Local Democracy Revisited

1
Dr Hiltrud Nassmacher
Dr Hiltrud Nassmacher
1 University of Oldenburg

Send Message

To: Author

GJHSS Volume 13 Issue F3

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

ME5L3

Local Democracy Revisited Banner
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

The reform of institutional arrangements at the local level, especially the personalisation of executive power and the implementation of new options to participate, was expected to reinforce local democracy. However, there were doubts from the start as to whether this goal could be achieved, because institutional reforms were combined with the implementation of New Public Management. After more than a decade, an evaluation of the adopted measures in major western democracies seems appropriate. The comparative analysis draws on empirical studies conducted over three decades. Because of available data that is extremely difficult to compose for all western democracies, decision making procedures have been neglected in comparative empirical research. The evaluation presented here includes a puzzle of findings, which underpin future prospects of continuing reforms. The result is that a lack of accountability and control prevents democratization. Furthermore, measures taken to improve direct citizen participation have not achieved their goal.

62 Cites in Articles

References

  1. H Anheier (1997). Einführung.
  2. Helmut Anheier (1997). Der Dritte Sektor im internationalen Vergleich.
  3. Annette Zimmer,Eckhard Priller (2004). Der Dritte Sektor im internationalen Vergleich.
  4. B Barber (1984). Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics in a New Age.
  5. J Bogumil (2001). Modernisierunglokaler Politik.
  6. J Bogumil,L Holtkamp (2002). VII. Zusammenfassung: Das Zusammenspiel von Ehre und Polis.
  7. R Dahl (1961). Who Governs?.
  8. R Dalton,S Scarrow,B Cain (2003). New Forms of Democracy? Reform and Transformation of Democratic Institutions.
  9. T Ely,B Jacob (2013). Beating the clock: Strategic Management under the Threat of Direct Democracy.
  10. Matt Evans (2010). Electoral Reform and Political Pluralism in Local Government.
  11. R Frey,K.-H Nassmacher (1975). Parlamentarisierung der Kommunalpolitik.
  12. Chris Game,Steve Leach (1996). Political Parties and Local Democracy.
  13. Hans Geser (1999). The Local Party as an Object of Interdisciplinary Comparative Study.
  14. Élodie Guérin,Éric Kerrouche (2008). From Amateurs to Professionals: The Changing Face of Local Elected Representatives in Europe.
  15. F Hunter (1953). Community Power Structure.
  16. Peter John (2001). Local Governance in Western Europe.
  17. P John,M Saiz (1999). Local Parties in Comparative Perspective.
  18. P Kevenhörster (1979). Politik ohne Parteien?.
  19. (1996). Rethinking Local Democracy.
  20. Volker Kunz (2000). Parteien und kommunale Haushaltspolitik im Städtevergleich.
  21. Chris Game,Steve Leach (1996). Political Parties and Local Democracy.
  22. A Ladner (1991). Unknown Title.
  23. Andreas Ladner,Michael Brändle (1999). Does Direct Democracy Matter for Political Parties?.
  24. V Lowndes (2001). Trends in Public Participation: Part 2-Citizens Perspectives.
  25. M Margolis,D Resnick (1996). The State of the Parties 2018.
  26. J Masson (1985). Alberta's local Governments and their Politics.
  27. Mechthild Bereswill (2002). Homfeldt, Hans-Günther; Schrör, Wolfgang; Schweppe, Cornelia (Hg.) (2008): Soziale Arbeit und Transnationalität. Herausforderungen eines spannungsreichen Bezugs. Weinheim/München: Juventa.
  28. H Naßmacher (2001). Die Bedeutung der Kommu nen und der Kommunalpolitikfür den Aufstieg neuer Parteien.
  29. H Naßmacher (2006). Baustelle Stadt.
  30. Hiltrud Naßmacher,Karl-Heinz Naßmacher (2007). Kommunalpolitik in Deutschland.
  31. Salomon Orellana (2010). How Electoral Systems Can Influence Policy Innovation.
  32. O (2003). Power to the People. A pervasive web will increase demands for direct democracy.
  33. Anne Phillips (1996). Feminism and the Attractions of the Local.
  34. Theodore Poister,Gregory Streib (1994). Municipal Management Tools from 1976 to 1993: An Overview and Update.
  35. Theodore Poister,Gregory Streib (2005). Elements of Strategic Planning and Management in Municipal Government: Status after Two Decades.
  36. L Pratchett (1999). New Technologies and the Modernization of Local Government: An Analysis of Biases and Constraints.
  37. (1996). Local Democracy and Local Government.
  38. D Prior (1995). Citizenship. Rights Community and Participation.
  39. C Purcal (1993). Kommunalparteien-Eine Untersuchung von Struktur und Funktionen politischer Vereinigungen in der kanadischen Stadt Vancouver.
  40. R Putnam (2000). Bowling alone. The Collapse and Revival of American Community.
  41. U Rabe-Kleberg (1992). Vom Qualitäts- zum Risiko- und Patient*innensicherheitsmanagement – Erfahrungen aus dem Gesundheitswesen (Nils Löber).
  42. Alejandro Rodriguez,Alvin Brown (2012). Urban Governance Reform Index: An Alignment of Traditional Reform and Public Choice Propositions.
  43. Martin Saiz (1999). Do Political Parties Matter in U.S. Cities?.
  44. Martin Saiz,Hans Geser (1999). Local Parties in Political and Organizational Perspective.
  45. Susan Scarrow (1999). Democracy within - and without - Parties.
  46. Susan Scarrow (1999). Parties and the Expansion of Direct Democracy.
  47. K Schedler,I Proeller (2000). New Public Management.
  48. R Schmalz-Bruns (1995). Reflexive Demokratietheorie: die demokratische Transformation moderner Politik.
  49. P Seyd,P &whiteley (2002). New Labour's Grassroots.
  50. Theda Skocpol (2004). Voice and Inequality: The Transformation of American Civic Democracy.
  51. Kristof Steyvers,Tomas Bergström,Henry Bäck,Marcel Boogers,José Ruano De La Fuente,Linze Schaap (2008). From Princeps to President? Comparing Local Political Leadership Transformation.
  52. Sybille Stöbe-Blossey (2001). Verbände und Sozialpolitik: Das Beispiel der Jugendhilfe.
  53. G Stoker (1996). Introduction: Normative Theories of Local Government and Democracy.
  54. G Stoker (1991). Introduction: Trends in Western European Local Government.
  55. Signy Vabo (2000). New Organisational Solutions in Norwegian Local Councils: Leaving a Puzzling Role for Local Politicians?.
  56. Uwe Wagschal (1997). Direct Democracy and Public Policymaking.
  57. Susan Welch (1990). The Impact of At-Large Elections on the Representation of Blacks and Hispanics.
  58. Hellmut Wollmann (1998). “Echte Kommunalisierung” und Parlamentarisierung: Überfällige Reformen der kommunalen Politik- und Verwaltungswelt.
  59. Hellmut Wollmann (2008). Reforming Local Leadership and Local Democracy: The Cases of England, Sweden, Germany and France in Comparative Perspective.
  60. (2000). Engagierte Burgers haft, Traditional und Perspektiven.
  61. (2001). Verbände und Demokratie in Deutschland.
  62. J Zimmerman (1999). the New England Town Meeting. Democracy in Action.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

