I. INTRODUCTION
Alarmingly high gender gap between males and females in labour force participation rate is one of the main serious concerns in India's socioeconomic development process. Causes and consequences of low female labour force participation rate have been analysed by researchers. Migration pattern influences labour force participation rate. Employment is one of the main reasons of migration. But, its dominance over other reasons of migration may vary among males and females. Further, freedom of mobility plays crucial role in socio-economic empowerment. Hence, understanding of females' migration pattern may provide a pivotal perspective to look into female labour force participation rate and socio-economic empowerment of females.
Government of India conducts census after every ten years. Census could not be conducted in 2021 due to the pandemic. 2011 Census data on migration is the last census data available at this time. However, National Statistical Office's survey on 'Migration in India', conducted during July 2020 – June 2021, as part of Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS) provides recent data on migration. of total migrants were females in India as per the 2011 Census. This figure includes all types of migration, i.e., inter and intra state, rural-rural, rural to urban, urban to urban and urban to rural migration. The share of female migrants is higher in rural India than all-India's figure. In rural India, of total rural migrants were females while of rural migrants in urban India were females. These figures clearly indicate that share of female migrants to total migrants is more than that of male migrants. But, females' migration is more in rural areas than that in urban areas. Causes and consequences of female migration need to be understood to assess socio-economic processes which affect women empowerment.
II. METHODOLOGY
The main data source is National Statistical Office report on 'Migration in India (July 2020 - June 2021) which was conducted as part of the Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS). 2011 Census data has also been used. Comparative analysis of male and female migration pattern has been done to understand gender gap in labour force participation rate and socioeconomic processes which cause gender gap. The main objective of the study is to get an overview of causes and consequences of female migration and assess its linkage to women empowerment and female labour force participation rate.
III. FEMALES MIGRATION IN RURAL AND URBAN AREAS, AND GENDER GAP
In all states of India, share of female migrants to total migrants who migrated from rural to rural areas is higher than share of female migrants who migrated from rural to urban areas. The gap is very high except north eastern states and Kerala. The high share of female migrants to total migrants gives an impression that more women migrate as compared to males. But, share of female migrants declines in the case of rural to urban migration. In two north Indian states, Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, share of male migrants to total migrants from rural to urban areas exceeds that of females. These two states are economically backwards and lack behind many states in social indicators. Clearly, development plays crucial role in female migration patterns. Generally, it is argued that rural to urban migration is a sign of socio-economic upward mobility, but rural to rural migration is just a displacement.
| Percentage of female migrants to total migrants from rural areas of states to urban areas of India | Percentage of female migrants to total migrants from rural areas of states to rural areas of India | |
| Jammu & Kashmir | 56.47 | 79.57 |
| Himachal Pradesh | 51.55 | 81.13 |
| Punjab | 60.62 | 78.79 |
| Chandigarh | 51.61 | 62.88 |
| Uttarakhand | 52.3 | 75.2 |
| Haryana | 57.96 | 87.04 |
| NCT of Delhi | 56.59 | 80.47 |
| Rajasthan | 54.44 | 84.56 |
| Uttar Pradesh | 48.58 | 89.1 |
| Bihar | 47 | 89.84 |
| Sikkim | 53.93 | 65.16 |
| Arunachal Pradesh | 51.39 | 56.51 |
| Nagaland | 50.9 | 51.78 |
| Manipur | 64.64 | 67.92 |
| Mizoram | 52.76 | 52.82 |
| Tripura | 64.78 | 77.47 |
| Meghalaya | 54.43 | 41.08 |
| Assam | 54.93 | 76.84 |
| West Bengal | 61.72 | 85.32 |
| Jharkhand | 55.14 | 86.94 |
| Odisha | 50.31 | 81.3 |
| Chhattisgarh | 57.67 | 79.34 |
| Madhya Pradesh | 54.7 | 80.51 |
| Gujarat | 53.58 | 76.88 |
| Daman & Diu | 43.92 | 64.83 |
| Dadra & Nagar Haveli | 42.71 | 70.32 |
| Maharashtra | 53 | 67.82 |
| Andhra Pradesh | 53.59 | 71.57 |
| Karnataka | 52.99 | 71.19 |
| Goa | 57.45 | 64.82 |
| Lakshadweep | 44.4 | 58.41 |
| Kerala | 63.04 | 63.5 |
| Tamil Nadu | 55.6 | 68.94 |
| Puducherry | 56.18 | 62.75 |
| Andaman & Nicobar Islands | 50.74 | 53.26 |
Delhi, capital of India, is one of the most preferred destinations for people from Bihar and Uttar Pradesh. Workers from these two states migrate to Delhi for employment opportunities. Since, it's a big city and India's capital, migration to Delhi provide both employment opportunities and socio-economic mobility. It's also a destination for students from these two states. It should be noted that number of male migrants exceeds number of female migrants. of total migrants from Bihar to Delhi were females. The figure is in Uttar Pradesh. In both states, share of female migrant to total migrants who migrated from rural areas to Delhi is less than that of share of female migrants who migrated from urban areas.
| Last residence | Last area | Percentage of female migrant to total migrants |
| Bihar | Total | 41.48 |
| Bihar | Rural | 40.82 |
| Bihar | Urban | 44.56 |
| Uttar Pradesh | Total | 49.21 |
| Uttar Pradesh | Rural | 47.34 |
| Uttar Pradesh | Urban | 53.95 |
IV. FEMALE MIGRATION PATTERN AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC EMPowerMENT
Reasons of migration play crucial role in socioeconomic development of migrants. Consequences of migration due to social institutions or processes are different from that of migration for employment and educational purposes. Marriage is the main reason of migration among female migrants. As per National Statistical Office's report on 'Migration in India, July 2020 – June 2021', of female migrants migrated due to marriage reason. Merely, of female migrants migrated due to employment and related issues. Employment is the main reason of male migration. of male migrants migrated due to employment related issues. Out of this, of male migrants migrated due to loss of employment opportunities. In rural areas, percentage of female migrants due to employment related issues is lower than that in urban areas. In rural areas, of female migrants migrated due to employment related issues. The corresponding figure is in urban areas.
In both rural and urban areas, migration rate among female is higher than male. But, the gap is more in the rural areas. In rural areas, migration rate among females was in 2020-21 while it's merely among males. In urban areas, migration rate among females and males are and respectively. In both rural and urban areas, Inter-state migration among females is low as compared to males. In rural areas, the gap is of 29.7 per cent points while it's 15 per cent points in urban areas. In terms of types of rural-urban migration, the share of rural to rural migration is highest among females while the share of rural to urban migration is highest among males . Clearly, female migration pattern is dominated by rural to rural and intra state migration.
V. CONCLUSION
If current female migration pattern continues to remain in future, it would be almost impossible to empower Indian females economically as female migration is driven mainly by social reason (marriage) while male migration is driven mainly by employment related reasons. Hence, possibility of empowerment due to migration is lower among females than males as rural to rural and short distance migration patterns are more prevalent among females. Government policies for female empowerment must adopt measures to facilitate female mobility for educational and employment opportunities.