Incidence of Carcinoma of the Prostate in Patients with Normal Prostatic Specific Antigen Following Prostatectomy

Incidence of Carcinoma of the Prostate in Patients with Normal Prostatic Specific Antigen Following Prostatectomy

Elaimam Ibrahim Mohmmed Elaimam

Contact

Abdel Raof Sharfi

Contact

Sudan Medical Specialization Board

Incidence of Carcinoma of the Prostate in Patients with Normal Prostatic Specific Antigen Following Prostatectomy

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

3364G

Incidence of Carcinoma of the Prostate in Patients with Normal Prostatic Specific Antigen Following Prostatectomy Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

References

30 Cites in Article

Reference Format

A Jemal,T Murray,E Ward,A Samuels,R Tiwari,A Ghafoor,E Feuer,M Thun (2005). Cancer statistics, 2005.
Wakaik (2005). Descriptive epidemiology of prostate cancer in Japan and Western countries (in Japanese).
A Abdelkarim,Abdrabo,I Adil,Fadlalla,M Imad,Fadl-Elmul (2011). Siglen und Abkürzungen.
R Siegel Cancer statistics, 2011: the impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths.
M Djulbegovic,R Beyth,M Neuberger,T Stoffs,J Vieweg,B Djulbegovic,P Dahm (2011). Screening for prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
P Beuzeboc,M Soulié,P Richaud,L Salomon,F Staerman,M Peyromaure,P Mongiat-Artus,F Cornud,P Paparel,J Davin,V Molinié Fusion genes and 7. prostate cancer. From discovery to prognosis and therapeutic perspectives.
I Van Der Cruijsen-Koeter,A Vis,M Roobol,M Wildhagen,H De Koning,T Van Der Kwast,F Schroder (2005). Comparison of screen detected and clinically diagnosed prostate cancer in the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer, section Rotterdam.
(2001). American Cancer Society Guidelines for the Early Detection of Cancer.
A Partin,H Carter,D Chan,J Epstein,J Oesterling,R Rock (1990). PSA in staging of localized prostate cancer. Influence of tumour differentiation, tumour volume and BPH.
Carter (2000). Carter HB: A PSA threshold of 4.0 ng/mL for early detection of prostate cancer: The only rational approach for men 50 years old and older.
El Imam (2009). Prostate Specific Antigenversus Digital Rectal Examination as screening for ca prostate in Sudanese patients Sudanese.
A Abdelkarim,Adil Abdrabo,M Fadlallaimad,Fadl-Elmula (2011). Unknown Title.
Alexandre Pelzer,Ashutosh Tewari,Jasmin Bektic,Andreas Berger,Ferdinand Frauscher,Georg Bartsch,Wolfgang Horninger (2005). Detection rates and biologic significance of prostate cancer with PSA less than 4.0 ng/mL: Observation and clinical implications from Tyrol screening project.
E Deantoni,E Crawford,J Oesterling (1996). Age and race-specific reference ranges for prostatespecific antigen from a large community-based study.
Ted Morgan,Steven Jacobsen,William Mccarthy,Debra Jacobson,David Mcleod,Judd Moul (1996). Age-Specific Reference Ranges for Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen in Black Men.
A Abdrabo,A Fadlalla,Im:Pub Fadl-Elmula,Med (2011). Age-specific reference range for serum prostatespecific antigen in Sudanese men.
William Hamilton (2005). What are the clinical features of lung cancer before the diagnosis is made? A population based case-control study.
Farmer (2001). Aio minute consultation :prostatic symptoms.
R,Runtinexaertgeersb Vencastresv the diagnosis value of macroscopic haematuria for diagnosis of urological cancer in geralpractice.
P Leeuwen,M Roobol,Schr ِder Fh (2010). Early detection and screening for prostate cancer.
Richard Martin,Lars Vatten,David Gunnell,Pål Romundstad (2010). Blood pressure and risk of prostate cancer: cohort Norway (CONOR).
Jason Krumholtz,Gustavo Carvalhal,Christian Ramos,Deborah Smith,Phataraporn Thorson,Yan Yan,Peter Humphrey,Kimberly Roehl,William Catalona (2002). Prostate-specific antigen cutoff of 2.6 ng/mL for prostate cancer screening is associated with favorable pathologic tumor features.
H Fritz,Schröder ArtoBoekenKruger:JNCI Evaluation of the Digital Rectal Examination as a Screening Test for Prostate Cancer.
El Imam (2009). Prostate Specific Antigenversus Digital Rectal Examination as screening for ca prostate in Sudanese patients Sudanese.
A Abdelkarim,Adil Abdrabo,M Fadlallaimad,Fadl-Elmula (2011). Unknown Title.
H Jewett (1956). Significance of the palpable prostatic nodule.
Tineke Wolters,Monique Roobol,Pim Van Leeuwen,Roderick Van Den Bergh,Robert Hoedemaeker,Geert Van Leenders,Fritz Schröder,Theodorus Van Der Kwast (2010). A Critical Analysis of the Tumor Volume Threshold for Clinically Insignificant Prostate Cancer Using a Data Set of a Randomized Screening Trial.
William Catalona,M’liss Hudson,Peter Scardino,Jerome Richie,Frederick Ahmann,Robert Flanigan,Jean Dekernion,Timothy Ratliff,Louis Kavoussi,Bruce Dalkin,W Waters,Michael Macfarlane,Paula Southwick (1994). Selection of Optimal Prostate Specific Antigen Cutoffs for Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves.
O Okotie,K Roehl,M Han,S Loeb,S Gashti,W Catalona (2007). Characteristics of prostatecancer detected by digital rectal examination only.
Thompson Iamm,Donna,Pauler,Good Phyllisj,Man Prevalence of prostate cancer among men with aprostate specific antigen level> 4ng/ml.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Elaimam Ibrahim Mohmmed Elaimam. 2013. \u201cIncidence of Carcinoma of the Prostate in Patients with Normal Prostatic Specific Antigen Following Prostatectomy\u201d. Unknown Journal GJMR-I Volume 13 (GJMR Volume 13 Issue I3).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJMR Volume 13 Issue I3

