Nanotechnology and Chitosan Nanoparticles in Veterinary Medicine

Send Message

To: Author

Nanotechnology and Chitosan Nanoparticles in Veterinary Medicine

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

PDDTM4IAVO

Nanotechnology and Chitosan Nanoparticles in Veterinary Medicine Banner

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
Reading Preferences
Font Size
Line Spacing
Background
This converted HTML version may contain rendering inconsistencies. Please refer to the PDF for the authoritative version, or click here to provide feedback.

Abstract

Nanotechnology is the new interesting field of science that enables us to use agents of extremely tiny sizes below 100 nm in novel applications. Although advent of nanotechnology in veterinary medicine isn’t similar as in human medical settings, but this field has been a recently attracted veterinary researcher. Here, we review the recent papers dealt with the uses of nanoparticles in variety of applications in particular chitosan nanoparticles.

I. INTRODUCTION

The skin is the largest organ in our body that provides a protective covering for the body besides its other physiological and defensive functions[1]. One of the most common skin pathologies is wound that defined as any break and disruption of the normal cellular and anatomical or functional continuity of the skin [2, 3]. Wound is a multifactorial disorder and it could be caused by physical, chemical, electrical or microbial causes[2]. Returning of skin to normal structure and replacement of destroyed or damaged tissue by newly produced tissue is called wound healing. Wound healing is a physiological and complex process established by four continues and overlapping phases (hemostasis; inflammation; proliferation, and tissue remodeling)[4, 5].

There are no lines of demarcation between the four previously mentioned stages that can be detected on the clinical or cellular level. The main goal of wound healing is to speed the recovery and restore the normal anatomical structure and function of the injured part with minimal scarring [6]. These steps involve multiple cellular and molecular events tightly controlled by numerous growthfactors, chemokines, and cytokines. In addition to the dynamic relationship between skin and microbiome (skin flora), that is another major contributor to the outcome of the wound healing process [7]. Signaling networks involving the interleukin (IL) family and growth factors are required to coordinate cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix (ECM) interactions, that are essential to fully wound healing [8,9].

The program of healing process can be interrupted by numerous factors which are classified into local factors (oxygenation, woundinfection, foreign body, venous sufficiency, wounded part, depth, local tension, and pressure) and systemic factors (age, gender, sex hormones, stress, ischemia, diseases, obesity, medications, alcoholism, smoking, immunocompromised conditions, and nutrition)[10, 11], Fig (1). Here in our paper, we highlight the variable applications of nanotechnology in veterinary medicine such as animal production, reproduction, diagnosis and treatment, nanovaccines, drug delivery, Nanosensors, and wound healing. Also, Chitosan nanoparticles were separately discussed.

Nanotechnology is a rapidly developing branch of science that studies the synthesis, structure, and dynamic of the atomic and molecular nanometer (maximum diameter of 100 nm) of nanoparticles [12]. Nanoparticles are synthesized by size reduction using either top-down methods such as milling, high-pressure homogenization and sonication or bottom-up processes such as reactive precipitation and solvent displacement [13]. The size and shape are key determinants to the biological efficiency of nanoparticles, by influencing active substance delivery (carrier circulation), penetrability (either directly through cell membranes or through phagocytosis), and cellular responses (receptor recognition) [14, 15]. The convergence of nanotechnology with medicine has been adding new hope in the therapeutic and pharmaceutical fields through a new discipline known as nanomedicine. This is the way for the development of novel materials and for the treatment of several pathologies [16].

a) Nanotechnology in Veterinary Medicine

Nanotechnology application in veterinary medicine is still relatively innovative. Recently, the nano-applications are already used in the veterinary medicine, animal health, production, breeding, reproduction, and nutrition [17], Fig(2).

1. Diagnosis and Treatment

In veterinary medicine, there is little definition of an animal's condition until clinical symptoms are detected. Infection can be substantially spread in the herd until disease is diagnosed. Nanotechnology may be effective method in critical clinical diagnoses because of this property[18].

Biochips can be used for diagnosis of animal diseases. A Biochip (or microarray) is a device typically made of hundreds or thousands of short artificial DNA strands that are accurately deposited on a silicon circuit. Biochips can also be used to trace the source of food and feeds to detect the presence of animal products from different species as a means to locate the source of pathogens a response to public health threats as avian flu and mad cow disease[19]. Using biochips, biological samples such as blood, tissue and semen can be instantaneously analysed and manipulated[20]. Nanoshells can be injected into the animal's to locate tumour cells. The nanoparticles release an attached drug at the tumor site to destroy the cancer cells. These nanoparticles are made from ironoxides [21].

