Maintaining the Medium of Instruction Policy in Malaysia: The Case for Bahasa Malaysia

α
Dr. Alis Puteh
Dr. Alis Puteh Ph.D. (Edu.Policy)
σ
Alis Puteh
Alis Puteh
α Northern University of Malaysia Northern University of Malaysia

Send Message

To: Author

Maintaining the Medium of Instruction Policy in Malaysia: The Case for Bahasa Malaysia

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

G5TL7

Maintaining the Medium of Instruction Policy in Malaysia: The Case for Bahasa Malaysia Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Abstract

This study examines the development and the implementation of the Malay medium of instruction policy in the Malaysian educational system and the relation of this policy to Fishman’s model and a multilingual society. The study uses interviews with persons directly involved in the process of education in Malaysia and examines a number of scholarly publications and other primary sources of information. Historical study is chosen as the research design. As a plural society, Malaysia considers nation building or national integration (Ibrahim, 1986) as being of the utmost importance. Fishman (1968) developed the concept of nationalist-nationist functions of language in nation building. Since independence, the Malaysian leadership has believed that education is critical for national integration. It is generally believed that schools inculcate children with values and knowledge that are supportive of a national ideology. The present study focuses on the process of developing and implementing the Malay medium of instruction policy in Malaysia. The performance of Malay-medium of instruction universities (National University of Malaysia, UTM and UPM) at the post-graduate level is impressive. These universities have proven their ability to get Master’s and Ph.D degree holders and medical specialists from overseas and local universities. There have been thousands of Malay-language theses in science from public universities after 1990, which indirectly shows that the Malay language can be used in education in a manner that is world class.

