Missing Elements of Computer Science Curricula 2013

1
Dr. Muhammad Anwar-ur-Rehman Pasha
Dr. Muhammad Anwar-ur-Rehman Pasha
2
Shaheen Pasha
Shaheen Pasha
1 Imperial College of Business Studies, Lahore, Pakistan.

Send Message

To: Author

GJCST Volume 12 Issue B11

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

CSTBJ77JK

Missing Elements of Computer Science Curricula 2013 Banner
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Rapidly expanding computing domain has forced educational institutions to up-grade existing curricula of computing degree programs. Recently, a joint task force of Association for Computing Machinery and IEEE-Computer Society has published the Strawman Draft of Computer Science Curricula 2013. The Draft has introduced some new ideas to keep computing curricula modern and relevant. The recommended curricula have designed in the light of 6% response rate of the conducted survey. This paper has pointed out some important aspects which need attention to meet the challenges of the 21st century. These aspects include an Ad-hoc approach towards the core body of knowledge, incomplete curriculum guidelines, over-ambitious contents and learning outcomes. Some other missing aspects include computing dispositions, global education, 21st century skills, guideline for inclusion and the hidden curriculum. It is believed the recommendations of this paper may generate some thought provoking ideas to make the computing curricula more robust and effective.

56 Cites in Articles

References

  1. (1965). An Undergraduate Program in Computer Science-Preliminary Recommendations.
  2. (1969). Curriculum 68: Curriculum Committee on CS Recommendations for Academic Programs in Computer Science.
  3. Richard Austing,Bruce Barnes,Delle. Bonnette,Gerald Engel,Gordon Stokes (1977). Curriculum recommendations for the undergraduate program in computer science.
  4. (1979). Curriculum 78: Recommendations for the Undergraduate Program in CS.
  5. (1991). Report of the joint ACM/IEEE-CS curriculum task force (panel session).
  6. (2001). Computing Curricula 2001: Recommendations of ACM & IEEE Curriculum Task Force on Computer Science.
  7. (2005). Computing Curricula 2005: The Overview Report.
  8. Eric Roberts,Russ Shackelford,Rich Leblanc,Peter Denning (2008). Curriculum 2001.
  9. (2012). Computer Science Curricula 2013: Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Computer Science.
  10. M Apple (2001). Educating the "Right" Way: Markets, Standards, God, and Inequality.
  11. S Arber (2001). Designing Samples.
  12. R Barnett,G Parry,K Coate (2001). Conceptualising Curriculum Change.
  13. B Bloom,R David (1959). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, by a committee of college and university examiners.
  14. David Bridges (2000). Back to the Future: The higher education curriculum in the 21st century.
  15. D Brunzel (2007). Universities sell their brands.
  16. Paul Chandler,John Sweller (1991). Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction.
  17. C Choo (2002). The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge.
  18. Peter Denning,Douglas Comer,David Gries,Michael Mulder,Allen Tucker,A Turner,Paul Young (1988). Computing as a discipline: preliminary report of the ACM task force on the core of computer science.
  19. Stephen Dicarlo (2009). Too much content, not enough thinking, and too little FUN!.
  20. P Drucker (2006). Classic Drucker: essential wisdom of Peter Drucker from the pages of Harvard Business Review.
  21. C Dweck (1991). Motivation examined. Levine, David (Ed.) Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1966. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1966, 109 p.,$5.95 (paper).
  22. S Garfinkel (2000). Biological Computing.
  23. G Gibbs (1981). Twenty terrible reasons for lecturing.
  24. A Giddens (1972). Emile Durkheim Selected Writings.
  25. (2012). 9. The Undergraduate Curriculum: Professional Education.
  26. G Engel (1976). A Comparison of the ACMIC3S and the IEEE/CSE Model Curriculum Subcommittee Recommendations.
  27. (1983). Model Program in Computer Science and Engineering, IEEE Computer Society Educational Activities Board/Model Program Committee Report.
  28. P Ironside (2004). Covering Content" and Teaching Thinking: Deconstructing the Additive Curriculum.
  29. N Jackson (2008). Tackling the Wicked Problem of Creativity in Higher Education.
  30. P Jackson (1968). Life in Classrooms.
  31. R Jones (2008). Student Engagement -Creating a Culture of Academic Achievement, International Center for Leadership in Education.
  32. R Karp (2011). Understanding Science through the Computational Lens.
  33. L Katz (1991). Light, N. Searle (Chairman). National Society for the Study of Education. Forty‐Sixth Yearbook, Part II. Early Childhood Education. Chicago: University of Chicasgo Press. 1947. $2.75.
  34. L Katz (1993). Dispositions as Educational Goals.
  35. L Katz (1995). Dispositions in early childhood education.
  36. P Knight (2002). Being a Teacher in Higher Education.
  37. Bruce Kogut,Udo Zander (1992). Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology.
  38. Alfie Kohn (1993). A7 Punished by Rewards.
  39. D Li,H Zhang (2009). Cloud Computing Beyond Turing Machine.
  40. G Li (2010). Information Science & Technology in China: A Roadmap to 2050.
  41. R Lockwood,J Hadd (2007). Building a Brand in Higher Education: Why Business Practice-Particularly Brand Strategies -are Becoming Essential in Today's Universities.
  42. S Lovely,S Smith (2004). Selective abandonment: How and when to say no.
  43. Eric Margolis (2001). The Hidden Curriculum in Higher Education.
  44. D Mundy (2002). A Question of Response Rate.
  45. I Nonaka,H Takeuchi (2002). The Knowledge-Creating Company.
  46. M Pasha,S Pasha (2012). Rethinking of Computing Curricula in Higher Education in Pakistan.
  47. M Pasha,S Pasha (2012). Essentials of Knowledge Management: Concepts, Theories and Practices.
  48. M Pasha,S Pasha (2012). A Pragmatic Approach for Implementing Knowledge Management in Pakistani Organizations Using Open Source Technologies.
  49. J Sitzia,N Wood (1998). Response Rate in Patient Satisfaction Research: An Analysis of 210 Published Studies.
  50. Martin Talbot (2004). Monkey see, monkey do: a critique of the competency model in graduate medical education.
  51. Paul Temple (2006). Branding higher education: illusion or reality?.
  52. (2012). A Complex formula: girls and women in science, technology, engineering and mathematics in Asia.
  53. A Utz (2006). Fostering Innovation for Productivity and Competitiveness.
  54. Jeannette Wing (2006). Computational thinking.
  55. J Wing (2008). Computational Thinking and Thinking about Computing.
  56. V Zítek,V Klímová (2011). Knowledge Economy and Knowledge Infrastructure.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

