OO Metrics: An Industrial Case Study.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Amjan.Shaik. 2012. \u201cImpact of Mediatedrelations As Confounding Factor on Cohesion and Coupling Metrics: For Measuring Fault Proneness in OO Software Quality Assessment\u201d. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology - C: Software & Data Engineering GJCST-C Volume 12 (GJCST Volume 12 Issue C13): .

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

Download Article

GJCST Volume 12 Issue C13
Pg. 49- 55

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjcst

Print ISSN 0975-4350

e-ISSN 0975-4172

Keywords

Not Found

Submission ReceivedDecember 6, 2011
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 1, 2012
Published January 15, 2012

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

September 6, 2012

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 113

Country: India

Subject: Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology - C: Software & Data Engineering

Authors: Amjan.Shaik, Dr.C.R.K.Reddy, Dr. A.Damodaram (PhD/Dr. count: 2)

View Count (all-time): 204

Total Views (Real + Logic): 10240

Total Downloads (simulated): 2627

Publish Date: 2012 09, Thu

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 56 views
Month 2: 18 views
Month 3: 39 views
Month 4: 48 views
Month 5: 52 views
Month 6: 58 views
Month 7: 33 views
Month 8: 24 views
Month 9: 43 views
Month 10: 52 views
Month 11: 45 views
Month 12: 39 views
Month 13: 37 views
Month 14: 37 views
Month 15: 31 views
Month 16: 34 views
Month 17: 29 views
Month 18: 37 views
Month 19: 33 views
Month 20: 40 views
Month 21: 27 views
Month 22: 38 views
Month 23: 37 views
Month 24: 36 views
Month 25: 27 views
Month 26: 36 views
Month 27: 46 views
Month 28: 24 views
Month 29: 31 views
Month 30: 27 views
Month 31: 24 views
Month 32: 30 views
Month 33: 24 views
Month 34: 23 views
Month 35: 43 views
Month 36: 37 views
Month 37: 30 views
Month 38: 36 views
Month 39: 25 views
Month 40: 19 views
Month 41: 32 views
Month 42: 34 views
Month 43: 25 views
Month 44: 48 views
Month 45: 36 views
Month 46: 28 views
Month 47: 44 views
Month 48: 24 views
Month 49: 41 views
Month 50: 28 views
Month 51: 19 views
Month 52: 33 views
Month 53: 45 views
Month 54: 40 views
Month 55: 38 views
Month 56: 44 views
Month 57: 43 views
Month 58: 23 views
Month 59: 20 views
Month 60: 20 views
Month 61: 31 views
Month 62: 18 views
Month 63: 23 views
Month 64: 44 views
Month 65: 25 views
Month 66: 43 views
Month 67: 34 views
Month 68: 26 views
Month 69: 28 views
Month 70: 29 views
Month 71: 28 views
Month 72: 34 views
Month 73: 26 views
Month 74: 36 views
Month 75: 38 views
Month 76: 45 views
Month 77: 39 views
Month 78: 20 views
Month 79: 39 views
Month 80: 17 views
Month 81: 30 views
Month 82: 33 views
Month 83: 16 views
Month 84: 45 views
Month 85: 24 views
Month 86: 29 views
Month 87: 32 views
Month 88: 18 views
Month 89: 45 views
Month 90: 26 views
Month 91: 46 views
Month 92: 13 views
Month 93: 44 views
Month 94: 40 views
Month 95: 24 views
Month 96: 22 views
Month 97: 31 views
Month 98: 27 views
Month 99: 26 views
Month 100: 19 views
Month 101: 37 views
Month 102: 43 views
Month 103: 35 views
Month 104: 24 views
Month 105: 34 views
Month 106: 28 views
Month 107: 43 views
Month 108: 28 views
Month 109: 30 views
Month 110: 31 views
Month 111: 29 views
Month 112: 35 views
Month 113: 17 views
Month 114: 25 views
Month 115: 43 views
Month 116: 27 views
Month 117: 23 views
Month 118: 19 views
Month 119: 29 views
Month 120: 36 views
Month 121: 32 views
Month 122: 18 views
Month 123: 31 views
Month 124: 24 views
Month 125: 21 views
Month 126: 34 views
Month 127: 16 views
Month 128: 16 views
Month 129: 10 views
Month 130: 34 views
Month 131: 33 views
Month 132: 35 views
Month 133: 23 views
Month 134: 40 views
Month 135: 22 views
Month 136: 20 views
Month 137: 18 views
Month 138: 17 views
Month 139: 42 views
Month 140: 15 views
Month 141: 35 views
Month 142: 37 views
Month 143: 30 views
Month 144: 33 views
Month 145: 23 views
Month 146: 33 views
Month 147: 39 views
Month 148: 33 views
Month 149: 36 views
Month 150: 32 views
Month 151: 29 views
Month 152: 40 views
Month 153: 30 views
Month 154: 36 views
Month 155: 17 views
Month 156: 22 views
Month 157: 32 views
Month 158: 43 views
Month 159: 12 views
Month 160: 19 views
Month 161: 54 views
Month 162: 34 views
Month 163: 29 views
Month 164: 37 views
Month 165: 39 views

Total Views: 10240

Total Downloads: 2627

2026 Trends

Published Article

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]