Incidence and Outcome of Second Branchial Cleft Anomalies: A Three Years Experience and Appreciation

α
Dr. A H M Delwar
Dr. A H M Delwar
α Chittagong Medical University

Send Message

To: Author

Incidence and Outcome of Second Branchial Cleft Anomalies: A Three Years Experience and Appreciation

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

PIU8F

Incidence and Outcome of Second Branchial Cleft Anomalies: A Three Years Experience and Appreciation Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Abstract

Background: Second branchial cleft anomalies are remarkable of all other inborn errors of branchial apparatus. As a congenital, it may be presented at birth but usually manifests in early teenagers and young adults. Like all other inborn errors, it is better to correct earlier before suffering from any complications. Methods: It is a cohort retrospective study of 15 cases in the Department of Otolaryngology and Head-Neck Surgery, Cumilla Medical College, and Cumilla Medical Centre, Bangladesh, from 01 July 2016 to 31 June 2019. Results: Incidence of anomalies among routine ENT operations was 0.21%. Of 15, the cyst was 04(26.27%), sinus was 10(66.66%), the fistula was 1(6.67%), children were 09(60%), the adult was 6(40%), and young adult and an early teenager were 07(46.66%), male was 11(75.33%), and females were 04(26.27%), bilateral were 2(13.33%), unilateral was 13(86.67%) in which right was 10(76.33%), and left was 03(23.08%), painful cyst with abscess was 01(6.67%), the painless cyst was 03(20%), sinus with the mucoid fluid discharge was 07(46.68%), painful sinus with mucopurulent discharge and skin-excoriation was 03(20%), painful fistula with mucopurulent discharge and skin-excoriation was 01(6.67%), postoperative wound infection was 2(13.33%). Recurrence and the branchio-oto-renal syndrome were absent in our study.

References

28 Cites in Article
  1. Stephanie Acierno,John Waldhausen (2007). Congenital Cervical Cysts, Sinuses and Fistulae.
  2. S Silverberg (2006). Silverberg's Prnciple and Practice of Surgical Pathology and Cytopathology.
  3. G Keith,Luke Trimble,Mccadden Cysts and Sinuses of the Head and Neck.
  4. Achih Chen,Mary Francis,Li Ni,Cor Cremers,William Kimberling,Yutaka Sato,Peter Phelps,Susan Bellman,Michael Wagner,Marcus Pembrey,Richard Smith (1995). Phenotypic manifestations of branchiootorenal syndrome.
  5. M Kemperman,C Stickens,S Kumar,F Joosten,P Huygen,C Cremers (2002). The branchio-oto-renal syndrome.
  6. H Baily (1929). Branchial Cysts and other Essays on Surgical Subjects in the Facio Cervical Region.
  7. Cornelius Sedgwick,Joseph Walsh (1952). Branchial cysts and fistulas.
  8. John Waldhausen (2006). Branchial cleft and arch anomalies in children.
  9. A Singh,V Kumar,V Narula,R Meher,Raj (2012). Bilateral first and second arch anomalies: A rare presentation.
  10. H Neel,J Pemberton (1945). Lateral cervical cysts and fistulas surgery.
  11. Jonathan Golledge,Harold Ellis (1994). The aetiology of lateral cervical (branchial) cysts: past and present theories.
  12. Sukgi Choi,George Zalzal (1995). Branchial anomalies: A review of 52 cases.
  13. M Mitroi,D Dumitrescu,C Simionescu,C Popescu,C Mogoanta,L Cioroianu,C Surlin,A Capitanescu,M Georgescu (2008). Management of second branchial cleft anomalies.
  14. Vijay Kalra,Kamal Rattan,Samar Yadav,Sandeep Bhukar,S Dheeraj (2017). Second Branchial Anomalies: A Study of 94 Cases.
  15. Robert Telander,Howard Filston (1992). Review of Head and Neck Lesions in Infancy and Childhood.
  16. R Karabulut,K Sonmez,Z Turkyilmaz,I Ozen,B Demirogullari,M Guclu,A Basaklar,N Kale (2005). Second branchial anomalies in children.
  17. Roger Simpson (1969). Lateral cervical cysts and fistulas.
  18. E Faerben,J Swartz (1991). Imaging of neck masses in infants and children.
  19. G Ford,A Balakrishnan,J Evans,C Bailey (1992). Branchial cleft and pouch anomalies.
  20. Francisco Agaton-Bonilla,Cosme Gay-Escoda (1996). Diagnosis and treatment of branchial cleft cysts and fistulae. A retrospective study of 183 patients.
  21. P Som (1987). Cystic Lesions of the neck.
  22. J-N Bruneton,D Fenart (1987). Other Cervical Sites.
  23. I Celis,E Bijnens,P Peene,P Cleeren (1998). The use of preoperative fistulography in patients with a second branchial cleft anomaly.
  24. M Benson,K Dalen,A Mancuso,H Kerr,A Cacciarelli,M Mafee (1992). Congenital anomalies of the branchial apparatus: embryology and pathologic anatomy..
  25. M Miller,V Rao,B Tom (1992). Cystic masses of the head and neck: Pitfalls in CT and MRI interpretation.
  26. F Daoud (2005). Branchial Cyst: An Often Forgotten Diagnosis.
  27. David Mandell (2000). Head and Neck Anomalies Related to the Branchial Apparatus.
  28. Sampath Prasad,Arun Azeez,Nikhil Thada,Pallavi Rao,Andrea Bacciu,Kishore Prasad (2014). Branchial Anomalies: Diagnosis and Management.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Dr. A H M Delwar. 2020. \u201cIncidence and Outcome of Second Branchial Cleft Anomalies: A Three Years Experience and Appreciation\u201d. Global Journal of Medical Research - J: Dentistry & Otolaryngology GJMR-J Volume 20 (GJMR Volume 20 Issue J3): .

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjmra

Print ISSN 0975-5888

e-ISSN 2249-4618

Keywords
Classification
GJMR-J Classification: NLMC Code: QS 675
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

May 23, 2020

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 2115
Total Downloads: 1059
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

Background: Second branchial cleft anomalies are remarkable of all other inborn errors of branchial apparatus. As a congenital, it may be presented at birth but usually manifests in early teenagers and young adults. Like all other inborn errors, it is better to correct earlier before suffering from any complications. Methods: It is a cohort retrospective study of 15 cases in the Department of Otolaryngology and Head-Neck Surgery, Cumilla Medical College, and Cumilla Medical Centre, Bangladesh, from 01 July 2016 to 31 June 2019. Results: Incidence of anomalies among routine ENT operations was 0.21%. Of 15, the cyst was 04(26.27%), sinus was 10(66.66%), the fistula was 1(6.67%), children were 09(60%), the adult was 6(40%), and young adult and an early teenager were 07(46.66%), male was 11(75.33%), and females were 04(26.27%), bilateral were 2(13.33%), unilateral was 13(86.67%) in which right was 10(76.33%), and left was 03(23.08%), painful cyst with abscess was 01(6.67%), the painless cyst was 03(20%), sinus with the mucoid fluid discharge was 07(46.68%), painful sinus with mucopurulent discharge and skin-excoriation was 03(20%), painful fistula with mucopurulent discharge and skin-excoriation was 01(6.67%), postoperative wound infection was 2(13.33%). Recurrence and the branchio-oto-renal syndrome were absent in our study.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Incidence and Outcome of Second Branchial Cleft Anomalies: A Three Years Experience and Appreciation

Dr. A H M Delwar
Dr. A H M Delwar Chittagong Medical University

Research Journals