Influence of Reducing Herbicides Rates in Washington Navel Orange Trees

1
Dr. A.A.A. Hassan
Dr. A.A.A. Hassan
1 Botany Department National Research Center, Cairo, Egypt

Send Message

To: Author

GJSFR Volume 12 Issue D5

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

1BLTX

Influence of Reducing Herbicides Rates in Washington Navel Orange Trees Banner
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

This study was carried out during two successive seasons 2007 and 2008 on 25 years old Washington Navel orange trees Citrus sinensis L.; budded on sour orange root stock growing in a private orchard. To study influence of reducing herbicides rates in Washington Navel orange trees. The present investigation covered the effect of some herbicides with two rates for each (recommended dose and half of recommended dose + 4Kg urea /fed) as well as hand hoeing on controlling weeds spread in citrus orchard. There was a significant depression in fresh weight of grass, broad leaved and total weeds with hand hoeing and herbicides treatments (Touchdown, Fluazifop-butyl and Pendimethalin with recommended and half recommended dose + 4Kg urea/fed) when compared with unweeded treatment. the urea to a half recommended dose of herbicides gave the same effect of the recommended dose of herbicides to broad -leaved and grass weeds in citrus orchard and none showed any phylotoxic effect on the foliage of citrus plants. Pendimethalin IL + 4 Kg urea / fed treatment gave the highest yield / tree when compared with other herbicides treatments.

15 Cites in Articles

References

  1. D Duncan (1955). Multiple range and multiple. tests.
  2. M El -Shamma,A A A Hassan (2001). A comparative study of some weed control methods on Thompson seedless vines.
  3. Renan Gravena,Ricardo Victoria Filho,Pedro Alves,Paulo Mazzafera,Adriana Gravena (2009). Low glyphosate rates do not affect <i>Citrus limonia</i> (L.) Osbeck seedlings.
  4. A Hassan,Abd El -Naby,S (1998). Response of Washington naval orange trees and associated weeds to weed control methods.
  5. . Hassan,. El-Shahawy,. Metwely,G (2006). Annual and perennial weed control in citrus orchard.
  6. Johannes Scholberg,Gregory Macdonald (2004). Preliminary evaluation of non synthetic herbicides for weed management in organic orange production.
  7. H Kalita,R Bhattacharyya (1995). Differential expression of Citrus tristeza virus across various age groups of Assam lemon (Citrus limon Burm.).
  8. H Kalita,R Bhattachryyu (1997). Differential expression of Citrus tristeza virus across various age groups of Assam lemon (Citrus limon Burm.).
  9. Onur Koloren,F Uygur (2006). Investigation on Weed Control Methods in Citrus Orchard in Cukurova Region-Turkey.
  10. F Liu,Neil O’connell (2003). Movement of simazine in runoff water and weed control from citrus orchard as affected by reduced rate of herbicide application.
  11. N O'connell,R Snyder (2004). MONITORING SOIL MOISTURE WITH INEXPENSIVE DIALECTRIC SENSORS (ECHOPROBE) IN A CITRUS ORCHARD UNDER LOW VOLUME IRRIGATION.
  12. V S Rao (2000). Principle of weed science.
  13. Stephen Deitz,Hugo Ramirez (2000). Herbicide Adjuvants. Proceedings of a Symposium of the Weed Science Society of America February 8, 2000, Toronto, Canada.
  14. G Snedecor,W Cochran (1980). Statistical Methods.
  15. Yang -Yisong,Wang -Han,Chen-Xin Tang -Jian Jun (2007). Effect of weed management practices on orchard soil biological and fertility properties in southeastern China Soil -and.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

Dr. A.A.A. Hassan. 2012. \u201cInfluence of Reducing Herbicides Rates in Washington Navel Orange Trees\u201d. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - D: Agriculture & Veterinary GJSFR-D Volume 12 (GJSFR Volume 12 Issue D5): .

Download Citation

Issue Cover
GJSFR Volume 12 Issue D5
Pg. 23- 28
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJSFR

Print ISSN 0975-5896

e-ISSN 2249-4626

Classification
Not Found
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

May 5, 2012

Language

English

Experiance in AR

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Read in 3D

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 5371
Total Downloads: 2585
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research

Published Article

This study was carried out during two successive seasons 2007 and 2008 on 25 years old Washington Navel orange trees Citrus sinensis L.; budded on sour orange root stock growing in a private orchard. To study influence of reducing herbicides rates in Washington Navel orange trees. The present investigation covered the effect of some herbicides with two rates for each (recommended dose and half of recommended dose + 4Kg urea /fed) as well as hand hoeing on controlling weeds spread in citrus orchard. There was a significant depression in fresh weight of grass, broad leaved and total weeds with hand hoeing and herbicides treatments (Touchdown, Fluazifop-butyl and Pendimethalin with recommended and half recommended dose + 4Kg urea/fed) when compared with unweeded treatment. the urea to a half recommended dose of herbicides gave the same effect of the recommended dose of herbicides to broad -leaved and grass weeds in citrus orchard and none showed any phylotoxic effect on the foliage of citrus plants. Pendimethalin IL + 4 Kg urea / fed treatment gave the highest yield / tree when compared with other herbicides treatments.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]
×

This Page is Under Development

We are currently updating this article page for a better experience.

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Influence of Reducing Herbicides Rates in Washington Navel Orange Trees

Dr. A.A.A. Hassan
Dr. A.A.A. Hassan Botany Department National Research Center, Cairo, Egypt

Research Journals