In Vitro Fermentation of Rice Bran by Ruminococcus Sp. for Desirable Chemical Changes as Feed for Livestock

α
Muhammad Ashiqul Alam
Muhammad Ashiqul Alam
σ
M S R Khan
M S R Khan
ρ
K M S Islam
K M S Islam
Ѡ
U Dickhofer
U Dickhofer
¥
M A Grashorn
M A Grashorn
α Bangladesh Agricultural University Bangladesh Agricultural University

Send Message

To: Author

In Vitro Fermentation of Rice Bran by Ruminococcus Sp. for Desirable Chemical Changes as Feed for Livestock

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

U53A3

In Vitro Fermentation of Rice Bran by Ruminococcus Sp. for Desirable Chemical Changes as Feed for Livestock Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Abstract

Using rice bran in broiler diets has limitation due higher content of fiber and lower availability of few micronutrients including phosphorus. So, they were fermented anaerobically using 10% Ruminococcus albus isolated from rumen of cattle to get fermented value-added feed ingredient. It was fermented for 48 hours at 39 °C giving 60% moisture at different conditions like FRB (Rice Bran treated with Ruminococcus sp.), UFRB (Rice Bran treated with 2.0% urea using Ruminococcus sp.), MFRB (Rice Bran treated with 5.0% molasses using Ruminococcus sp.), UMFRB (Rice bran treated with 2% urea & 5% molasses using Ruminococcus sp.). The protein content was increased in UFRB (18.43%), UMFRB (17.19%) in comparison to RB group (14.42%) where UFRB showed highest crude protein (p

