Liquidity Risk Management: A comparative study between Conventional and Islamic banks of Pakistan

Dr. Anjum Iqbal
Dr. Anjum Iqbal
COMSATS University Islamabad

Send Message

To: Author

Liquidity Risk Management: A comparative study between Conventional and Islamic banks of Pakistan

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

001BZ

Liquidity Risk Management: A comparative study between Conventional and Islamic banks of Pakistan Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
Font Type
Font Size
Font Size
Bedground

Abstract

The banking sector is viewed as an important source of financing for many businesses. In order to appraise and weigh up the soundness and reliability of banking industry, the information on the risk and how the fluctuations are managed are important to consider. Among the financial risks liquidity risk of the bank are crucial to consider. Appalling financial condition of the banks can lead to decreasing the value of bank. Managing the liquidity risk is required to be monitored and managed effectively and cautiously. Liquidity management is part of the larger risk management of the banking sector, whether they are conventional or Islamic. This study investigated the size of the bank, Non-performing loan ratio (NPL), return on assets (ROA), return on equity (ROE), capital adequacy ratio (CAR) with the liquidity risk of conventional and Islamic banks of Pakistan. The study is done on the secondary data for the period 2007-2010. The study found the significant and positive relation of CAR, ROA, ROE and size of the bank with the liquidity risk in both the models, whereas the negative and significant relation of NPL is observed in both the models.

References

26 Cites in Article
  1. A,V Ganga (2009). Principles for Sound Liquidity Risk Management and Supervision.
  2. D Abdullah (2010). Liquidity Management in Institudtions offering Islamic Financial Services.
  3. N Ahmed,M Akhtar,M Usamn (2011). Risk Management Practices and Islamic Banks: An Emprical Investigation from Pakistan.
  4. M Akhtar,K Ali,S Sadaqat (2011). Factors Influencing the Profitability of Islamic banks of Pakistan.
  5. M Akhtar,K Ali,S Sadaqat (2011). Liquidity risk Management: A comparitive study between Conventional and Islamic Banks of Pakistan.
  6. Farrukh Ijaz,Anum Akmal,Syeda Gillani (2011). The Determinants of the Pakistan Islamic Banking Industry Profitability: Panel Evidence.
  7. S Al Zarqa (2000). Definition of Gharar.
  8. S Ali (2004). Islamic modes of Finance and Associated liquidiy risk.
  9. Hussein Al-Tamimi,Adel Lafi,Md Uddin (2010). Bank Image in the UAE: Comparing Islamic and Conventional Banks.
  10. M Arab,E Anas (2008). Managing Risks and liquidity in an Interest free Banking framework: The case of Islamic Banks.
  11. A Awan (2009). Comparison of Islamic and conventional banking in Pakistan.
  12. V Dinger (2009). Do foreign-owned banks affect banking system liquidity risk.
  13. M Gamal (2000). Prohibition of Riba and Gharar.
  14. & Haron,Sudin (2004). Determinents of Islamic Bank Profitability.
  15. S Ika,N Abdullah (2011). A comparative study of Financial performance of Islamic banks and conventional banks in Indonesia.
  16. Franco Modigliani,Gerald Pogue (1974). An Introduction to Risk and Return: Concepts and Evidence, Part Two.
  17. M Islam,H Chowdhury (2007). The Management of Liquidity Risk in Islamic Banks: The case of Indonesia.
  18. D Kunt,Huizingha (1999). Determinents of Commercial Bank Interest Margins and Profitability.
  19. H Loghod (2006). Do Islamic banks perform Better than Conventional banks: Evudence from Gulf Council Countries.
  20. W Michael,Catanach (1997). A longitudinal disaggregation of operational risk under changing regulations: Evidence from savings and loan industry.
  21. F Modigliani,G Pogue (1974). An Introduction to risk and return: Concepts and Evidences.
  22. H Muhammad,M Tariq,A Tahir,W Momeneen (2009). Comparative Performance study of conventioanl and Islamic Banking in Pakistan.
  23. Khalid Hussain,Malik Muhammad (2011). Performance of Islamic and Conventional Banks: The Impact of Basel III.
  24. S Rosly,M Zaini (2008). Risk return analysis of Islamic Banks ' Investment deposits and Shareholders.
  25. Michiru Sawada (2010). Liquidity risk and bank portfolio management in a financial system without deposit insurance: Empirical evidence from prewar Japan.
  26. Yaqoobi (2007). Shariah Fianance-Questions and Answers.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Dr. Anjum Iqbal. 1970. \u201cLiquidity Risk Management: A comparative study between Conventional and Islamic banks of Pakistan\u201d. Global Journal of Management and Business Research - A: Administration & Management GJMBR-A Volume 12 (GJMBR Volume 12 Issue A5).

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJMBR

Print ISSN 0975-5853

e-ISSN 2249-4588

Version of record

v1.2

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 20631
Total Downloads: 10868
2026 Trends
Related Research
Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Liquidity Risk Management: A comparative study between Conventional and Islamic banks of Pakistan

Dr. Anjum Iqbal
Dr. Anjum Iqbal <p>COMSATS University Islamabad</p>

Research Journals