Improving Ieee 802.11 Wlan Handoff Latency by Access Point-Based Modification

Nidhi Sanghavi; Rajesh S. Bansode

Improving Ieee 802.11 Wlan Handoff Latency by Access Point-Based Modification

Nidhi Sanghavi * §

Contact

Rajesh S. Bansode §

Contact

§ Mumbai University

Improving Ieee 802.11 Wlan Handoff Latency by Access Point-Based Modification

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

CSTNWS6Z22J

Improving Ieee 802.11 Wlan Handoff Latency by Access Point-Based Modification Banner

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant

This converted HTML version may contain rendering inconsistencies. Please refer to the PDF for the authoritative version, or click here to provide feedback.

Abstract

IEEE 802.11 WLAN provides multimedia services like live telecast, video streaming, video conferencing, Voice over IP (VoIP) to its users. For deployment of these fast real time services, it needs stringent Quality of service (QoS) requirement such as delay time less than 150ms for VoIP, and packet loss rate of 1%. The mobility service for users come with cost of handoff process required when mobile stations get connected from 1 Access point (AP) to another for continuous service. In existing 802.11 IEEE handoff procedure, the scanning phase can exceed duration of 200ms and packet loss can exceed 10%. Thus, proposed methodology focuses on achieving reduced overall handoff latency by implementing handoff delay duration less than 150ms which is the need for seamless service in IEEE 802.11 WLAN.

References

13 Cites in Article

Reference Format

1. Hongqiang Zhai,Xiang Chen,Yuguang Fang (2005). How well can the IEEE 802.11 wireless LAN support quality of service?. IEEE Trans. Wireless Communications, 4, 3084-3094.
2. A Mishra,M Shin,W Arbaugh (2003). An empirical analysis of the IEEE 802.11 MAC layer handoff process. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev, 33(2), 93-102.
3. Yogesh Powar,Varsha Apte (2009). Improving the IEEE 802.11 MAC Layer Handoff Latency to Support Multimedia Traffic. 2009 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 1-6.
4. Minho Shin,Arunesh Mishra,William Arbaugh (2004). Improving the latency of 802.11 handoffs using neighbor graphs. Proc. MobiSys '04: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services, 70-88.
5. I Ramani,S Savage (2005). SyncScan: practical fast handoff for 802.11 infrastructure networks. Proceedings IEEE 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies., 1, 675-684.
6. V Khare,B Zhang (2009). Towards Economically Viable Infrastructure-Based Overlay Multicast Networks. IEEE INFOCOM 2009, 1989-1997.
7. (1990). Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM '90. The Conference on Computer Communications. Ninth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communication Societies. The Multiple Facets of Integration (Cat. No.90CH2826-5). Proceedings. IEEE INFOCOM '90: Ninth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies@m_The Multiple Facets of Integration, 1, 0_1.
8. A Mishra,V Brik,S Banerjee (2005). Eliminating handoff latencies in 802.11 WLANS using multiple radios: Applications, experience, and evaluation. Eliminating handoff latencies in 802.11 WLANS using multiple radios: Applications, experience, and evaluation
9. Sunggeun Jin,Munhwan Choi,Lei Wang,Sunghyun Choi (2011). Fast scanning schemes for IEEE 802.11 WLANs in virtual AP environments. Computer Networks, 55(10), 2520-2533.
10. Y Grunenberger,F Rousseau (2010). Virtual access points for transparent mobility in wireless LANs. Proc. IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 1-6.
11. S Jin,M Choi,S Choi (2009). Multiple WNIC-based handoff in IEEE 802.11 WLANs. IEEE Communication Letters, 13(10), 751-754.
12. Yi-Cheng Chan,Dai-Jiong Lin The Design of an AP-Based Handoff Scheme for. IEEE, 802(11)
13. Wlans (2014). Unknown Title. J.e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, 4(1)

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Nidhi Sanghavi, Rajesh S. Bansode. 2015. "Improving Ieee 802.11 Wlan Handoff Latency by Access Point-Based Modification". Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology - E: Network, Web & Security GJCST-E Volume 15 (GJCST Volume 15 Issue E5).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJCST Volume 15 Issue E5

