Intrusion Detection in Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN)

1
Srinivasaraju Dantuluri
Srinivasaraju Dantuluri
2
P Poturaju
P Poturaju
1 Grandhi Varalakshmi Venkatrao Institute of Technology, affiliated to JNTUK

Send Message

To: Author

GJCST Volume 13 Issue E7

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

CSTNWS9R440

Intrusion Detection in Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) Banner
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Intrusion detection in Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) is of practical interest in many applications such as detecting an intruder in a combat zone. The intrusion detection is defined as machinery for a WSN to detect the subsistence of unfortunate, incorrect, or anomalous moving attackers. For this purpose, it is a fundamental issue to differentiate the WSN parameters such as node density and sensing range in terms of a desirable detection probability. In this paper, we consider this issue according to two WSN models: homogeneous and heterogeneous WSN. Furthermore, we derive the detection possibility by considering two sensing models: single-singing detection and multiple-sensing detection. In addition, we converse the network connectivity and broadcast reach ability, which are necessary conditions to make certain the corresponding detection probability in a WSN. Our simulation results validate the analytical values for both homogeneous and heterogeneous WSNs.

18 Cites in Articles

References

  1. I Akyildiz,W Su,Y Sankarasubramaniam,E Cayirci (2002). A Survey on Sensor Networks.
  2. J Lee,B Krishnamachari,C Kuo (2004). Impact of Heterogeneous Deployment on Lifetime Sensing Coverage in Sensor Networks.
  3. W Hu,C Chou,S Jha,N Bulusu (2006). Deploying Long-Lived and Cost-effective Hybrid Sensor Networks.
  4. P Silva,M Martins,B Rocha,A Loureiro,L Ruiz,H Wong Decentralized intrusion detection in wireless sensor networks.
  5. I Onat,A Miri (2005). An intrusion detection system for wireless sensor networks.
  6. A Perrig (2002). SPINS: Security Protocols for Sensor Networks.
  7. S Zhu,S Setia,S Jajodia (2003). LEAP: Efficient Security Mechanisms for Large-scale Distributed Sensor Networks.
  8. Jing Deng,Richard Han,Shivakant Mishra (2003). A Performance Evaluation of Intrusion-Tolerant Routing in Wireless Sensor Networks.
  9. Y Wang,X Wang,B Xie,D Wang,D (2008). Intrusion detection in homogeneous and heterogeneous wireless sensor networks.
  10. O Dousse,C Tavoularis,P Thiran (2006). Delay of intrusion detection in wireless sensor networks.
  11. H Kung,D Vlah (2003). Efficient location tracking using sensor networks.
  12. C.-Y Lin,W.-C Pang,Y.-C Tseng (2006). Efficient innetwork moving object tracking in wireless sensor networks.
  13. Y Zhang,W Lee (2000). Intrusion Detection in Wireless Ad-Hoc Networks.
  14. Benyuan Liu,Peter Brass,Olivier Dousse,Philippe Nain,Don Towsley (2005). Mobility improves coverage of sensor networks.
  15. Y Wang,X Wang,B Xie,D Wang,D (2008). Intrusion detection in homogeneous and heterogeneous wireless sensor networks.
  16. Yun Wang,Yoon Leow,Jun Yin (2009). Is Straight-line Path Always the Best for Intrusion Detection in Wireless Sensor Networks.
  17. Xi Peng,Zheng Wu,Debao Xiao,Yang Yu (2009). Study on Security Management Architecture for Sensor Network based on Intrusion Detection.
  18. Hossein Jadidoleslamy (2013). A High-level Architecture for Intrusion Detection on Heterogeneous Wireless Sensor Networks: Hierarchical, Scalable and Dynamic Reconfigurable.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

Srinivasaraju Dantuluri. 2013. \u201cIntrusion Detection in Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN)\u201d. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology - E: Network, Web & Security GJCST-E Volume 13 (GJCST Volume 13 Issue E7): .

Download Citation

Article content is being processed or not available yet.

Issue Cover
GJCST Volume 13 Issue E7
Pg. 15- 20
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjcst

Print ISSN 0975-4350

e-ISSN 0975-4172

Classification
Not Found
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

June 3, 2013

Language

English

Experiance in AR

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Read in 3D

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 9243
Total Downloads: 2396
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research

Article in Review

Intrusion detection in Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) is of practical interest in many applications such as detecting an intruder in a combat zone. The intrusion detection is defined as machinery for a WSN to detect the subsistence of unfortunate, incorrect, or anomalous moving attackers. For this purpose, it is a fundamental issue to differentiate the WSN parameters such as node density and sensing range in terms of a desirable detection probability. In this paper, we consider this issue according to two WSN models: homogeneous and heterogeneous WSN. Furthermore, we derive the detection possibility by considering two sensing models: single-singing detection and multiple-sensing detection. In addition, we converse the network connectivity and broadcast reach ability, which are necessary conditions to make certain the corresponding detection probability in a WSN. Our simulation results validate the analytical values for both homogeneous and heterogeneous WSNs.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]
×

This Page is Under Development

We are currently updating this article page for a better experience.

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Intrusion Detection in Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN)

Srinivasaraju Dantuluri
Srinivasaraju Dantuluri Grandhi Varalakshmi Venkatrao Institute of Technology, affiliated to JNTUK
P Poturaju
P Poturaju

Research Journals