Innovation and Performance during the Financial Crisis

1
Emira Houaneb
Emira Houaneb
2
Rim Benhassen
Rim Benhassen
1 University of Tunis

Send Message

To: Author

GJMBR Volume 18 Issue C6

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

C: FINANCEQE004

Innovation and Performance during the Financial Crisis Banner
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

This research is a contribution to establish an empirical background on the capacity for innovation in French firms listed on the SBF 120 covering the period before and after the financial crisis. The purpose of this research paper is to analyze the factors that influence the capacity for innovation and to prove the existence of a possible relationship between the innovation capacity and the performance. Firstly, the study reveals that research and development expenditure has a negative impact on the financial performance of SBF 120 firms during the period from 2004 to 2016. Secondly, this negative relationship between performance and innovation persists during the pre and post financial crisis period.

51 Cites in Articles

References

  1. N Ammon (1998). Why Hedge?-A Critical Review of Theory and Empirical Evidence.
  2. Arash Azadegan (2011). BENEFITING FROM SUPPLIER OPERATIONAL INNOVATIVENESS: THE INFLUENCE OF SUPPLIER EVALUATIONS AND ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY.
  3. P Berrone,A Fosfuri,L Gelabert,L Gomez-Mejia (2013). Necessity as the mother of 'green' inventions: Institutional pressures and environmental innovations.
  4. P Bhagat,R Garg (2008). Road to Open Innovation: A Model of Technological Innovativeness of Youth.
  5. Olivier Blanchard,Florencio Lopez-De-Silanes,Andrei Shleifer (1994). What do firms do with cash windfalls?.
  6. James Brown,Steven Fazzari,Bruce Petersen (2009). Financing Innovation and Growth: Cash Flow, External Equity, and the 1990s R&D Boom.
  7. J Brown,B Petersen (2009). Why has the investment -cash flow sensitivity declined so sharply? Rising R&D and equity market developments.
  8. Bert Jacobs (2002). Can the Addis Ababa Action Agenda Bring about a More Integrated Blend? Facilitating African Infrastructure Development Through Institutionalized Portfolio Approaches.
  9. G Charreaux,P Desbrières (2001). Corporate governance: Stakeholder value versus shareholder value.
  10. Thomas Chemmanur,Yawen Jiao (2012). Dual class IPOs: A theoretical analysis.
  11. Raymond Cox,Ajit Dayanandan,Han Donker,John Nofsinger (2017). The Bad, the boom and the bust: Profit warnings over the business cycle.
  12. Dirk Czarnitzki,Kornelius Kraft (2003). Unternehmensleitung und Innovationserfolg / Corporate Management and Innovation.
  13. Patricia Dechow,Weili Ge,Catherine Schrand (2010). Understanding earnings quality: A review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences.
  14. Alpa Dhanani,Suzanne Fifield,Christine Helliar,Lorna Stevenson (2007). Why UK companies hedge interest rate risk.
  15. Y Ding,H Stolowy (2003). Stratégie genevoise pour la région paneuropéenne en matière de transports, de santé et d’environnement.
  16. David Evans,Boyan Jovanovic (1989). An Estimated Model of Entrepreneurial Choice under Liquidity Constraints.
  17. Eugene Fama,Michael Jensen (1983). Separation of Ownership and Control.
  18. Audley Genus,Anne-Marie Coles (2008). Rethinking the multi-level perspective of technological transitions.
  19. S Goldberg,E Drogt (2008). Managing foreign exchange risk.
  20. Jian Guan,Richard Yam,Esther Tang,Antonio Lau (2009). Innovation strategy and performance during economic transition: Evidences in Beijing, China.
  21. G Gunday,G Ulusoy,K Kilic,L Alpkan (2011). Effects of innovation types on firm performance.
  22. Ertan Gündüz (2013). The Competitive Tension as a Moderator for Strategic Innovation.
  23. Manak Gupta (1969). THE EFFECT OF SIZE, GROWTH, AND INDUSTRY ON THE FINANCIAL STRUCTURE OF MANUFACTURING COMPANIES*.
  24. Nile Hatch,Jeffrey Dyer (2004). Human capital and learning as a source of sustainable competitive advantage.
  25. Charles Hill,Scott Snell (1988). External control, corporate strategy, and firm performance in research‐intensive industries.
  26. R Hoskisson,L Eden,C Lau,M Wright (2000). STRATEGY IN EMERGING ECONOMIES..
  27. P-H Hsu,X Tian,Y Xu (2014). Financial development and innovation: Cross-country evidence.
  28. W Huang,H Zheng,W-M Chia (2010). Financial crises and interacting heterogeneous agents.
  29. Hans Hvide,Jarle Møen (2007). Lean and Hungry or Fat and Content? Entrepreneurs' Wealth and Start-Up Performance.
  30. M Jensen (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers.
  31. M Jensen,W Meckling (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure.
  32. Antonio Lau,Managing (2009). Managing modular product design: Critical factors and a managerial guide.
  33. Panagiotis Liargovas,Konstantinos Skandalis (2010). The impact of leverage and other key variables on business performance: evidence from Greece.
  34. Klaus Meyer,Mike Peng (2005). Probing theoretically into Central and Eastern Europe: transactions, resources, and institutions.
  35. Hyman Minsky (1986). The Evolution of Financial Institutions and the Performance of the Economy.
  36. Federico Munari (2002). The effects of privatization on corporate R&D units: evidence from Italy and France.
  37. Federico Munari (2003). Does Ownership Affect Innovation? Assessing the Impact of Privatisation Processes on Innovation Activities.
  38. David North,David Smallbone,Ian Vickers (2001). Public Sector Support for Innovating SMEs.
  39. A Orléan (2009). De l'euphorie à la panique: Penser la crise financière.
  40. Mike Peng,Yuan Lu,Oded Shenkar,Denis Wang (2001). Treasures in the China house: a review of management and organizational research on Greater China.
  41. L Pi,S Timme (1993). Corporate control and bank efficiency.
  42. Paula Rechner,Dan Dalton (1991). CEO duality and organizational performance: A longitudinal analysis.
  43. Joseph Schumpeter (1947). Theoretical Problems of Economic Growth.
  44. M Shubita,J Alsawalhah (2012). The relationship between capital structure and profitability.
  45. K-H Tsai,J-C Wang (2009). External technology sourcing and innovation performance in LMT sectors: An analysis based on the Taiwanese Technological Innovation Survey.
  46. Catherine Wang,Pervaiz Ahmed (2004). The development and validation of the organisational innovativeness construct using confirmatory factor analysis.
  47. James Westphal,Edward Zajac (1995). Who Shall Govern? CEO/Board Power, Demographic Similarity, and New Director Selection.
  48. Richard Yam,William Lo,Esther Tang,Antonio Lau (2011). Analysis of sources of innovation, technological innovation capabilities, and performance: An empirical study of Hong Kong manufacturing industries.
  49. Jie Yang (2010). The knowledge management strategy and its effect on firm performance: A contingency analysis.
  50. K-P Yang,Y-C Chiao,C-C Kuo (2010). The relationship between R&D investment and firm profitability under a three-stage sigmoid curve model: evidence from an emerging economy.
  51. H Zeng (2014). Financial constraints, antitakeover protection, and corporate innovation: An empirical analysis using antitakeover legislation.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

