Land use/cover classification- An introduction review and comparison

Land use/cover classification- An introduction review and comparison

Dr. Swapan Kumar Deb

Contact

Rajiv Kumar Nathr

Contact

Indian Institute of Technology Delhi

Land use/cover classification- An introduction review and comparison

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

LB015

Land use/cover classification- An introduction review and comparison Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

Accurate and reliable information about land use and land cover is essential for change detection and monitoring of the specified area. It is also useful in the updating the geographical information about the area. Over the past decade, a significant amount of research has been conducted concerning the application of different classifier and image fusion technique in this area. In this paper, introductions to the land use and land cover classification techniques are given and the results from a number of different techniques are compared. It has been found that, in general fusion technique perform better than either conventional classifier or supervised/unsupervised classification.

References

43 Cites in Article

Reference Format

Cec (1994). CORINE land cover; Technical guide, Luxembourg.
B Dousset,F Gourmelon (2003). Satellite multi-sensor data analysis of urban surface temperatures and landcover.
Dinh Nguyen,Duong (2004). Improvement of Land Cover / Land Use Classification by Combination of Optical and Microwave Remote Sensing Data.
S Amjed,C Almas,M Rahim,Tayyab Butt,Shah (2005). METROPOLITAN GROWTH MONITORING AND LANDUSE CLASSIFICATION USING GEOSPATIAL TECHNIQUES.
Xue Liu,Menas Kafatos,Richard Gomez (2004). Combining MISR, ETM+ and SAR data to improve land cover and land use classification for carbon cycle research.
Inge Sandholt (2001). The combination of polarimetric SAR with satellite SAR and optical data for classification of agricultural land.
Alaaddin Yüksel,Abdullah Akay,Recep Gundogan (2008). Using ASTER Imagery in Land Use/cover Classification of Eastern Mediterranean Landscapes According to CORINE Land Cover Project.
M Othman,J Legarsky,C Davis (2002). Microwave and Optical Remote Sensing Study of Boone County, Missouri.
Barry Haack,Matthew Bechdol (2006). integrating multisensor data and RADAR texture measures for land cover mapping.
F Vescovi,M Gomarasca (1999). INTEGRATION OF OPTICAL AND MICROWAVE REMOTE SENSING DATA FOR AGRICULTURAL LAND USE CLASSIFICATION.
K S Ranjan,Ryosuke Shibasaki (2001). A GIS based Integrated Land Use/Cover Change model to Study Proceeding of 22 nd Asian Conference on Remote Sensing.
G Macelloni,S Paloscia,P Pampaloni,E Santi (2003). Global Scale Monitoring of Soil and Vegetation Using Active and Passive Sensors.
J Lee,M Grunes,Eric Pottier (2001). Quantitative Comparison of Classification Capability: Fully Polarimetric Versus Dual and Single-Polarization SAR.
F Dell'acqua,P Gamba (2003). Texture-based characterization of urban environments on satellite SAR images.
G Franceschetti,A Iodice,D Riccio (2002). A canonical problem in electromagnetic backscattering from buildings.
F Tupin,B Houshmand,M Dactu (2002). Road Detection in Dense Urban Areas Using SAR Imagery and the Usefulness of Multiple Views.
P Frison,E Mougin,L Jarlan,M Karam,P Hiernaux (2000). Comparison of ERS Wind-Scatterometer and SSM/I Data for Sahelian Vegetation Monitoring.
Marcelino Pereira,S Silva,Gilberto Câmara,Ricardo Cartaxo,M Souza,Dalton Valeriano,Maria Isabel,S Escada (2005). Mining Patterns of Change in Remote Sensing Image Databases.
Chada Narongrit,Mitsuharu Tokunaga,Shunji Murai,Kaew Nualchawee (2000). Additional Nighttime Avhrr Data for Classifying Land Cover Types in Thailand.
