Inter-Observer Variation in the Grading of Meningiomas using the WHO Classification of CNS Tumors Criteria

Article ID

9278L

Inter-Observer Variation in the Grading of Meningiomas using the WHO Classification of CNS Tumors Criteria

Hisham Alkhalidi
Hisham Alkhalidi King Saud University
DOI

Abstract

Background: Grading of meningiomas using the World health organization (WHO) Classification of the Central Nervous System criteria currently has an essential role in classification, treatment, prognosis prediction, and research of these tumors. Aims: This is a retrospective study that assessed the interobserver variation between Anatomical Pathologists in grading meningiomas using material obtained from ten resection specimens. The WHO grading system includes different methods, including the mitotic count, the tumor subtypes or the presence of three out of five certain morphological features. This paper focuses on the interobserver variability in the latter method. Methods: Meningiomas that were originally graded based upon mitoses, brain invasion, or morphological subtype were excluded. Ten different Anatomical Pathologists, including two Neuropathologists, who were blinded to the original diagnosis and grade graded the tumors independently.

Inter-Observer Variation in the Grading of Meningiomas using the WHO Classification of CNS Tumors Criteria

Background: Grading of meningiomas using the World health organization (WHO) Classification of the Central Nervous System criteria currently has an essential role in classification, treatment, prognosis prediction, and research of these tumors. Aims: This is a retrospective study that assessed the interobserver variation between Anatomical Pathologists in grading meningiomas using material obtained from ten resection specimens. The WHO grading system includes different methods, including the mitotic count, the tumor subtypes or the presence of three out of five certain morphological features. This paper focuses on the interobserver variability in the latter method. Methods: Meningiomas that were originally graded based upon mitoses, brain invasion, or morphological subtype were excluded. Ten different Anatomical Pathologists, including two Neuropathologists, who were blinded to the original diagnosis and grade graded the tumors independently.

Hisham Alkhalidi
Hisham Alkhalidi King Saud University

No Figures found in article.

Hisham Alkhalidi. 2020. “. Global Journal of Medical Research – C: Microbiology & Pathology GJMR-C Volume 20 (GJMR Volume 20 Issue C3): .

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjmra

Print ISSN 0975-5888

e-ISSN 2249-4618

Classification
GJMR-C Classification: NLMC Code: QW 4
Keywords
Article Matrices
Total Views: 2220
Total Downloads: 1066
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research
Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Inter-Observer Variation in the Grading of Meningiomas using the WHO Classification of CNS Tumors Criteria

Hisham Alkhalidi
Hisham Alkhalidi King Saud University

Research Journals