Mongolia: A Cultural Portrait Using the Hofstede 5-D Model

Mongolia: A Cultural Portrait Using the Hofstede 5-D Model

Dr. Charles A. Rarick Ph.D.

Contact

Charles Rarick

Contact

Gregory Winter

Contact

Casimir Barczyk

Contact

Mark Pruett

Contact

Inge Nickerson

Contact

Purdue University Northwest

Mongolia: A Cultural Portrait Using the Hofstede 5-D Model

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

HJ3NT

Mongolia: A Cultural Portrait Using the Hofstede 5-D Model Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

This paper explores the cultural values of Mongolia, a country rich in resources and recently classified as a Global Growth Generator (3G) country. The analysis provides better insight into Mongolian culture, a culture for which research data are sparse. The assessment was based on the Hofstede 5-D model of cultural values. The results of this study indicate that Mongolian culture is low in power distance, high in individualism, very high in masculinity, and high in uncertainty avoidance. It can be characterized as being short-term in its orientation towards time. This paper adds to the cross-cultural literature by examining a country that has not been previously studied. Implications of Mongolian cultural values for management practice are discussed.

References

28 Cites in Article

Reference Format

J Blodgett,A Bakir,G Rose (2008). A test of the validity of Hofstede's cultural framework.
W Buiter,E Rahbari (2009). Lessons for Global Business: What We Can Learn from the BRICS and Beyond.
J Colquitt,J Lepine,M Wesson (2013). Organizational behavior, Chapter 16.
T Craughwell (2010). The rise and fall of the second largest empire in history.
K Dartey-Baah (2013). The cultural approach to the management of the international human resource: An analysis of Hofstede's cultural dimensions.
R Dexter (2012). Dexter, Walter, (12 June 1876–12 Feb. 1958), artist, painter, and illustrator.
Tony Fang (2003). A Critique of Hofstede’s Fifth National Culture Dimension.
T Grenness (2012). Hofstede revisited: Is making the ecological fallacy when using Hofstede's instrument on individual behavior really unavoidable.
G Hofstede (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values.
Geert Hofstede (1980). Motivation, leadership, and organization: Do American theories apply abroad?.
Geert Hofstede (1983). The Cultural Relativity of Organizational Practices and Theories.
Geert Hofstede (1993). Cultural constraints in management theories.
Geert Hofstede (1994). Management Scientists Are Human.
G Hofstede (1997). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind.
G Hofstede (2001). Culture's consequences.
Geert Hofstede,Michael Bond (1988). The Confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth.
Geert Hofstede (2013). Replicating and Extending Cross-National Value Studies: Rewards and Pitfalls–An Example Middle East Studies.
B Kirkman,K Lowe,C Gibson (2006). A quarter century of "Culture's Consequences": A review of empirical research incorporates Hofstede's cultural values framework.
M Liotta (2013). How Mongolia is regaining the frontier crown.
Brendan Mcsweeney (2002). Hofstede’s Model of National Cultural Differences and their Consequences: A Triumph of Faith - a Failure of Analysis.
M Minkov,G Hofstede (2011). The evolution of Hofstede's doctrine.
C Rarick,G Winter,C Barczyk,E Merkt (2014). Iraqi and Kurdish Cultural Values in the Semi-Autonomous State of Kurdistan.
C Rarick,G Winter,G Falk,I Nickerson,C Barczyk (2013). Government and Business.
Jack Scarborough (1998). The Origins of Cultural Differences and Their Impact on Management.
K Sivakumar,Cheryl Nakata (2001). The Stampede Toward Hofstede's Framework: Avoiding the Sample Design Pit in Cross-Cultural Research.
Peter Smith (2002). Culture's consequences: Something old and something new.
Sunil Venaik,Paul Brewer (2013). Critical issues in the Hofstede and GLOBE national culture models.
S Venaik,Y Zhu,P Brewer (2013). Looking into the future: Hofstede long term orientation versus GLOBE future orientation.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Dr. Charles A. Rarick. 2014. \u201cMongolia: A Cultural Portrait Using the Hofstede 5-D Model\u201d. Global Journal of Management and Business Research - A: Administration & Management GJMBR-A Volume 14 (GJMBR Volume 14 Issue A9).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJMBR Volume 14 Issue A9