Swagata Choudhury,S K Saha (2003). Cropping Pattern Change Analysis And Optimal Landuse Planning By Integrated Use Of Satellite Remote Sensing And GIS -A Case Study Of Barwala C.D. Block.
Maik Netzband,Elizabeth Wentz,Atiqur Rahman (2003). URBAN LAND COVER AND SPATIAL VARIATION OBSERVATION USING SATELLITE IMAGE DATA -THE URBAN ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROJECT.
W Stefanov,M Netzband Characterization and monitoring of urban/peri-urban ecological function and landscape structure using satellite data.
Edwin Martínez,Martínez (2004). REMOTE SENSING TECHNIQUES FOR LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF RIO JAUCA WATERSHED USING IKONOS IMAGES.
M Jelili,A Adedibu (2006). Land Use Classification and Informal Sector Question in Ogbomoso.
Kathleen Bergen,Daniel Brown,James Rutherford,Eric Gustafson (2002). Development of a Method for Remote Sensing of Land-Cover Change 1980-2000 in the USFS North Central Region Using Heterogeneous USGS LUDA and NOAA AVHRR 1 km Data.
Zhang Qiaoping,Isabelle Couloigner (2004). Automatic road change detection and GIS updating from high spatial remotely-sensed imagery.
Alessandra Chiuderi Multisource and Multitemporall Data in Land Cover Classification Tasks: the Advantage Offered by Neural Networks.
Standardization (2007). Unknown Title.
Luciano Vieira Dutra,Corina Da,Costa Freitas,Graziela Balda Scofield,José Cláudio Mura,Sumaia Resegue,Aboud Neta,Rogério Galante Negri,João Roberto Dos Santos,Marcos Elmiro,Sydney Sant,' Anna (2008). ASSESSMENT ON THE IMPROVEMENT OF THE LAND USE/LAND COVER CLASSIFICATION IN AMAZON USING ALOS PALSAR POLARIMETRIC DATA.
J Rogan,J Franklin,D Roberts (2002). A comparison of methods for monitoring multitemporal vegetation change using Thematic Mapper imagery.
Kume Takashi,Torii Kiyoshi,Mitsuno Toru (2000). Approach to Land-use Analysis in Hetao Irrigation Project of Inner Mongolia, China, Based on Satellite Image Data.
Al-Bilbisi Hussam,Ryutaro Tateishi (2002). A study on land use/cover classification with textural analysis using Multi-Temporal JERS-1 (SAR) Lband in arid and semi-arid areas.(A case study in Northeastren Jordan).
Jan Clevers,Harm Bartholomeus,Sander Mücher,Allard De,Wit (2004). LAND COVER CLASSIFICATION WITH THE MEDIUM RESOLUTION IMAGING SPECTROMETER (MERIS).
Ken Yoong,Lee,Soo Chin,Liew,Leong Keong,Kwoh (2002). Land cover classification and interpretation of NASA / JPL AIRSAR data based on scattering mechanisms and statistical distribution.
Sushmita Saha,Keith Richards (2001). Land Use and Land Cover Change: A Spatio-Temporal Study of The Alaknanda Valley, Garhwal Himalayas, India.
Tuhin Gosh,Gupinath Bhandari,Sugata Hazra (2001). Assessment of Landuse/landcover dynamics and Shoreline changes of Sagar Island through Remote Sensing.
R Lunetta,J Ediriwickrema,D Johnson,J Lyon,A Mckerrow (2002). Impacts of vegetation dynamics on the identification of land-cover change in a biologically complex community in North Carolina, USA.
P Rogerson (2002). Change detection thresholds for remotely sensed images.
J Lee,M Grunes,Eric Pottier (2001). Quantitative Comparison of Classification Capability: Fully Polarimetric Versus Dual and Single-Polarization SAR.
J Fiore,N Grody (1992). Classification of Snow Cover and Precipitation Using SSM/I Measurements: Case Studies.
S Aggarwal,Wrd Land use land cover change and its impact on soil erosion.
Liu Tian Guangjin,Zhang Jiyuan,Zengxiang (2001). Dynamic change of land use structure in Haikou by remote sensing.
Janne Heiskanen (2008). Remote sensing of boreal land cover: estimation of forest attributes and extent.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Dr. Swapan Kumar Deb. 2012. \u201cLand use/cover classification- An introduction review and comparison\u201d. Global Journal of Research in Engineering - E: Civil & Structural GJRE-E Volume 12 (GJRE Volume 12 Issue E1): .

