Management Effectiveness Evaluated by the Achievement of Goals Established in the Reward System and its Connection with Psychological Empowerment

1
Sabrina Nascimento
Sabrina Nascimento
2
Daniel Penz
Daniel Penz
3
Bianca Costa Amorim
Bianca Costa Amorim
4
Ilse Maria Beuren
Ilse Maria Beuren
1 Universidade Regional de Blumenau, Brazil

Send Message

To: Author

GJMBR Volume 14 Issue A6

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

5BL47

Management Effectiveness Evaluated by the Achievement of Goals Established in the Reward System and its Connection with Psychological Empowerment Banner
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

The study investigates the management effectiveness measured by the achievement of the goals established in the reward system for employees and its relation with psychological empowerment in a multinational company. Descriptive study with qualitative and quantitative approach was performed in an American company, based in Brazil. For data collection we used a questionnaire adapted from Spreitzer (1995). Data analysis used descriptive statistics, content analysis, and financial information published on the Stock Exchange of New York. The conclusion presents relation between management effectiveness measured by the achievement of goals established in the reward system and psychological empowerment.

21 Cites in Articles

References

  1. R Anthony,V Govindarajan (2002). Sistema de controle gerencial.
  2. A Bandura (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.
  3. K Blanchard,J Carlos,A Randolph (2001). Guia prático para elaboração de oficinas e formação de multiplicadores: valorização dos aspectos socioambientais da comunidade do Banhado.
  4. Jay Conger,Rabindra Kanungo (1988). The Empowerment Process: Integrating Theory and Practice.
  5. Zoe Dimitriades (2005). Employee empowerment in the Greek context.
  6. A Drake,J Wong,S Salter (2007). Empowerment, motivation, and performance: examining the impact of feedback and incentives on nonmanagement employees.
  7. S Finkler,D Ward (1999). Issues in cost accounting for health care organizations.
  8. Fábio Frezatti,Artur Nascimento,Emanuel Junqueira (2009). Desenvolvimento da pesquisa em Contabilidade Gerencial: as restrições da abordagem monoparadigmática de Zimmerman.
  9. R Griffin,G Moorhead (2006). Fundamentos do comportamento organizacional.
  10. E Lawler Iii (2003). Reward practices and performance management system effectiveness.
  11. G Martins,C Theóphilo (2007). Metodologia da investigação científica para ciências sociais aplicadas.
  12. A Nascimento,L Reginato (2009). Controladoria: um enfoque na eficácia organizacional.
  13. C Pereira (2001). Avaliação de resultados e desempenho.
  14. Ana De Sousa,Leila Visconte,Claudia Mansur,Cristina Furtado (1996). Silica Sol Obtained from Rice Husk Ash.
  15. Marc Siegall,Susan Gardner (2000). Contextual factors of psychological empowerment.
  16. G Spreitzer (2007). Taking stock: A review of more than twenty years of research on empowerment at work.
  17. G Spreitzer (1995). PSYCHOLOGICAL, EMPOWERMENT IN THE WORKPLACE: DIMENSIONS, MEASUREMENT AND VALIDATION..
  18. A Sterling,P Boxall (2013). Lean production, employee learning and workplace outcomes: a case analysis through the ability-motivation-opportunity framework.
  19. Kenneth Thomas,Betty Velthouse (1990). Cognitive Elements of Empowerment: An “Interpretive” Model of Intrinsic Task Motivation.
  20. M Zapelini (2008). Encontro de Administração Pública e Governança da ANPAD.
  21. R Yin (2003). Estudo de caso: planejamento e métodos.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

Sabrina Nascimento. 2014. \u201cManagement Effectiveness Evaluated by the Achievement of Goals Established in the Reward System and its Connection with Psychological Empowerment\u201d. Global Journal of Management and Business Research - A: Administration & Management GJMBR-A Volume 14 (GJMBR Volume 14 Issue A6): .

Download Citation

Issue Cover
GJMBR Volume 14 Issue A6
Pg. 19- 30
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJMBR

Print ISSN 0975-5853

e-ISSN 2249-4588

Classification
Not Found
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

September 13, 2014

Language

English

Experiance in AR

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Read in 3D

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 4523
Total Downloads: 2286
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research

Published Article

The study investigates the management effectiveness measured by the achievement of the goals established in the reward system for employees and its relation with psychological empowerment in a multinational company. Descriptive study with qualitative and quantitative approach was performed in an American company, based in Brazil. For data collection we used a questionnaire adapted from Spreitzer (1995). Data analysis used descriptive statistics, content analysis, and financial information published on the Stock Exchange of New York. The conclusion presents relation between management effectiveness measured by the achievement of goals established in the reward system and psychological empowerment.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]
×

This Page is Under Development

We are currently updating this article page for a better experience.

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Management Effectiveness Evaluated by the Achievement of Goals Established in the Reward System and its Connection with Psychological Empowerment

Sabrina Nascimento
Sabrina Nascimento Universidade Regional de Blumenau, Brazil
Daniel Penz
Daniel Penz
Bianca Costa Amorim
Bianca Costa Amorim
Ilse Maria Beuren
Ilse Maria Beuren

Research Journals