Emira Houaneb. 2018. \u201cInnovation and Performance during the Financial Crisis\u201d. Global Journal of Management and Business Research - C: Finance GJMBR-C Volume 18 (GJMBR Volume 18 Issue C6): .

Download Citation

Issue Cover
GJMBR Volume 18 Issue C6
Pg. 45- 51
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJMBR

Print ISSN 0975-5853

e-ISSN 2249-4588

Keywords
Classification
GJMBR-C Classification: JEL Code: B26, C23, C58, G01, G32, L25, O16, O39
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

November 14, 2018

Language

English

Experiance in AR

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Read in 3D

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 2839
Total Downloads: 1393
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research

Published Article

This research is a contribution to establish an empirical background on the capacity for innovation in French firms listed on the SBF 120 covering the period before and after the financial crisis. The purpose of this research paper is to analyze the factors that influence the capacity for innovation and to prove the existence of a possible relationship between the innovation capacity and the performance. Firstly, the study reveals that research and development expenditure has a negative impact on the financial performance of SBF 120 firms during the period from 2004 to 2016. Secondly, this negative relationship between performance and innovation persists during the pre and post financial crisis period.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]
×

This Page is Under Development

We are currently updating this article page for a better experience.

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Innovation and Performance during the Financial Crisis

Emira Houaneb
Emira Houaneb University of Tunis
Rim Benhassen
Rim Benhassen

Research Journals