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjcst

Print ISSN 0975-4350

e-ISSN 0975-4172

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJCST-E Classification C.2.6

Submission ReceivedFebruary 6, 2015
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted February 28, 2015
Published September 5, 2015

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

September 5, 2015

Language

English

Order Article Reprint

Experience in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 102

Country: India

Subject: Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology - E: Network, Web & Security

Authors: Nidhi Sanghavi, Rajesh S. Bansode (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 516

Total Views (Real + Logic): 2531

Total Downloads (simulated): 207

Publish Date: 2015 03, Sun

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 31 views
Month 2: 44 views
Month 3: 31 views
Month 4: 20 views
Month 5: 47 views
Month 6: 41 views
Month 7: 41 views
Month 8: 49 views
Month 9: 50 views
Month 10: 51 views
Month 11: 35 views
Month 12: 32 views
Month 13: 20 views
Month 14: 31 views
Month 15: 48 views
Month 16: 32 views
Month 17: 46 views
Month 18: 31 views
Month 19: 39 views
Month 20: 46 views
Month 21: 36 views
Month 22: 17 views
Month 23: 39 views
Month 24: 36 views
Month 25: 28 views
Month 26: 24 views
Month 27: 37 views
Month 28: 30 views
Month 29: 15 views
Month 30: 14 views
Month 31: 21 views
Month 32: 20 views
Month 33: 33 views
Month 34: 24 views
Month 35: 38 views
Month 36: 40 views
Month 37: 32 views
Month 38: 41 views
Month 39: 25 views
Month 40: 20 views
Month 41: 29 views
Month 42: 49 views
Month 43: 20 views
Month 44: 19 views
Month 45: 45 views
Month 46: 42 views
Month 47: 31 views
Month 48: 16 views
Month 49: 25 views
Month 50: 24 views
Month 51: 47 views
Month 52: 21 views
Month 53: 39 views
Month 54: 41 views
Month 55: 39 views
Month 56: 30 views
Month 57: 32 views
Month 58: 43 views
Month 59: 38 views
Month 60: 39 views
Month 61: 31 views
Month 62: 37 views
Month 63: 40 views
Month 64: 42 views
Month 65: 19 views
Month 66: 28 views
Month 67: 17 views
Month 68: 27 views
Month 69: 42 views
Month 70: 45 views
Month 71: 39 views
Month 72: 35 views
Month 73: 44 views
Month 74: 24 views
Month 75: 34 views
Month 76: 36 views
Month 77: 16 views
Month 78: 32 views
Month 79: 35 views
Month 80: 39 views
Month 81: 20 views
Month 82: 42 views
Month 83: 35 views
Month 84: 22 views
Month 85: 27 views
Month 86: 22 views
Month 87: 25 views
Month 88: 28 views
Month 89: 25 views
Month 90: 37 views
Month 91: 28 views
Month 92: 31 views
Month 93: 32 views
Month 94: 37 views
Month 95: 19 views
Month 96: 20 views
Month 97: 23 views
Month 98: 26 views
Month 99: 17 views
Month 100: 48 views
Month 101: 29 views
Month 102: 26 views
Month 103: 34 views
Month 104: 34 views
Month 105: 14 views
Month 106: 19 views
Month 107: 31 views
Month 108: 25 views
Month 109: 36 views
Month 110: 22 views
Month 111: 13 views
Month 112: 28 views
Month 113: 35 views
Month 114: 27 views
Month 115: 26 views
Month 116: 34 views
Month 117: 21 views
Month 118: 43 views
Month 119: 38 views
Month 120: 18 views
Month 121: 37 views
Month 122: 21 views
Month 123: 29 views
Month 124: 31 views
Month 125: 51 views
Month 126: 63 views
Month 127: 37 views
Month 128: 55 views
Month 129: 35 views
Month 130: 44 views
Month 131: 39 views
Month 132: 29 views
Month 133: 15 views
Month 134: 26 views
Month 135: 46 views
Month 136: 30 views
Month 137: 30 views
Month 138: 51 views
Month 139: 58 views
Month 140: 52 views

Total Views: 2.5K

Total Downloads: 207

All Trends