In Vitro Comparison of Friction Generated by Various Models of Self-Ligating and Conventional Brackets while Performing Retraction with Sliding Mechanics

In Vitro Comparison of Friction Generated by Various Models of Self-Ligating and Conventional Brackets while Performing Retraction with Sliding Mechanics

Mario Cappellette Jr PhD, DDS http://lattes.cnpq.br/3772804052798387

Contact

Universidade Federal de São Paulo

In Vitro Comparison of Friction Generated by Various Models of Self-Ligating and Conventional Brackets while Performing Retraction with Sliding Mechanics

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

VZ81Y

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

References

22 Cites in Article

Reference Format

Referências Bibliográficas (null). REFERÊNCIAS BIBLIOGRÁFICAS.
M; Barlow,K Kula (2008). Factors influencing efficiency of sliding mechanics to close extraction space: a systematic review.
S; Ehsani,M; Mandich,T El-Bialy (2009). Frictional resistence in self-ligating orthodontic brackets and conventionally ligated brackets. A sistematic review.
S Burrow (2009). Friction and resistance to sliding in orthodontics: A critical review.
Lorenzo Franchi,Tiziano Baccetti,Matteo Camporesi,Ersilia Barbato (2008). Forces released during sliding mechanics with passive self-ligating brackets or nonconventional elastomeric ligatures.
N Turnbull,D Birnie (2007). Treatment efficiency of conventional vs self-ligating brackets: effects of archwire size and material.
S Chen,G Greenlee,J Kim,C Smith,G Huang (2010). Systematic review of self-ligating brackets.
Maria Monteiro,Licinio Silva,Carlos Elias,Oswaldo Vilella (2014). Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations.
Manu Krishnan,Sukumaran Kalathil,Kurian Abraham (2009). Comparative evaluation of frictional forces in active and passive self-ligating brackets with various archwire alloys.
Kartik Dholakia,Shweta Bhat (2012). Clinical efficiency of nonconventional elastomeric ligatures in the canine retraction phase of preadjusted edgewise appliance therapy: An in-vivo study.
Y Al-Thomali,R Mohamed,S Basha (2017). Torque expression in self-ligating orthodontic brackets and conventionally ligated brackets: A systematic review.
J C Bennet,R Mclaughlin Controlled space closure with a preajusted appliance system.
M Martins (2008). Proposição de dispositivos para testes de atrito e força para sistemas de arcos.
Max Hain,Ashish Dhopatkar,Peter Rock (2003). The effect of ligation method on friction in sliding mechanics.
Max Hain,Ashish Dhopatkar,Peter Rock (2006). A comparison of different ligation methods on friction.
W Bussab,P Morettin (2006). Estatística Básica.
S Siegel (2006). Estatística não-paramétrica para ciências do comportamento.
S; Budd,J Daskalogiannakis,B Tompson (2008). A study of the frictional characteristics of four commercially available self-ligating bracket systems.
Benjamin Pliska,Rick Fuchs,John Beyer,Brent Larson (2014). Effect of applied moment on resistance to sliding among esthetic self-ligating brackets.
Renata Leal,Flávia Amaral,Fabiana França,Roberta Basting,Cecilia Turssi (2014). Role of lubricants on friction between self-ligating brackets and archwires.
P Miles (2007). Self-ligating vs conventional twin brackets during en-masse space closure with sliding mechanics.
Sennay Stefanos,Antonino Secchi,Guy Coby,Nipul Tanna,Francis Mante (2010). Friction between various self-ligating brackets and archwire couples during sliding mechanics.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Mario Cappellette Jr. 2017. \u201cIn Vitro Comparison of Friction Generated by Various Models of Self-Ligating and Conventional Brackets while Performing Retraction with Sliding Mechanics\u201d. Global Journal of Medical Research - J: Dentistry & Otolaryngology GJMR-J Volume 17 (GJMR Volume 17 Issue J2).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJMR Volume 17 Issue J2

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjmra

Print ISSN 0975-5888

e-ISSN 2249-4618

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJMR-J Classification NLMC Code: WU1

Submission ReceivedDecember 9, 2016
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 3, 2017
Published January 15, 2017

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

November 13, 2017

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 101

Country: Unknown

Subject: Global Journal of Medical Research - J: Dentistry & Otolaryngology

Authors: Mario Cappellette Jr (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 171

Total Views (Real + Logic): 3357

Total Downloads (simulated): 1650

Publish Date: 2017 11, Mon

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 17 views
Month 2: 45 views
Month 3: 51 views
Month 4: 47 views
Month 5: 27 views
Month 6: 46 views
Month 7: 32 views
Month 8: 41 views
Month 9: 40 views
Month 10: 46 views
Month 11: 51 views
Month 12: 44 views
Month 13: 35 views
Month 14: 26 views
Month 15: 17 views
Month 16: 15 views
Month 17: 15 views
Month 18: 29 views
Month 19: 25 views
Month 20: 46 views
Month 21: 18 views
Month 22: 29 views
Month 23: 27 views
Month 24: 31 views
Month 25: 27 views
Month 26: 34 views
Month 27: 25 views
Month 28: 37 views
Month 29: 22 views
Month 30: 37 views
Month 31: 17 views
Month 32: 43 views
Month 33: 42 views
Month 34: 21 views
Month 35: 31 views
Month 36: 21 views
Month 37: 34 views
Month 38: 24 views
Month 39: 15 views
Month 40: 40 views
Month 41: 47 views
Month 42: 34 views
Month 43: 33 views
Month 44: 41 views
Month 45: 32 views
Month 46: 18 views
Month 47: 34 views
Month 48: 18 views
Month 49: 38 views
Month 50: 38 views
Month 51: 42 views
Month 52: 30 views
Month 53: 21 views
Month 54: 14 views
Month 55: 13 views
Month 56: 39 views
Month 57: 25 views
Month 58: 37 views
Month 59: 45 views
Month 60: 36 views
Month 61: 27 views
Month 62: 40 views
Month 63: 24 views
Month 64: 32 views
Month 65: 34 views
Month 66: 16 views
Month 67: 29 views
Month 68: 32 views
Month 69: 39 views
Month 70: 22 views
Month 71: 17 views
Month 72: 12 views
Month 73: 47 views
Month 74: 23 views
Month 75: 38 views
Month 76: 36 views
Month 77: 36 views
Month 78: 47 views
Month 79: 43 views
Month 80: 22 views
Month 81: 21 views
Month 82: 30 views
Month 83: 39 views
Month 84: 31 views
Month 85: 30 views
Month 86: 25 views
Month 87: 22 views
Month 88: 14 views
Month 89: 33 views
Month 90: 36 views
Month 91: 37 views
Month 92: 25 views
Month 93: 37 views
Month 94: 32 views
Month 95: 36 views
Month 96: 26 views
Month 97: 39 views
Month 98: 32 views
Month 99: 37 views
Month 100: 45 views
Month 101: 30 views
Month 102: 49 views

Total Views: 3357

Total Downloads: 1650

2026 Trends

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]