Local Lorentz Invariance and the Distortion of Einsteinas Equivalence Principle

α
c._y._lo
c._y._lo
σ
Dr. C. Y. Lo
Dr. C. Y. Lo

Send Message

To: Author

Local Lorentz Invariance and the Distortion of Einsteinas Equivalence Principle

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

SFRF4B52

Local Lorentz Invariance and the Distortion of Einsteinas Equivalence Principle Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Abstract

The local Lorentz symmetry says that the laws of physics are the same for all local inertial observers moving through space, regardless of their velocity and orientation. However, this notion of symmetry actually comes from the distortion of Einstein’s equivalence principle by the Wheeler School because they do not understand the essence of its physics and its mathematical foundation adequately. To clarify this, Einstein’s equivalence principle, quoted from Eins-tein, is compared with related theorems. A crucial point is that the Einstein-Minkowski condition is satisfied naturally as part of the physical process. It is pointed out also that Einstein’s equivalence principle is supported by experiments. It is shown: 1) based on general relativity, a violation of the local Lorentz invariance is generally expected; 2) the interpreta-tion of Misner, Thorne, & Wheeler, in fact, disagrees with Einstein’s equivalence principle; 3) mathematical analysis shows that their interpretation is a misleading distortion since it is valid only for the case of special relativity.

References

77 Cites in Article
  1. A Kostelecký,N Russell Unknown Title.
  2. Keng-Yeow Chung,Sheng-Wey Chiow,Sven Herrmann,Steven Chu,Holger Müller (2009). Atom interferometry tests of local Lorentz invariance in gravity and electrodynamics.
  3. V Kostelecký (2004). Gravity, Lorentz violation, and the standard model.
  4. C Misner,K Thorne,J Wheeler (1973). Gravitation.
  5. A Einstein (1916). The foundation of the general theory of relativity (translated from).
  6. A Einstein,H Lorentz,H Minkowski,H Weyl (1923). The Principle of Relativity.
  7. A Einstein (1954). The Meaning of Relativity.
  8. A Einstein (1911). Über den Einfluß der Schwerkraft auf die Ausbreitung des Lichtes.
  9. W Pauli (1971). Theory of Relativity.
  10. J Norton (1989). What was Einstein's Principle of Equivalence?.
  11. J Synge (1971). Relativity: The General Theory.
  12. A Gullstrand (1921). Unknown Title.
  13. A Gullstrand (1922). Unknown Title.
  14. C Lo (2010). Unknown Title.
  15. C Lo (2012). Unknown Title.
  16. C Lo (1995). Unknown Title.
  17. S Editor Chandrasekhar suggests and approves the Appendix.
  18. D Christodoulou,S Klainerman (1993). Unknown Title.
  19. Perlick Volker (1996). Für Ihre Dokumentation von Nr. 5/96 Biologie in unserer Zeit.
  20. C Lo (2000). The Question of Validity of the “Dynamic Solutions” Constructed by Christodoulou and Klainerman.
  21. Perlick Volker (2000). Unknown Title.
  22. C Lo (2011). On physical invalidity of the “cylindrical symmetric waves” of ‘t Hooft.
  23. R Wald (1984). General Relativity.
  24. C Lo (2000). Unknown Title.
  25. C Lo (2005). Misunderstandings Related to Einstein's Principle of Equivalence and Einstein's Theoretical Errors on Measurements..
  26. C Lo (2008). Bulletin of Pure and Applied Sciences- Physics.
  27. Roger Penrose (1964). A Remarkable Property of Plane Waves in General Relativity.
  28. H Bondi,F Pirani,I Robinson (1959). Unknown Title.
  29. C Lo (2010). Unknown Title.
  30. G Hooft Strange Misconceptions of General Relativity.
  31. A Whitehead (1962). The Principle of Relativity.
  32. C Lo (2003). On Criticisms of Einstein's Equivalence Principle.
  33. C Lo (2007). Unknown Title.
  34. C Lo (2002). Unknown Title.
  35. C Will (1981). Gravitational Radiation.
  36. C Will (1986). Was Einstein Right?.
  37. K Thorne (1994). Black Holes and Time Warps.
  38. V Fock (1964). PREFACE TO SECOND EDITION.
  39. Hans Ohanian,Remo Ruffini (1994). Gravitation and Spacetime.
  40. R Tolman (1987). Relativity, Thermodynamics, and Cosmology.
  41. J Hsu,L Hsu (1997). Blastogenesis of Human Lymphocytes by Endotoxin.
  42. L Landau,E Lifshitz (1962). Classical Theory of Fields.
  43. W Kundig (1963). Measurement of the Transverse Doppler Effect in an Accelerated System.
  44. (1993). The 1993 Press Release of the Nobel Prize Committee.
  45. M Tom,Apostol (1974). Mathematical Analysis.
  46. C Yang,R Mills (1954). Unknown Title.
  47. Ron Shaw (1955). Ron, Prof. David, Professor of Cellular Pathophysiology and Clinical Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, since 2009; Fellow, Churchill College, Cambridge, since 2011.
  48. Y Aharonov,D Bohm (1959). Significance of Electromagnetic Potentials in the Quantum Theory.
  49. S Weinberg (2000). The Quantum Theory of Fields.
  50. C Lo (2012). Unknown Title.
  51. Daniel Kulp (2012). Evans, Daniel Gwyn, (born 31 July 1973), Artistic Director, Chichester Festival Theatre, since 2016.
  52. Pei Zhou,Yuan (1983). Conferences and meetings.
  53. P Zhou (1987). Proc. of the International Symposium on Experimental Gravitational Physics.
  54. H Liu,P.-Y Zhou (1985). Unknown Title.
  55. C Lo (2006). The Gravitational “Plane Waves” of Liu & Zhou and the Nonexistence of Dynamic Solutions for Einstein’s Equation.
  56. C Lo (2003). Unknown Title.
  57. Yu Yun,Qiang (1997). An Introduction to General Relativity.
  58. C Lo (2012). Unknown Title.
  59. L Fang,R Ruffini (1981). The Basic Concepts of Relativistic Astrophysics.
  60. Liu Liao (1987). General Relativity.
  61. S Weinberg (1972). Gravitation and Cosmology.
  62. C Lo,Richard Hui (2006). Comments on the invalid proof of Einstein on L = mc<sup>2</sup> and E = mc<sup>2</sup>.
  63. C Lo (1997). Comments on Misunderstandings of Relativity and the Theoretical Interpretation of the Kreuzer Experiment.
  64. Richard Schoen,Shing-Tung Yau (1981). Proof of the positive mass theorem. II.
  65. E Witten (1981). A New Proof of the Positive Energy Theorem.
  66. J Kelley (1955). General Topology.
  67. G Hooft (1999). A Confrontation with Infinity.
  68. Frank Wilczek (2005). Nobel Lecture: Asymptotic freedom: From paradox to paradigm.
  69. C Lo (2011). Could Galileo be wrong?.
  70. Albert Einstein (1998). Einstein's Miraculous Year.
  71. C Lo (2011). On physical invalidity of the “cylindrical symmetric waves” of ‘t Hooft.
  72. Richard Feynman (1995). Feynman Lectures on Gravitation.
  73. Peng Huang-Wu (1999). Gravitational Effects in the Propagation and in the Emission of Light.
  74. E Ching,P Leung,W Suen,K Young (1995). Unknown Title.
  75. C Lo (1993). Mathews, Jeremy Fell, (born 14 Dec. 1941), Attorney General of Hong Kong, 1988–97.
  76. B Richter (2006). Charles Richter.
  77. Peng Huanwu,Xu Xiseng (1998). The Fundamentals of Theoretical Physics.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