Nanoparticles were used to target toxoplasmosis and human immunodeficiency (HIV) virus, Staphylococcus aureus, tuberculosis (TB), Brucellaabortus, anthrax, plasmodium vivax, plasmodium malariae, hepatitis B (HBV) virus, influenza virus [22-24], Listeria monocytogenes [25], SARS-CoV [26]. Also it has a role in reduction of aflatoxin as in use of nanosilver which used in treatment of experimental aflatoxicosis in broiler chickens. In other study revealed that supplement of nanosilver to diet containing aflatoxin could diminish the inhibitory effects of aflatoxin[27]. Also, gold nanoparticles and gold-based test strip have been used for the rapid detection of infectious bursal disease (IBD) virus antibodies in chickens[28], foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) virus [29], pathogenic bacteria [30], bluetongue virus [31], specific bacterial contaminants in chicken, such as S. typhimurium and S. enteritidis [32], antibacterial effect against Bacillus Calmette-GuΓ©rin (BCG) and Escherichia coli [33], haptoglobin in mastitic milk of bovine [34], diagnosis of viral infections in pigs [35], rapid detection of Mycoplasma suis in porcine plasma [36], and bacterial toxins [37]. Mastitis is common multifactorial disease that affects high-yielding animals primarily cows and is usually caused by Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, and E. coli, which leads to economic consequences for reducing the yield of milk [38, 39]. Zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO-NPs) have been found to be effective against bacterial biofilms inside the udder tissue such as S. aureus and E. coli [40, 41]. ZnO-NPs is more sensitive to detect cancer biomarkers and used in diagnostic and therapeutic purposes in common neoplastic conditions of animals such as lymphoma, cutaneous cancer, transmissible veneral tumor, and equine sarcoids [42-44].

In experimental studies applied by [45] on recent and infected wound in veterinary field by application of chemical and green synthesized ZnO NPs, they concluded that NPs having excellent antimicrobial healing effect with minimal scarring especially in green synthesized ZnO NPs. Also, Nanoparticles could be used in mass treatments of ectoparasites facilitating the drug-parasite interaction. Nanoparticles are used for improvement of the effectiveness of phytotherapeutic products such as theantiparasitic silver nanoparticles using Cissusquadrangularis against Hippoboscaaculata and Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus [46]. The nanoshells facilitate the target of the parasite improving the treatment of parasites and it can be useful in the study of host-parasite as biosensors. Nanodevices can allow the diagnostic of parasite in herds allowing veterinarians to suggest a correct health management [47].

2. Nanovaccines

Nanotechnology provides different forms of veterinary nanovaccines such as: recombinant Bacillus anthracis spore-based vaccine, influenza virus vaccine, Heliobacter pylori vaccine, Tetanus toxoid, Bordetella pertussis vaccine, Rota virus capsid vaccine and Bovine parainfluenza type 3 vaccine. The mucosal immunity is developed following intranasal administration of influenza virus vaccine and both IgG and IgA immune response are developed following the oral administration Bovine parainfluenza type 3 vaccine.

Also chitosan nanoparticles (CS NPs) were prepared with Leishmania superoxide dismutase and subcutaneously injected as recombinant Leishmania SOD vaccine. Also, intranasal (pneumococcal antigen A vaccine and Streptococci equi vaccine) or pulmonary (TB vaccine) vaccines were nano-based. Also, gold nanoparticle-based vaccine were developed against FMD, Newcastle disease, influenza virus, or herpes simplex virus 2, and also vaccines of African horse sickness virus (AHSV)[48-50].

3. Drug Delivery

The nanoparticles play an important role in drug delivery as they can carry drug and genes to the target site. The drug delivery systems have important effects on absorption, distribution, and excretion rate of drugs or other substances in the body [6]. Liquid vitamins that were prepared by nanotechnology are available for poultry feed and their nanosized are designed to pass through the gastrointestinal tract and deliver the vitamins or other nutrients directly in the bloodstream and therefore increase their bioavailability. NPs mask undesired tastes and improve the nutrient dispersibility and durability of the feed. In addition, they decrease the need to use preservatives [51]. In animals, smart drug delivery systems allow antibiotic use in amounts less than possible. Also, smart delivery systems can perform processes such as its ability to decide the regulation in the process of delivery of drug or its ability to make the drug addition according to the need, and the perception of chemicals in the site. Smart delivery system decreases the antibiotic usage and the treatment cost in farms [52].

4. Nanosensors

Nanosensors are miniature devices that can be used for diagnosis of biological material or tissue samples[53]. It has been used in several biomedical applications in veterinary medicine including animal health for diagnosis of some microbial pathogens-diseases [54, 55] and for animal production, especially the delivery of controlled quantities of drugs into breeding animal beverages. Nanosensors used for prevention of bovine tuberculosis [54] and early diagnosis of subclinical Ketosis (SCK) that is essential for management of dairy cattle health [56]. Detection of Mycobacterium bovis using nanosensors in infected cattle via breath allowed for real-time cattle monitoring [57]. In addition, the sensors can be used to measure body temperature, antibiotic detection, detect their sweat constituents, observation of behavior, movement, and stress via the implantation on animals [55].

