Menas Adamancy vs. Womenas Fidelity: An Anthropological Analysis of Menas Perception Regarding Womenas Empowerment in Pakhtun Society

α
Arab Naz
Arab Naz
σ
Waseem Khan
Waseem Khan
ρ
Umar Daraz
Umar Daraz
Ѡ
Mohammad Hussain
Mohammad Hussain
¥
Irum Mughal
Irum Mughal
§
Dr. Anwar Alam
Dr. Anwar Alam
α University of Malakand University of Malakand
σ University of Swabi

Send Message

To: Author

Menas Adamancy vs. Womenas Fidelity:  An Anthropological Analysis of Menas Perception Regarding Womenas Empowerment in Pakhtun Society

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

1F10C

Menas Adamancy vs. Womenas Fidelity:  An Anthropological Analysis of Menas Perception Regarding Womenas Empowerment in Pakhtun Society Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Abstract

The current study is an anthropological analysis of men’s perception towards women’s empowerment based on quantitative and qualitative approach. Chakdara town of District Dir (Lower), Khyber Pakhtunkhawa, Pakistan was ethnographically selected and a survey of 4564 households has been analyzed which was conducted during the PhD field study in 2008, where data was collected through semistructured interview schedule from a total of 100 respondents including religious scholars, educated males and females. Besides, the researchers have enumerated the issue under the extensive study pertaining relevant communal and global literature dealing with Pakhtun culture with a theoretical framework including Gender and Development Model and Women Empowerment Forum.

References

29 Cites in Article
  1. S Alinsky (1971). Rules for Radicals; A Practical Primer for Realistic Radicals (1st Ed).
  2. S Amin (1974). Accumulation on a world scale.
  3. A Bartlett (2008). No more adoption rates! Looking for empowerment in agricultural development programmes.
  4. E Boserup (1970). Women's role in economic development.
  5. I Chaudhiy,F Nosheen (2009). The Determinants of Women Empowerment in Southern Punjab (Pakistan): An Empirical Analysis.
  6. S Maqsood,A Sadaf,A Mazhar,A Arif (2012). A STUDY ON THE POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE IMPACTS OF ONLINE LEARNING AT THE GRADUATE LEVEL.
  7. L Fonjong (2001). Fostering women's participation in development through non-governmental efforts in Cameroon.
  8. Naila Kabeer (1999). Resources, Agency, Achievements: Reflections on the Measurement of Women's Empowerment.
  9. M Kongolo,O Bamgose (2002). Participation of Rural Women in Development: A Case Study of Tsheseng, Thintwa and Makhalaneng Villages, South Africa.
  10. W Khan (2011). Pakhtun Social Organization and Gendered Decision Making Process in Malakand Division; A Case Study of Batkhela.
  11. W Khan,A Naz (2012). The ignominy of evenness among Pakhtuns of Pakistan: Pakhtun social organization and gendered decision making process in Malakand division, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pakistan.
  12. A Frank (1967). Capitalism and underdevelopment in Latin America.
  13. S Goldberg (1974). The Inevitability of Patriarchy.
  14. M Haq (2000). Human Development Paradigm for South Asia.
  15. M Harris (1977). Why men dominate women.
  16. G Jiyane,B Mostert (2008). The Role of the public libraiy in economic empowerment and poverty alleviation among informal sector women entrepreneurs: A pre liminaiy study in the Umhlatuze Municipality.
  17. M Mathaulula (2008). Perceptions of men, women and community leaders on rural women empowerment in Makhado Municipality of Limpopo Province, South Africa.
  18. M Mead (1930). Sex and Temperament in the Three Primitive Societies New York.
  19. Cheryl Mcewan (2003). ‘Bringing government to the people’: women, local governance and community participation in South Africa.
  20. S Mosedale (2005). Assessing Women's Empowerment: Towards a conceptual Framework.
  21. Caroline Moser (1989). Gender Planning In The Third World.
  22. Sarah Mosedale (2005). Assessing women's empowerment: towards a conceptual framework.
  23. P Oakley (1991). The concept of participation in development.
  24. Ann Oberhauser,Amy Pratt (2004). Women's collective economic strategies and political transformation in rural South Africa.
  25. April Gordon (1989). BOOK REVIEW: Watson, Mary Ann, ed. MODERN KENYA: SOCIAL ISSUES AND PERSPECTIVES. Lanham, Maryland: University Press of America, 2000..
  26. Jane Parpart,M Connely,Patricia,V Barriteau,Eudine (2000). Theoretical Perspectives on Gender and Development.
  27. D Saiyid (2001). Women in Politics, Problems of Partcipation, A case study of Pakistan.
  28. (1994). Empowering girls and women to challenge harmful gender norms to improve menstrual health and hygiene, implemented as part of a WASH programme (UNICEF).
  29. (2005). Women empowerment: Measuring the Global Gender Gap.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Arab Naz. 2012. \u201cMenas Adamancy vs. Womenas Fidelity: An Anthropological Analysis of Menas Perception Regarding Womenas Empowerment in Pakhtun Society\u201d. Global Journal of Human-Social Science - C: Sociology & Culture GJHSS-C Volume 12 (GJHSS Volume 12 Issue C14): .

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

December 23, 2012

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 5018
Total Downloads: 2658
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

The current study is an anthropological analysis of men’s perception towards women’s empowerment based on quantitative and qualitative approach. Chakdara town of District Dir (Lower), Khyber Pakhtunkhawa, Pakistan was ethnographically selected and a survey of 4564 households has been analyzed which was conducted during the PhD field study in 2008, where data was collected through semistructured interview schedule from a total of 100 respondents including religious scholars, educated males and females. Besides, the researchers have enumerated the issue under the extensive study pertaining relevant communal and global literature dealing with Pakhtun culture with a theoretical framework including Gender and Development Model and Women Empowerment Forum.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Menas Adamancy vs. Womenas Fidelity: An Anthropological Analysis of Menas Perception Regarding Womenas Empowerment in Pakhtun Society

Dr. Arab Naz
Dr. Arab Naz University of Malakand
Waseem Khan
Waseem Khan University of Swabi
Umar Daraz
Umar Daraz
Mohammad Hussain
Mohammad Hussain
Irum Mughal
Irum Mughal
Dr. Anwar Alam
Dr. Anwar Alam

Research Journals