Dr Hiltrud Nassmacher. 2013. \u201cLocal Democracy Revisited\u201d. Global Journal of Human-Social Science - F: Political Science GJHSS-F Volume 13 (GJHSS Volume 13 Issue F3): .

Download Citation

Issue Cover
GJHSS Volume 13 Issue F3
Pg. 55- 65
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Keywords
Classification
Not Found
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

May 31, 2013

Language

English

Experiance in AR

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Read in 3D

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 4795
Total Downloads: 2554
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research

Published Article

The reform of institutional arrangements at the local level, especially the personalisation of executive power and the implementation of new options to participate, was expected to reinforce local democracy. However, there were doubts from the start as to whether this goal could be achieved, because institutional reforms were combined with the implementation of New Public Management. After more than a decade, an evaluation of the adopted measures in major western democracies seems appropriate. The comparative analysis draws on empirical studies conducted over three decades. Because of available data that is extremely difficult to compose for all western democracies, decision making procedures have been neglected in comparative empirical research. The evaluation presented here includes a puzzle of findings, which underpin future prospects of continuing reforms. The result is that a lack of accountability and control prevents democratization. Furthermore, measures taken to improve direct citizen participation have not achieved their goal.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]
×

This Page is Under Development

We are currently updating this article page for a better experience.

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Local Democracy Revisited

Dr Hiltrud Nassmacher
Dr Hiltrud Nassmacher University of Oldenburg

Research Journals