References

49 Cites in Article
  1. (1958). Year Implementation 1957 National Language is made a compulsory subject at all levels in all government-funded primary and secondary schools.
  2. H Alidou (2004). Medium of instruction in postcolonial Africa.
  3. P Alis (2004). Nationalism and Nationism: A Study of Language Medium Policy in Malaysia.
  4. P Altbach,G Kelly (1978). Education and Colonialism.
  5. E Annamalai (2004). Medium of power: The question of English in education in India.
  6. Rakesh Rethinasamy,Azmi Alias,Regunath Kandasamy,Azman Raffiq,Mun Looi,Tassha Hillda (2002). Deep Vein Thrombosis and the Neurosurgical Patient.
  7. M Bakri (2003). An Education System Worthy of Malaysia.
  8. S Barbour,C Carmichael (2000). Language and Nationalism in Europe.
  9. M Carnoy (2002). Latin America: the new dependency and educational reform.
  10. C Chai (1971). Planning Education for a Plural Society.
  11. Lau Su Kia,Su’ad Awab (1995). Kajian Perkataan Bahasa Cina Berkaitan dengan Pendidikan yang Digunakan di Malaysia Berdasarkan Korpus Berkomputer.
  12. H Crouch (1996). Government and Society in Malaysia.
  13. H Daun (2002). Education Restructuring in the Context of Globalisation and National Policy.
  14. S Davies,N Guppy (1997). Globalization and educational reform in Anglo-American democracies.
  15. C Enloe (1973). Ethnic Conflicts and Political Development.
  16. J Fishman (1968). Nationality -nationalism and nation -nationism.
  17. J Fishman,S Fishman (2000). Rethinking Language Defense.
  18. (1982). The Political Economy of Malaysia.
  19. S Gill (2004). Medium-of-Instruction Policy in Higher Education in Malaysia: Nationalism Versus Internationalization.
  20. M Halliday (1975). Learning How to Mean, Explorations in the Development of Language.
  21. A Hassan (2002). Dasar bahasa dan peranan negara di Malaysia.
  22. S Ibrahim (1986). Education and Politic in Malaysia.
  23. M Johari (1996). Towards Implementing the New Higher Education Legislation, Speech at Seminar on Management of Higher Education Institutions.
  24. A Ayob,H Mohammed,A Ahmad,M Saad,A Hussain (2001). Real-Time Monitoring of a Solar Charge Controller for Stand-Alone Photovoltaic Systems.
  25. Noorliza Karia,Mohamed Soliman (1999). Factors affecting enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems adoption among higher education institutions in Egypt.
  26. H Levin (1976). Educational Reform: Its Meaning, the Limits of Educational Reform.
  27. H Miller (1997). Language Policy and Identity: A Case of Catalonia.
  28. P Nababan (1981). Language perception and medium of instruction.
  29. R Najib (1996). Malaysia as a Regional Centre of Educational Excellence: The Challenge of Globalization.
  30. A Pennycook (2002). Language policy and docile bodies: Hong Kong and governmentality.
  31. R Phillipson (1992). Linguistic Imperialism.
  32. (2004). CBS News/New York Times Monthly Poll #3, November 2000.
  33. A Ranaweera (1976). Sri Lanka: Science teaching in the national languages.
  34. B Rustam (1996). Penamaan pangkat dan krisis budaya.
  35. D Snodgrass (1980). Inequality and Economic Development in Malaysia.
  36. T Skutnabb-Kangas (1999). Human rights and language wrongs a future for diversity.
  37. A Smith (1998). Nationalism and Modernism.
  38. Snutnabb-Kangas (2002). Linguistic Human Rights: Overcoming Linguistic Discrimination.
  39. M Sotomayer (1977). Language, culture and ethnicity in developing self-concept.
  40. J Spring (1998). The Sorting Machine Revisited: National Education Policy Since 1945.
  41. N Stromquist,K Monkman (2000). Globalization and Education.
  42. A Shamsul (2003). One State, a Few Nations and Many Languages: Language Identity, Formation and Nation Construction in Malaysia, paper presented at Solls.
  43. J Tollefson,A Tsui (2004). Medium of Instruction Policies: Which Agenda, Whose Agenda.
  44. M Tuqan (1975). Education, Society and Development in under Developed Countries in Changing Society, Centre for the Study of Education.
  45. Ukm (1989). The Process of National Integration in the Education Setting.
  46. M Water (1995). Globalization.
  47. N Wiersma (1995). Research Method in Education.
  48. R Wong,W Ho (2000). Malaysia.
  49. Wah Ho,Ruth Kam,Wong Unknown Title.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Dr. Alis Puteh. 2013. \u201cMaintaining the Medium of Instruction Policy in Malaysia: The Case for Bahasa Malaysia\u201d. Global Journal of Human-Social Science - G: Linguistics & Education GJHSS-G Volume 13 (GJHSS Volume 13 Issue G11): .

Download Citation

Issue Cover
GJHSS Volume 13 Issue G11
Pg. 15- 27
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

September 5, 2013

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 4927
Total Downloads: 2426
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

This study examines the development and the implementation of the Malay medium of instruction policy in the Malaysian educational system and the relation of this policy to Fishman’s model and a multilingual society. The study uses interviews with persons directly involved in the process of education in Malaysia and examines a number of scholarly publications and other primary sources of information. Historical study is chosen as the research design. As a plural society, Malaysia considers nation building or national integration (Ibrahim, 1986) as being of the utmost importance. Fishman (1968) developed the concept of nationalist-nationist functions of language in nation building. Since independence, the Malaysian leadership has believed that education is critical for national integration. It is generally believed that schools inculcate children with values and knowledge that are supportive of a national ideology. The present study focuses on the process of developing and implementing the Malay medium of instruction policy in Malaysia. The performance of Malay-medium of instruction universities (National University of Malaysia, UTM and UPM) at the post-graduate level is impressive. These universities have proven their ability to get Master’s and Ph.D degree holders and medical specialists from overseas and local universities. There have been thousands of Malay-language theses in science from public universities after 1990, which indirectly shows that the Malay language can be used in education in a manner that is world class.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Maintaining the Medium of Instruction Policy in Malaysia: The Case for Bahasa Malaysia

Alis Puteh
Alis Puteh

Research Journals