Intensive Interaction and Alternative Communication Interventions: A Comparative Literature Review in Autism Spectrum Disorder

1
Dr. Marina Pantazi
Dr. Marina Pantazi

Send Message

To: Author

GJHSS Volume 25 Issue A6

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

EMWA5

Intensive Interaction and Alternative Communication Interventions: A Comparative Literature Review in Autism Spectrum Disorder Banner
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

This article reviews and compares key intervention methods for Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), including Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA), TEACCH, SCERTS, and Intensive Interaction. The purpose of the study is to examine the theoretical foundations, methods of implementation, and document advantages and limitations of each approach, with particular emphasis on the unique contribution of Intensive Interaction. A narrative review of the literature highlights that while ABA, TEACCH, and SCERTS have strong applications in skill development, structured teaching, and emotional regulation, Intensive Interaction stands out for its highly person-centered and relational focus. Findings indicate that no single intervention can meet the diverse needs of all individuals with ASD. Instead, combining methods according to developmental profiles, communication abilities, and family contexts may provide the most beneficial outcomes.

Article file ID not found.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

Dr. Marina Pantazi. 2026. \u201cIntensive Interaction and Alternative Communication Interventions: A Comparative Literature Review in Autism Spectrum Disorder\u201d. Global Journal of Human-Social Science - A: Arts & Humanities GJHSS-A Volume 25 (GJHSS Volume 25 Issue A6): .

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Keywords
Classification
Not Found
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

November 11, 2025

Language

English

Experiance in AR

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Read in 3D

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 104
Total Downloads: 25
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research

Published Article

This article reviews and compares key intervention methods for Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), including Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA), TEACCH, SCERTS, and Intensive Interaction. The purpose of the study is to examine the theoretical foundations, methods of implementation, and document advantages and limitations of each approach, with particular emphasis on the unique contribution of Intensive Interaction. A narrative review of the literature highlights that while ABA, TEACCH, and SCERTS have strong applications in skill development, structured teaching, and emotional regulation, Intensive Interaction stands out for its highly person-centered and relational focus. Findings indicate that no single intervention can meet the diverse needs of all individuals with ASD. Instead, combining methods according to developmental profiles, communication abilities, and family contexts may provide the most beneficial outcomes.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]
×

This Page is Under Development

We are currently updating this article page for a better experience.

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Intensive Interaction and Alternative Communication Interventions: A Comparative Literature Review in Autism Spectrum Disorder

Dr. Marina Pantazi
Dr. Marina Pantazi

Research Journals