Loading menu…

Landscape of IP Ownership and Revenue Sharing Policies in India and their benchmarking with policies in the West

§ Asst.General Manager at BCIL

Send Message

To: Author

Landscape of IP Ownership and Revenue Sharing Policies in India and their benchmarking with policies in the West

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

6879P

Landscape of IP Ownership and Revenue Sharing Policies in India and their benchmarking with policies in the West Banner

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
Reading Preferences
Font Size
Line Spacing
Background
This converted HTML version may contain rendering inconsistencies. Please refer to the PDF for the authoritative version, or click here to provide feedback.

Abstract

Innovation is the key to sustainable ecosystem in Science and Technology (S&T). Robust Intellectual property (IP) policies and revenue sharing models to incentivise innovators are imperative to boost creativity and innovation by them. This paper assesses the current IP ownership and revenue sharing policies in India deployed by key autonomous public research institutes (PRIs) under Ministry of S&T (DBT, CSIR, ICMR, ICAR), Ministry of Defence (DRDO), and Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare (ICAR), Government of India (GOI) with 345 institutes under their purview and top 100 universities as per National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF)-2017 issued by GOI. Pertinent IP policy typologies studied included presence/absence of IP policies, IP ownership policies, type of revenue sharing models, benefit sharing policies, payout frequency, start-up policies etc. and its bench marking with successful models being followed by leading universities in west in USA, UK and Canada. The findings of this study will be of relevance to policy makers for understanding policy typology, to practitioners for drafting suitable policies and to innovators as key beneficiary of such policies.