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJMBR

Print ISSN 0975-5853

e-ISSN 2249-4588

Keywords

Not Found

Submission ReceivedDecember 14, 2013
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 1, 2014
Published January 15, 2014

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

November 26, 2014

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 135

Country: United States

Subject: Global Journal of Management and Business Research - A: Administration & Management

Authors: Charles Rarick, Gregory Winter, Casimir Barczyk, Mark Pruett, Inge Nickerson (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 165

Total Views (Real + Logic): 4322

Total Downloads (simulated): 2216

Publish Date: 2014 11, Wed

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 30 views
Month 2: 37 views
Month 3: 27 views
Month 4: 31 views
Month 5: 26 views
Month 6: 51 views
Month 7: 48 views
Month 8: 37 views
Month 9: 42 views
Month 10: 43 views
Month 11: 45 views
Month 12: 33 views
Month 13: 28 views
Month 14: 33 views
Month 15: 25 views
Month 16: 15 views
Month 17: 41 views
Month 18: 42 views
Month 19: 10 views
Month 20: 40 views
Month 21: 32 views
Month 22: 27 views
Month 23: 15 views
Month 24: 18 views
Month 25: 32 views
Month 26: 38 views
Month 27: 17 views
Month 28: 32 views
Month 29: 34 views
Month 30: 36 views
Month 31: 45 views
Month 32: 42 views
Month 33: 20 views
Month 34: 14 views
Month 35: 24 views
Month 36: 32 views
Month 37: 20 views
Month 38: 32 views
Month 39: 17 views
Month 40: 41 views
Month 41: 41 views
Month 42: 36 views
Month 43: 27 views
Month 44: 27 views
Month 45: 40 views
Month 46: 26 views
Month 47: 15 views
Month 48: 32 views
Month 49: 38 views
Month 50: 40 views
Month 51: 29 views
Month 52: 29 views
Month 53: 24 views
Month 54: 17 views
Month 55: 34 views
Month 56: 27 views
Month 57: 35 views
Month 58: 28 views
Month 59: 24 views
Month 60: 22 views
Month 61: 31 views
Month 62: 19 views
Month 63: 34 views
Month 64: 16 views
Month 65: 30 views
Month 66: 35 views
Month 67: 44 views
Month 68: 36 views
Month 69: 25 views
Month 70: 35 views
Month 71: 29 views
Month 72: 26 views
Month 73: 30 views
Month 74: 35 views
Month 75: 35 views
Month 76: 36 views
Month 77: 32 views
Month 78: 40 views
Month 79: 37 views
Month 80: 29 views
Month 81: 23 views
Month 82: 33 views
Month 83: 20 views
Month 84: 39 views
Month 85: 32 views
Month 86: 21 views
Month 87: 26 views
Month 88: 48 views
Month 89: 42 views
Month 90: 27 views
Month 91: 28 views
Month 92: 34 views
Month 93: 17 views
Month 94: 45 views
Month 95: 29 views
Month 96: 28 views
Month 97: 42 views
Month 98: 28 views
Month 99: 14 views
Month 100: 37 views
Month 101: 24 views
Month 102: 24 views
Month 103: 44 views
Month 104: 39 views
Month 105: 33 views
Month 106: 24 views
Month 107: 33 views
Month 108: 27 views
Month 109: 34 views
Month 110: 26 views
Month 111: 29 views
Month 112: 11 views
Month 113: 23 views
Month 114: 33 views
Month 115: 27 views
Month 116: 20 views
Month 117: 31 views
Month 118: 29 views
Month 119: 42 views
Month 120: 31 views
Month 121: 43 views
Month 122: 29 views
Month 123: 34 views
Month 124: 33 views
Month 125: 34 views
Month 126: 26 views
Month 127: 19 views
Month 128: 23 views
Month 129: 43 views
Month 130: 25 views
Month 131: 18 views
Month 132: 27 views
Month 133: 11 views
Month 134: 38 views
Month 135: 28 views
Month 136: 37 views
Month 137: 37 views
Month 138: 30 views

Total Views: 4322

Total Downloads: 2216

2026 Trends

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]