References

53 Cites in Article
  1. Aoac (2005). Report of the Committee on editing tentative and official methods of analysis, the Association of official agricultural chemists..
  2. K Amaefule,Nwogu Rk,N Ohazuluike (2003). Influence of treatment of rice mill waste on its nutritional value for broilers.
  3. F Abd-Elaziem,A Thoufeek,Smh Anis,Othman Alzahrani (2017). Autolysis of Rice Bran Phytate in Long-Term Study on Batch Fermentor.
  4. M Bryant,L Burkey (1953). Cultural methods and some characteristics of some of the more numerous groups of bacteria in the bovine rumen.
  5. M Bryant,N Small,C Bouma,I Robinson (1958). Characteristics of ruminal anaerobic cellulolytic cocci and Cilliobacterium cellulosolvens n. sp.
  6. Marvin Bryant (1959). BACTERIAL SPECIES OF THE RUMEN.
  7. I Bidura,I Mahardika,B Suyadnya,I Partama,D Oka (2012). The implementation of Saccharomyces spp.n-2 isolates culture (isolation from traditional yeast culture) for improving feed quality and performance of male Bali ducking.
  8. F Cao,X Zhang,W Yu,L Zhao,T Wang (2012). Effect of feeding fermented Ginkgo biloba leaves on growth performance, meat quality, and lipid metabolism in broilers.
  9. Junqin Chen,Paul Weimer (2001). Competition among three predominant ruminal cellulolytic bacteria in the absence or presence of non-cellulolytic bacteria.
  10. M Bedford,G Patridge (2001). Enzymes in farm animal nutrition.
  11. B Dehority,H Scott (1967). Extent of cellulose and hemicellulose digestion in various forages by pure cultures of cellulolytic rumen bacteria.
  12. David Duncan (1955). Multiple Range and Multiple F Tests.
  13. H Flint,E Bayer,R Lamed,B White (2008). Polysaccharide utilization by gut bacteria: potential for new insights from genomic analysis.
  14. Harry Flint,Edward Bayer (2008). <i>Plant Cell Wall Breakdown by Anaerobic Microorganisms from the Mammalian Digestive Tract</i>.
  15. J Fontenot,K Webb (1983). Health Aspects of Recycling Animal Wastes by Feeding.
  16. David Farrell (1994). Utilization of rice bran in diets for domestic fowl and ducklings.
  17. D Hardini (2010). the nutritive evaluation of fermented rice bran as poultry feed.
  18. Veronique Julliand,Albane De Vaux,Liliane Millet,Gerard Fonty (1999). Identification of <i>Ruminococcus flavefaciens</i> as the Predominant Cellulolytic Bacterial Species of the Equine Cecum.
  19. Satoshi Koike,Yuko Shingu,Hiroyuki Inaba,Masahito Kawai,Yasuo Kobayashi,Hiroshi Hata,Keiichi Tanaka,Masahiko Okubo (2000). Fecal Bacteria in Hokkaido Native Horses as Characterized by Microscopic Enumeration and Competitive Polymerase Chain Reaction Assays..
  20. S Koike,Y Kobayashi (2001). Development and use of competitive PCR assays for the rumen cellulolytic bacteria: Fibrobacter succinogenes, Ruminococcus albus and Ruminococcus flavefaciens.
  21. S Khan,R Haroon,Yasser,M Saleem,J Tariq (2013). The effect of phytase enzyme on the performance of broilers.
  22. Y Kim,J Lee,H Kim,J Yu,T Oh (1998). Cloning of the thermostable phytase gene (phy) from Bacillus sp. DS11 and its overexpression in Escherichia coli.
  23. S Khin,B Azhar,I Aini,Che Rs (2011). Effect of Fermented Rice Bran, Bio-Converted Byproduct on Performance of Broiler Chickens.
  24. A Khalique,K Lone,T Pasha,A Khan (2003). Chemical composition and Nutritional evaluation of variously treated defatted rice polishing for broiler feeding.
  25. I Kompiang,A Sinurat,P Supriyat (1995). The effect of using protein enriched Sago and its byproducts in comparison with fermented cassava fiber in the rations on the performance of broiler chickens.
  26. C Kim,G-B Kim,M Chang,G Bae,I Paik,D Kil (2012). Effect of dietary supplementation of Lactobacillus-fermented Artemisia princeps on growth performance, meat lipid peroxidation, and intestinal microflora in Hy-line Brown male chickens.
  27. M Latta,M Eskin (1980). A simple and rapid colorimetric method for phytate determination.
  28. Yu-Ling Lee,Joan-Hwa Yang,Jeng-Leun Mau (2008). Antioxidant properties of water extracts from Monascus fermented soybeans.
  29. H Gado,H Metwally,H Soliman,R Etab,Abd El-Galil (2007). Effect of Treatment By Cellulolytic Bacteria On Nutritive Value Of Corn Stalks And On Some Rumen And Blood Parameters Of Sheep.
  30. R Hungate (1950). THE ANAEROBIC MESOPHILIC CELLULOLYTIC BACTERIA.
  31. R Hungate (1966). The Rumen and its Microbes.
  32. D Morse,H Head,C Wilcox (1992). Disappearance of Phosphorus in Phytate from Concentrates In Vitro and from Rations Fed to Lactating Dairy Cows.
  33. K Mackenzie,M Kenny (1965). NON-VOLATILE ORGANIC ACID AND pH CHANGES DURING THE FERMENTATION OF DISTILLER'S WORT.
  34. R Muthukrishnan (2007). Characterisation of Cellulase from Organisms Isolated From Rumen Fluid.
  35. S Ndams,Tsb Tegbe,S Ogundipe (2009). Effects of feeding graded levels of re-fermented brewers' dried grains on performance and carcass characteristics of broiler chickens.
  36. L Pelizer,M Pontieri,I Moraes (2007). Utilização de Resíduos Agro-Industriais em Processos Biotecnológicos como Perspectiva de Redução do Impacto Ambiental.
  37. A Prabhu,C Mrudula,J Rajesh (2014). Effect of yeast fermentation on nutraceutical and antioxidant properties of rice bran.
  38. V Ravindran,W Bryden,E Kornegay (1995). Phytates: occurrence, and implications in poultry nutrition.
  39. A Sijpesteijn (1951). On Ruminococcus flavefaciens, a Cellulose-decomposing:Bacterium from the Rumen of Sheep and Cattle.
  40. Kompiang Supriyati,Ip (2002). Change of nutrient composition of fermented cassava skin tubers and its utilization in broiler rations.
  41. Y Sukaryana (2001). Effect of Fermentation of Palm Oil-cake with Trichoderma viride on Change of Chemical Composition, bio-conversion efficiency, and the Food and metabolizable energy in broiler chickens.
  42. Rgd Steel,J Torrie (1980). Principles and Procedures of Statistics.
  43. Sisca Tirajoh,W Piliang,P Ketaren (2010). The suplementation of fibre degrading enzymes and phytase in poultry diet on the performance of broiler chickens.
  44. K Tajima,R Aminov,T Nagamine,H Matsui,M Nakamura,Y Benno (2001). Diet-Dependent Shifts in the Bacterial Population of the Rumen Revealed with Real-Time PCR.
  45. M Ukil (1999). Rice bran for broiler chicken (finisher) ration and utilization of phytate phosphorus.
  46. A Vohra,T Satyanarayana (2003). Phytases: Microbial sources, production, purification, and potential biotechnological applications.
  47. B Warren,D Farrell (1990). The nutritive value of full fat and defatted Australian rice bran. I. Chemical composition.
  48. Abbas Wizna,Y Rizal,A Djulardi,H Muis (2012). The effect of supplementation of micro nutrient on nutrient rice bran which fermented by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens.
  49. Abbas Wizna,Y Rizal,A Dharma,I Kompiang (2009). Improving the quality of tapioca by-products (onggok) as poultry feed through fermentation by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens.
  50. Rong-Fu Wang,Wei-Wen Cao,Carl Cerniglia (1997). PCR detection ofRuminococcusspp. in human and animal faecal samples.
  51. C Wang,H Lin,S Wu (2011). Influence of dietary supplementation with Bacillus-fermented adlay on lipid metabolism, antioxidant status and intestinal microflora in hamsters.
  52. L Yanke,H Bae,L Selinger,K Cheng (1998). Phytase activity of anaerobic ruminal bacteria.
  53. Fakhar-Un-Nisa Yunus,Muhammad Nadeem,Farzana Rashid (2015). Single-cell protein production through microbial conversion of lignocellulosic residue (wheat bran) for animal feed.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Muhammad Ashiqul Alam. 2020. \u201cIn Vitro Fermentation of Rice Bran by Ruminococcus Sp. for Desirable Chemical Changes as Feed for Livestock\u201d. Global Journal of Medical Research - G: Veterinary Science & Medicine GJMR-G Volume 20 (GJMR Volume 20 Issue G1): .