References

36 Cites in Article
  1. 1. (2016). India. World Report 2016, 298-305.
  2. 2. WIPO: Intellectual Property Policies for Universities. WIPO: Intellectual Property Policies for Universities
  3. 3. (2014). Intellectual Property Rights for Software, Artificial Intelligence and Computer Related Inventions: A Comparative Analysis. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 29(1), 177-188.
  4. 4. (2006). Policies Resulting from the Commercialization of Technology: A Compilation/Comparison of Universities and Technological Institutions in Canada. By Miranda Schmidt Cooperative Education Student TRIUMF Technology
  5. 5. (2010). Intellectual Property Policies at Canadian Universities. Intellectual Property Policies at Canadian Universities
  6. 6. (2001). UNILATERAL REFUSALS TO LICENSE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND INTERNATIONAL COMPETITION POLICY. Competition and Trade Policies, 68-80.
  7. 7. (2005). Technology-Transfer: What India can learn from the United States. Journal of Intellectual property Rights, 10, 399-405.
  8. 8. Furqan Qamar (2017). Measuring Performance of Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) and the National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF). India Higher Education Report 2017: Teaching, Learning and Quality in Higher Education, 45-87.
  9. 9. (2019). Intellectual Property Rights (IPR). Intellectual Property Rights Policy: ICMR
  10. 10. Guidelines/Instructions for Technology Transfer and Intellectual Property Rights. Guidelines/Instructions for Technology Transfer and Intellectual Property Rights
  11. 11. Pradeep Yadav,Ankur Agarwal,Harendra Kumar,Shiva Kumar,Om Prakash,Basant Ballabh,Devakanta Singh (2025). Interspecific grafting compatibility studies between tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) grafted on eggplant (Solanum melongena) and its wild relatives. Vegetable Science, 52(01)
  12. 12. Dbt (2022). Doing the Unthinkable. Doing the Unthinkable, 105-112.
  13. 13. Intellectual Property Right Policy-2013. Intellectual Property Right Policy-2013
  14. 14. Cliff Reader (2006). AVS Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Policy. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 21(3), 306-309.
  15. 15. Dr. Sophia (2019). Predicting Equity VIX of Technological Companies. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE), 8(2), 252-257.
  16. 16. Intellectual Property Rights Policy. Intellectual Property Rights Policy
  17. 17. IP Ownership, Benefit Sharing and Incentive for Researchers-PPT WIPO. IP Ownership, Benefit Sharing and Incentive for Researchers-PPT WIPO
  18. 18. (2006). Survey Report on Royalty Rates and Policies Resulting from the Commercialization of Technology: A Compilation/Comparison of Universities and Technological Institutions in Canada. Survey Report on Royalty Rates and Policies Resulting from the Commercialization of Technology: A Compilation/Comparison of Universities and Technological Institutions in Canada
  19. 19. (2023). Conflicts Between Academic Inventors and Universities Since Bayh Dole Act. Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization
  20. 20. Mrinalini Kochupillai (2008). Engineering a More Innovative Environment in India: An Analysis of the Protection and Utilization of Public Funded Intellectual Property Bill. SSRN Electronic Journal
  21. 21. James Gazzard,Sarah Brown (2012). Revenue Sharing: An Assessment of Current Policies at UK Universities. Industry and Higher Education, 26(1), 21-29.
  22. 22. James Gazzard,Sarah Brown (2011). Unknown Title.
  23. 23. Saul Lach,Mark Schankerman (2004). Royalty Sharing and Technology Licensing in Universities. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2(2-3), 252-264.
  24. 24. Joseph Friedman,Jonathan Silberman (2003). University Technology Transfer: Do Incentives, Management, and Location Matter?. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(1), 17-30.
  25. 25. Joseph Friedman,Jonathan Silberman (2003). University Technology Transfer: Do Incentives, Management, and Location Matter?. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(1), 17-30.
  26. 26. Patents (1999). New York Times New York State Poll, March 1999. New York Times New York State Poll, March 1999
  27. 27. Recommendation of the Committee on Guidelines for distribution and utilization of royality received by the University for technologies developed by the University Teachers. Recommendation of the Committee on Guidelines for distribution and utilization of royality received by the University for technologies developed by the University Teachers, 15-17.
  28. 28. Intellectual Property Policy. Intellectual Property Policy
  29. 29. (2013). Supplemental Information 6: Data augmentation accuracy comparisons using ResNet50 on Oxford-IIIT Pet Dataset (for Table 6). All the information of Academic & Administration Rules and Regulations book
  30. 30. Jyoti Tripathi,Vipin Bhatnagar,Ashok Kumar,J Shahi (2015). Sensitivity Studies Using Globes. Journal of Nuclear Physics, Material Sciences, Radiation and Applications, 3(1), 75-86.
  31. 31. Intellectual Property. Intellectual Property
  32. 32. (2007). Copyright Page. Patent and Copyright Ownership Policy Statement, iv-iv.
  33. 33. (2019). Intellectual Property Rights (IPR). Intellectual Property Rights Policy of IIT
  34. 34. Amit Rehalia*,Samar Wazir,Md. Nafis (2020). Data Mining Association Rules using Probabilistic Functions without Predefined Weights. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 9(6), 486-494.
  35. 35. (2016). Intellectual Property Rights (IPR). Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Policy
  36. 36. (2012). Policy for Indian Institute of Technology Bombay. Policy for Indian Institute of Technology Bombay

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Suchita Markan. 2018. "Landscape of IP Ownership and Revenue Sharing Policies in India and their benchmarking with policies in the West". Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - I: Interdisciplinary GJSFR-I Volume 18 (GJSFR Volume 18 Issue I1).

More Citation Formats

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJSFR

Print ISSN 0975-5896

e-ISSN 2249-4626

Keywords
Classification
GJSFR-I Classification FOR Code: 050104
Version of record
v1.2

Issue date
June 30, 2018

Language
English
Order Article Reprint
Experience in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 1.2K
Total Downloads: 106
All Trends

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Landscape of IP Ownership and Revenue Sharing Policies in India and their benchmarking with policies in the West

Suchita Markan
Suchita Markan Asst.General Manager at BCIL