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Keywords

Not Found

Submission ReceivedApril 10, 2013
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted May 5, 2013
Published May 15, 2013

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

October 31, 2013

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 72

Country: Sudan

Subject: Uncategorized

Authors: Elaimam Ibrahim Mohmmed Elaimam, Abdel Raof Sharfi (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 147

Total Views (Real + Logic): 4874

Total Downloads (simulated): 2430

Publish Date: 2013 10, Thu

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 22 views
Month 2: 54 views
Month 3: 41 views
Month 4: 54 views
Month 5: 56 views
Month 6: 36 views
Month 7: 45 views
Month 8: 47 views
Month 9: 35 views
Month 10: 21 views
Month 11: 34 views
Month 12: 21 views
Month 13: 34 views
Month 14: 48 views
Month 15: 33 views
Month 16: 22 views
Month 17: 16 views
Month 18: 39 views
Month 19: 19 views
Month 20: 15 views
Month 21: 42 views
Month 22: 34 views
Month 23: 14 views
Month 24: 42 views
Month 25: 35 views
Month 26: 34 views
Month 27: 24 views
Month 28: 29 views
Month 29: 25 views
Month 30: 36 views
Month 31: 33 views
Month 32: 19 views
Month 33: 16 views
Month 34: 24 views
Month 35: 32 views
Month 36: 36 views
Month 37: 45 views
Month 38: 25 views
Month 39: 46 views
Month 40: 29 views
Month 41: 35 views
Month 42: 30 views
Month 43: 27 views
Month 44: 42 views
Month 45: 30 views
Month 46: 19 views
Month 47: 43 views
Month 48: 24 views
Month 49: 33 views
Month 50: 36 views
Month 51: 28 views
Month 52: 44 views
Month 53: 34 views
Month 54: 43 views
Month 55: 34 views
Month 56: 34 views
Month 57: 37 views
Month 58: 26 views
Month 59: 34 views
Month 60: 23 views
Month 61: 27 views
Month 62: 23 views
Month 63: 21 views
Month 64: 19 views
Month 65: 39 views
Month 66: 40 views
Month 67: 42 views
Month 68: 24 views
Month 69: 32 views
Month 70: 24 views
Month 71: 32 views
Month 72: 39 views
Month 73: 38 views
Month 74: 18 views
Month 75: 42 views
Month 76: 37 views
Month 77: 24 views
Month 78: 23 views
Month 79: 24 views
Month 80: 24 views
Month 81: 33 views
Month 82: 36 views
Month 83: 30 views
Month 84: 15 views
Month 85: 37 views
Month 86: 31 views
Month 87: 25 views
Month 88: 23 views
Month 89: 33 views
Month 90: 17 views
Month 91: 37 views
Month 92: 34 views
Month 93: 34 views
Month 94: 33 views
Month 95: 29 views
Month 96: 39 views
Month 97: 42 views
Month 98: 35 views
Month 99: 44 views
Month 100: 25 views
Month 101: 28 views
Month 102: 17 views
Month 103: 18 views
Month 104: 41 views
Month 105: 32 views
Month 106: 42 views
Month 107: 30 views
Month 108: 14 views
Month 109: 34 views
Month 110: 26 views
Month 111: 41 views
Month 112: 18 views
Month 113: 24 views
Month 114: 30 views
Month 115: 12 views
Month 116: 28 views
Month 117: 31 views
Month 118: 17 views
Month 119: 35 views
Month 120: 25 views
Month 121: 14 views
Month 122: 31 views
Month 123: 32 views
Month 124: 34 views
Month 125: 36 views
Month 126: 31 views
Month 127: 47 views
Month 128: 25 views
Month 129: 31 views
Month 130: 39 views
Month 131: 28 views
Month 132: 45 views
Month 133: 26 views
Month 134: 36 views
Month 135: 18 views
Month 136: 35 views
Month 137: 44 views
Month 138: 25 views
Month 139: 24 views
Month 140: 18 views
Month 141: 40 views
Month 142: 44 views
Month 143: 29 views
Month 144: 25 views
Month 145: 41 views
Month 146: 34 views
Month 147: 52 views
Month 148: 42 views
Month 149: 41 views
Month 150: 44 views
Month 151: 36 views

Total Views: 4874

Total Downloads: 2430

2026 Trends

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]