Impact of Personality Match/Mismatch on Employee Level Performance Which Ultimately Affects Organizational Performance

α
Dr. Sara Khan
Dr. Sara Khan
σ
Hira Amin
Hira Amin
ρ
Muqaddas Bin Tahir
Muqaddas Bin Tahir
α International Islamic University, Islamabad International Islamic University, Islamabad

Send Message

To: Author

Impact of Personality Match/Mismatch on Employee Level Performance Which Ultimately Affects Organizational Performance

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

U3WU2

Impact of Personality Match/Mismatch on Employee Level Performance Which Ultimately Affects Organizational Performance Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Abstract

The quality of the relationships employees have with each other determines the quality of the work outcomes. Personality of employees effects their roles and responsibilities in the organization. However, personality match between employee/employer has a strong impact on the interaction and communication patterns of the employees, as well as the subjective experiences of individuals which results in different forms of organizational integration and also in managing the interrelationships synergistically. On the other hand, every good employee that an organization fails to retain, walks out the door costing the business money, every poor or mismatched recruit can result in missed opportunities and can severely damage your culture and organizational reputation. Our paper is about how personalities matter in work environments and ultimately results in superior organizational performance. Too much difference among personalities at the work place creates difficulty in retaining employees. Mismatch can cause coordination problems.

References

31 Cites in Article
  1. A Caspi,T Moffit (1993). When Do Individual Differences Matter? A Paradoxical Theory of Personality Coherence.
  2. R Jacobson (1990). Unobservable Effects and Business Performance.
  3. Barry Staw,Robert Sutton,Lisa Pelled (1994). Employee Positive Emotion and Favorable Outcomes at the Workplace.
  4. M Ashton,C (1998). Personality and Job Performance: The Importance of Narrow Traits.
  5. M Robinson,D (2004). Personality as Performance: Categorization Tendencies and Their Correlates.
  6. Douglas Cellar,Stuart Sidle,Keith Goudy,Daniel O'brien (2001). Effects of Leader Style, Leader Sex, and Subordinate Personality on Leader Evaluations and Future Subordinate Motivation.
  7. Robert Tett,Patrick Murphy (2002). Personality and Situations in Co-worker Preference: Similarity and Complementarity in Worker Compatibility.
  8. L Burke,L Witt (2004). Personality and High-Maintenance Employee Behavior.
  9. Mark Smith,Jonathan Canger (2004). Effects of Supervisor “Big Five” Personality on Subordinate Attitudes.
  10. J Parkinson,S Taggar (2006). Intelligence, Personality and Performance on Case Studies.
  11. Jeremy Bernerth,Hubert Feild,William Giles,Michael Cole (2006). Perceived fairness in employee selection: the role of applicant personality.
  12. Aaron Bolin,George Neuman (2006). Personality, Process, and Performance in Interactive Brainstorming Groups.
  13. C Robie,D Brown,J Beaty,J,C (2007). Do People Fake on Personality Inventories? A Verbal Protocol Analysis.
  14. Anne Davis,Hannah Rothstein (2006). The Effects of the Perceived Behavioral Integrity of Managers on Employee Attitudes: A Meta-analysis.
  15. D Chauhan,S Chauhan,P (2006). Personality at Workplace.
  16. V Greaney (1974). Teachers' Perceptions of Pupil Personality.
  17. M Crant,T Bateman,S (2000). Charismatic Leadership Viewed from above: The Impact of Proactive Personality.
  18. Anusuiya Subramaniam,Rozhan Othman,Murali Sambasivan (2010). Implicit leadership theory among Malaysian managers.
  19. Manuel Guillén,Tomás González (2001). The Ethical Dimension of Managerial Leadership Two Illustrative Case Studies in TQM.
  20. Jane Howell,Boas Shamir (2005). The Role of Followers in the Charismatic Leadership Process: Relationships and Their Consequences.
  21. I Shani,A Somech (2011). Leadership, OCB and individual differences: Idiocentrism and allocentrism as moderators of the relationship between transformational and transactional leadership and OCB.
  22. Lale Gumusluoglu,Arzu Ilsev (2009). Transformational leadership, creativity, and organizational innovation.
  23. C Granrose,J Portwood (1987). MATCHING INDIVIDUAL CAREER PLANS AND ORGANIZATIONAL CAREER MANAGEMENT..
  24. Paul Nemiroff,David Ford (1976). Task Effectiveness and Human Fulfillment in Organizations: A Review and Development of a Conceptual Contingency Model..
  25. Jennifer Chatman,A (1989). Improving Interactional Organizational Research: A Model of Person-Organization Fit.
  26. Abraham Carmeli,John Schaubroeck,Asher Tishler (2011). How CEO empowering leadership shapes top management team processes: Implications for firm performance.
  27. J Rotemberg,J (1994). Human Relations in the Workplace.
  28. S Ghoshal,L Gratton (2002). The Emerging Agentic Enterprise: How Leaders Must Navigate a New Age of AI.
  29. L Burke,L Witt (2004). Personality and High-Maintenance Employee Behavior.
  30. James Avey,Bruce Avolio,Fred Luthans (2011). Experimentally analyzing the impact of leader positivity on follower positivity and performance.
  31. David Buss,Kenneth Craik (1983). The act frequency approach to personality..

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Dr. Sara Khan. 1970. \u201cImpact of Personality Match/Mismatch on Employee Level Performance Which Ultimately Affects Organizational Performance\u201d. Global Journal of Management and Business Research - A: Administration & Management GJMBR-A Volume 12 (GJMBR Volume 12 Issue A11): .

Download Citation

Issue Cover
GJMBR Volume 12 Issue A11
Pg. 61- 68
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJMBR

Print ISSN 0975-5853

e-ISSN 2249-4588

Keywords
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 20463
Total Downloads: 10578
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

The quality of the relationships employees have with each other determines the quality of the work outcomes. Personality of employees effects their roles and responsibilities in the organization. However, personality match between employee/employer has a strong impact on the interaction and communication patterns of the employees, as well as the subjective experiences of individuals which results in different forms of organizational integration and also in managing the interrelationships synergistically. On the other hand, every good employee that an organization fails to retain, walks out the door costing the business money, every poor or mismatched recruit can result in missed opportunities and can severely damage your culture and organizational reputation. Our paper is about how personalities matter in work environments and ultimately results in superior organizational performance. Too much difference among personalities at the work place creates difficulty in retaining employees. Mismatch can cause coordination problems.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Impact of Personality Match/Mismatch on Employee Level Performance Which Ultimately Affects Organizational Performance

Dr. Sara Khan
Dr. Sara Khan International Islamic University, Islamabad
Hira Amin
Hira Amin
Muqaddas Bin Tahir
Muqaddas Bin Tahir

Research Journals