Impact of Seismic load on Pier Forces in Different Type of RC Shear Walls in Concrete Frame Structures With Different Type of Soil Condition

Impact of Seismic load on Pier Forces in Different Type of RC Shear Walls in Concrete Frame Structures With Different Type of Soil Condition

Mahdi Hosseini Department of Civil Engineering, Ph.D., M.Tech., B.Engg., Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Hyderabad, Telangana, India

Contact

Prof.N.V.Ramana Rao

Contact

Nanjing Forestry University

Impact of Seismic load on Pier Forces in Different Type of RC Shear Walls in Concrete Frame Structures With Different Type of Soil Condition

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

11MNF

Impact of Seismic load on Pier Forces in Different Type of RC Shear Walls in Concrete Frame Structures With Different Type of Soil Condition Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

Shear walls are a type of structural system that provides lateral resistance to a building or structure. They resist in-plane loads that are applied along its height. The applied load is generally transferred to the wall by a diaphragm or collector or drag member. Shear walls are analyzed to resist two types of forces: shear forces and uplift forces. Shear forces are created throughout the height of the wall between the top and bottom shear wall connections. Uplift forces exist on shear walls because the horizontal forces are applied to the top of the wall. These uplift forces try to lift up one end of the wall and push the other end down. In some cases, the uplift force is large enough to tip the wall over. Shear walls are analyzed to the provide necessary lateral strength to resist horizontal forces.

References

17 Cites in Article

Reference Format

S Duggal (2010). Explicit Inelastic Dynamic Design Procedure for Earthquake Resistant Structures.
A Chopra (2012). Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Application to Earthquake Engineering.
Ananya Kumar,J Ranjan,B Tomar,Jameel Akhtar,Pragya Ranjan,Ritu Tiwari,Pradeep Kumar,Gayacharan Gayacharan,G Mishra,Suman Lata,Jogendra Singh (2000). A novel hydroponic approach for efficient screening and rapid phenotyping for identification of Fusarium wilt resistance in brinjal (Solanum melongena l.) and wild Solanum species.
(1993). Ductile detailing of reinforced concrete structures subjected to seismic forces-Code of Practice.
Unknown Title.
Ananya Kumar,J Ranjan,B Tomar,Jameel Akhtar,Pragya Ranjan,Ritu Tiwari,Pradeep Kumar,Gayacharan Gayacharan,G Mishra,Suman Lata,Jogendra Singh (2025). A novel hydroponic approach for efficient screening and rapid phenotyping for identification of Fusarium wilt resistance in brinjal (Solanum melongena l.) and wild Solanum species.
(2017). EN 1998‐1: Design Provisions for Steel Structures.
(2003). PEP Conceptual Design Report.
R Gary,Sigmund Scarer,Freeman (2004). Design drifts requirement for long period structures.
J Humar,S Yavari (2002). Design of concrete shear wall buildings for earthquake induced torsion". 4'1.
Jost Mo (1993). the seismic response of multistory reinforced concrete framed shear walls using a nonlinear model.
T Paulay,M Priestley (1992). Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings.
N Anand,C Mightraj,G Prince Arulraj (2010). Seismic behaviour of RCC shear wall under different soil conditions.
S Anshuman,Bhavin Dipendu Bhunia,Ramjiyani (2011). Solution of shear wall location in multistory building.
A Chandiwala (2008). Earthquake Analysis of Building Configuration with Different Position of Shear Wall.
P Chandurkar,Dr,P Pajgade (2013). Seismic analysis of RCC building with and without shear wall.
H Rahangdale,S Satone (2013). ANALYSIS OF MULTI-STORIED BUILDING OF VARYING THICKNESS OF SHEAR WALL ON SLOPING GROUND.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Mahdi Hosseini. 2018. \u201cImpact of Seismic load on Pier Forces in Different Type of RC Shear Walls in Concrete Frame Structures With Different Type of Soil Condition\u201d. Global Journal of Research in Engineering - E: Civil & Structural GJRE-E Volume 17 (GJRE Volume 17 Issue E4): .

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

Download Article

GJRE Volume 17 Issue E4
Pg. 11- 29

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjre

Print ISSN 0975-5861

e-ISSN 2249-4596

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJRE-E Classification: FOR Code: 290899

Submission ReceivedDecember 10, 2016
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 4, 2017
Published January 15, 2017

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

January 19, 2018

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 132

Country: China

Subject: Global Journal of Research in Engineering - E: Civil & Structural

Authors: Mahdi Hosseini, Prof.N.V.Ramana Rao (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 233

Total Views (Real + Logic): 3317

Total Downloads (simulated): 1642

Publish Date: 2018 01, Fri

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 60 views
Month 2: 51 views
Month 3: 35 views
Month 4: 57 views
Month 5: 48 views
Month 6: 31 views
Month 7: 34 views
Month 8: 33 views
Month 9: 46 views
Month 10: 48 views
Month 11: 41 views
Month 12: 33 views
Month 13: 46 views
Month 14: 35 views
Month 15: 18 views
Month 16: 43 views
Month 17: 35 views
Month 18: 24 views
Month 19: 20 views
Month 20: 33 views
Month 21: 45 views
Month 22: 26 views
Month 23: 42 views
Month 24: 25 views
Month 25: 45 views
Month 26: 28 views
Month 27: 20 views
Month 28: 32 views
Month 29: 23 views
Month 30: 35 views
Month 31: 23 views
Month 32: 29 views
Month 33: 27 views
Month 34: 32 views
Month 35: 26 views
Month 36: 34 views
Month 37: 23 views
Month 38: 33 views
Month 39: 36 views
Month 40: 34 views
Month 41: 26 views
Month 42: 28 views
Month 43: 37 views
Month 44: 23 views
Month 45: 23 views
Month 46: 48 views
Month 47: 46 views
Month 48: 22 views
Month 49: 24 views
Month 50: 34 views
Month 51: 18 views
Month 52: 36 views
Month 53: 20 views
Month 54: 23 views
Month 55: 18 views
Month 56: 32 views
Month 57: 48 views
Month 58: 17 views
Month 59: 25 views
Month 60: 33 views
Month 61: 25 views
Month 62: 22 views
Month 63: 44 views
Month 64: 36 views
Month 65: 33 views
Month 66: 23 views
Month 67: 33 views
Month 68: 22 views
Month 69: 50 views
Month 70: 30 views
Month 71: 35 views
Month 72: 34 views
Month 73: 13 views
Month 74: 27 views
Month 75: 17 views
Month 76: 27 views
Month 77: 16 views
Month 78: 13 views
Month 79: 37 views
Month 80: 32 views
Month 81: 41 views
Month 82: 30 views
Month 83: 27 views
Month 84: 28 views
Month 85: 26 views
Month 86: 30 views
Month 87: 29 views
Month 88: 31 views
Month 89: 31 views
Month 90: 46 views
Month 91: 44 views
Month 92: 27 views
Month 93: 23 views
Month 94: 28 views
Month 95: 32 views
Month 96: 25 views
Month 97: 21 views
Month 98: 39 views
Month 99: 42 views

Total Views: 3317

Total Downloads: 1642

2026 Trends

Published Article

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]