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

Download Article

GJRE Volume 12 Issue E1
Pg. 5- 16

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjre

Print ISSN 0975-5861

e-ISSN 2249-4596

Keywords

Fusion Land Land Cover Multiresolution supervised unsupervised

Submission ReceivedJune 15, 2012
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted July 3, 2012
Published July 15, 2012

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

January 16, 2012

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 107

Country: India

Subject: Global Journal of Research in Engineering - E: Civil & Structural

Authors: Dr. Swapan Kumar Deb, Rajiv Kumar Nathr (PhD/Dr. count: 1)

View Count (all-time): 212

Total Views (Real + Logic): 5616

Total Downloads (simulated): 2892

Publish Date: 2012 01, Mon

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 50 views
Month 2: 48 views
Month 3: 54 views
Month 4: 39 views
Month 5: 30 views
Month 6: 30 views
Month 7: 29 views
Month 8: 47 views
Month 9: 53 views
Month 10: 55 views
Month 11: 50 views
Month 12: 21 views
Month 13: 30 views
Month 14: 21 views
Month 15: 20 views
Month 16: 45 views
Month 17: 19 views
Month 18: 34 views
Month 19: 25 views
Month 20: 43 views
Month 21: 30 views
Month 22: 10 views
Month 23: 23 views
Month 24: 19 views
Month 25: 35 views
Month 26: 34 views
Month 27: 17 views
Month 28: 21 views
Month 29: 31 views
Month 30: 28 views
Month 31: 16 views
Month 32: 35 views
Month 33: 40 views
Month 34: 22 views
Month 35: 37 views
Month 36: 36 views
Month 37: 36 views
Month 38: 27 views
Month 39: 39 views
Month 40: 30 views
Month 41: 26 views
Month 42: 42 views
Month 43: 27 views
Month 44: 15 views
Month 45: 45 views
Month 46: 24 views
Month 47: 39 views
Month 48: 38 views
Month 49: 48 views
Month 50: 40 views
Month 51: 32 views
Month 52: 40 views
Month 53: 29 views
Month 54: 20 views
Month 55: 32 views
Month 56: 37 views
Month 57: 37 views
Month 58: 32 views
Month 59: 14 views
Month 60: 12 views
Month 61: 41 views
Month 62: 37 views
Month 63: 25 views
Month 64: 44 views
Month 65: 15 views
Month 66: 49 views
Month 67: 21 views
Month 68: 26 views
Month 69: 24 views
Month 70: 13 views
Month 71: 50 views
Month 72: 39 views
Month 73: 26 views
Month 74: 23 views
Month 75: 23 views
Month 76: 44 views
Month 77: 37 views
Month 78: 34 views
Month 79: 33 views
Month 80: 26 views
Month 81: 36 views
Month 82: 23 views
Month 83: 33 views
Month 84: 26 views
Month 85: 17 views
Month 86: 20 views
Month 87: 26 views
Month 88: 44 views
Month 89: 20 views
Month 90: 36 views
Month 91: 47 views
Month 92: 32 views
Month 93: 33 views
Month 94: 34 views
Month 95: 29 views
Month 96: 43 views
Month 97: 40 views
Month 98: 17 views
Month 99: 29 views
Month 100: 31 views
Month 101: 25 views
Month 102: 39 views
Month 103: 41 views
Month 104: 42 views
Month 105: 40 views
Month 106: 30 views
Month 107: 42 views
Month 108: 48 views
Month 109: 28 views
Month 110: 36 views
Month 111: 29 views
Month 112: 26 views
Month 113: 21 views
Month 114: 38 views
Month 115: 26 views
Month 116: 26 views
Month 117: 27 views
Month 118: 42 views
Month 119: 36 views
Month 120: 42 views
Month 121: 11 views
Month 122: 30 views
Month 123: 14 views
Month 124: 24 views
Month 125: 41 views
Month 126: 36 views
Month 127: 33 views
Month 128: 31 views
Month 129: 31 views
Month 130: 31 views
Month 131: 29 views
Month 132: 33 views
Month 133: 36 views
Month 134: 24 views
Month 135: 32 views
Month 136: 25 views
Month 137: 30 views
Month 138: 14 views
Month 139: 22 views
Month 140: 36 views
Month 141: 17 views
Month 142: 13 views
Month 143: 32 views
Month 144: 37 views
Month 145: 29 views
Month 146: 43 views
Month 147: 36 views
Month 148: 32 views
Month 149: 18 views
Month 150: 45 views
Month 151: 20 views
Month 152: 23 views
Month 153: 34 views
Month 154: 27 views
Month 155: 16 views
Month 156: 37 views
Month 157: 47 views
Month 158: 38 views
Month 159: 30 views
Month 160: 38 views
Month 161: 25 views
Month 162: 22 views
Month 163: 40 views
Month 164: 48 views
Month 165: 17 views
Month 166: 24 views
Month 167: 37 views
Month 168: 32 views
Month 169: 37 views
Month 170: 41 views
Month 171: 33 views
Month 172: 58 views

Total Views: 5616

Total Downloads: 2892

2026 Trends

Published Article

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]