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjmra

Print ISSN 0975-5888

e-ISSN 2249-4618

Keywords
Classification
GJMR-G Classification: NLMC Code: QW 4
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

May 4, 2020

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 2343
Total Downloads: 1172
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

Using rice bran in broiler diets has limitation due higher content of fiber and lower availability of few micronutrients including phosphorus. So, they were fermented anaerobically using 10% Ruminococcus albus isolated from rumen of cattle to get fermented value-added feed ingredient. It was fermented for 48 hours at 39 °C giving 60% moisture at different conditions like FRB (Rice Bran treated with Ruminococcus sp.), UFRB (Rice Bran treated with 2.0% urea using Ruminococcus sp.), MFRB (Rice Bran treated with 5.0% molasses using Ruminococcus sp.), UMFRB (Rice bran treated with 2% urea & 5% molasses using Ruminococcus sp.). The protein content was increased in UFRB (18.43%), UMFRB (17.19%) in comparison to RB group (14.42%) where UFRB showed highest crude protein (p

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

In Vitro Fermentation of Rice Bran by Ruminococcus Sp. for Desirable Chemical Changes as Feed for Livestock

Muhammad Ashiqul Alam
Muhammad Ashiqul Alam Bangladesh Agricultural University
M S R Khan
M S R Khan
K M S Islam
K M S Islam
U Dickhofer
U Dickhofer
M A Grashorn
M A Grashorn

Research Journals