c._y._lo. 2013. \u201cLocal Lorentz Invariance and the Distortion of Einsteinas Equivalence Principle\u201d. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - A: Physics & Space Science GJSFR-A Volume 12 (GJSFR Volume 12 Issue A8): .

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJSFR

Print ISSN 0975-5896

e-ISSN 2249-4626

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

January 10, 2013

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 5053
Total Downloads: 2561
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

The local Lorentz symmetry says that the laws of physics are the same for all local inertial observers moving through space, regardless of their velocity and orientation. However, this notion of symmetry actually comes from the distortion of Einstein’s equivalence principle by the Wheeler School because they do not understand the essence of its physics and its mathematical foundation adequately. To clarify this, Einstein’s equivalence principle, quoted from Eins-tein, is compared with related theorems. A crucial point is that the Einstein-Minkowski condition is satisfied naturally as part of the physical process. It is pointed out also that Einstein’s equivalence principle is supported by experiments. It is shown: 1) based on general relativity, a violation of the local Lorentz invariance is generally expected; 2) the interpreta-tion of Misner, Thorne, & Wheeler, in fact, disagrees with Einstein’s equivalence principle; 3) mathematical analysis shows that their interpretation is a misleading distortion since it is valid only for the case of special relativity.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Local Lorentz Invariance and the Distortion of Einsteinas Equivalence Principle

Dr. C. Y. Lo
Dr. C. Y. Lo

Research Journals