Dr. Muhammad Anwar-ur-Rehman Pasha. 2012. \u201cMissing Elements of Computer Science Curricula 2013\u201d. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology - B: Cloud & Distributed GJCST-B Volume 12 (GJCST Volume 12 Issue B11): .

Download Citation

Issue Cover
GJCST Volume 12 Issue B11
Pg. 9- 16
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjcst

Print ISSN 0975-4350

e-ISSN 0975-4172

Classification
Not Found
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

September 26, 2012

Language

English

Experiance in AR

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Read in 3D

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 10182
Total Downloads: 2702
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research

Published Article

Rapidly expanding computing domain has forced educational institutions to up-grade existing curricula of computing degree programs. Recently, a joint task force of Association for Computing Machinery and IEEE-Computer Society has published the Strawman Draft of Computer Science Curricula 2013. The Draft has introduced some new ideas to keep computing curricula modern and relevant. The recommended curricula have designed in the light of 6% response rate of the conducted survey. This paper has pointed out some important aspects which need attention to meet the challenges of the 21st century. These aspects include an Ad-hoc approach towards the core body of knowledge, incomplete curriculum guidelines, over-ambitious contents and learning outcomes. Some other missing aspects include computing dispositions, global education, 21st century skills, guideline for inclusion and the hidden curriculum. It is believed the recommendations of this paper may generate some thought provoking ideas to make the computing curricula more robust and effective.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]
×

This Page is Under Development

We are currently updating this article page for a better experience.

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Missing Elements of Computer Science Curricula 2013

Dr. Muhammad Anwar-ur-Rehman Pasha
Dr. Muhammad Anwar-ur-Rehman Pasha Imperial College of Business Studies, Lahore, Pakistan.
Shaheen Pasha
Shaheen Pasha

Research Journals