5. Animal production and Food sector

By experimental studies applied by [58] on New Zealand White rabbits fed on nanoparticles; they showed increased weight gain at the fattening period. Similar beneficial production effects have been reported by [59] and [60] in chicken experiments. As the excellent results to an additive which improves the sanitary status of animals. So, the beneficial effect of nanoparticles used in animal production was most frequently observed in such parameters as weight gain, average daily gain, or improvement of the feed conversion rate (FCR) value [61]. As well, the nanomaterials that have been digested and shed in the feces can be used for fertilization in pastoral soil.

Nowadays, the nanomaterials are used for meat production as ingredients or additives in the food. They enhance the taste and reduce the use of fat, salt, sugar, and preservatives. Reducing the salt level is especially important and presents a great challenge for meat industry because in spite of advantages, use of salt consequently increased risk of cardiovascular disease since it is linked to hypertension [62].

6. Animal reproduction

Management of breeding is an expensive and time-consuming problem for dairy and swine farmers [19]. There are various applications of nanotechnology in the field of animal reproduction which optimize the general reproductive performance at its different stages starting from the diagnosis and treatment of reproductive disorders and detection of estrus till managing reproductive problems such as retained placenta [63]. Also, the NPs can also be used for sustained release of reproductive hormones [64].

Currently, Nanosensors also used to diagnose genital tract infectious diseases, metabolic and hormonal disorders, and even for the detection of estrus [65,66]. Similarly, a nanotube implanted under the skin, it is bind and detects the estradiol antibody at the time of oestrus by near infrared fluorescence and the change in level of estradiol in the blood can be measured [19].

b) Chitosan Nanoparticles (CS NPs)

Chitosan Nanoparticles (CS NPs) is an excellent example of nanomaterials which included in all stages of wound healing [67]. CS NPs showed an increased activity than its parent chitosan [68] due to its increased surface to volume ratio [69]. Chitosan is a natural and biodegradable polysaccharide composed of Ξ²1β†’4 linked N-acetylglucosamine and derived from the alkaline deacetylation of chitin which is the principal component of the cell walls of some fungi and the exoskeleton of insects, crustaceans [70,71], mollusks [72], yeast or green algae [73].

1. Synthesis

CS NPs consists of three functional groups, including an amino group and primary and secondary hydroxyl groups. CS NPs can be cross-linked with glutaraldehyde, glyoxal, and terephthaldehyde, producing hydrogels that can be used in different applications such as organ transplants, restoring organ function, gene delivery, and targeted therapy [74,75]. so, chitin and chitosan are manufactured commercially in large scale [76]. In its crystalline form, chitosan is normally insoluble in an aqueous solution above pH 7; however, in diluted acids (pH 6.0), the protonated free amino groups on glucosamine facilitate solubility of the molecule. Chitosan preparations of various molecular weights (50–2,000 kDa), degrees of deacetylation (30–95%), and further molecular derivatization patterns allow extensive adjustment of mechanical and biological properties [77].

CS NPs can be synthesized using either "bottom-up" or "top-down" approaches and/or a combination of both procedures [78]. CS NPs are synthesized through numerous "bottom-up" approaches such as polymerization of CS with methacrylic acid (PMAA) to make CH-PMAA NPs, or through a reverse micelle medium or microemulsion methods [79]. Top-down approaches such as milling, high-pressure homogenization, and ultra-sonication are also applied for the synthesis of these nanomaterials [80]. Many methods have been employed for the syntheses of CS NPs, but five methods are presently available. They are ionotropic gelation, microemulsion, emulsification solvent diffusion, polyelectrolyte complex, and reverse micellarmethod [81], Fig (3). Out of this, the most widely used methods are ionotropic gelation and polyelectrolyte complex. These methods are simple and do not apply high shear force or use organic solvents [82].

2. Biomedical applications

Chitosan nanoparticles have great commercial value due to its high nitrogen content and other physiochemical properties like biocompatibility, adsorptive ability[69], biodegradable[72], anticholesterolemic, fungistatic, noncarcinogenic, remarkable affinity to proteins, stimulation of healing, tissue engineering scaffolds, and drug delivery[83-85]. In addition to, hemostatic activity, anti-inflectional activity, property to accelerate wound healing[86], allergenicity, and bioactivity make it a very attractive substance for diverse applications as a biomaterial in the biomedical, food, and chemical industries[87, 88]. Other chitosan properties are low toxicity, availability, low cost, permeability to oxygen, and ease of chemical modification [70,89,90]. The biodegradation rate of chitosan samples is the highest at a temperature of 36∘C and is characterized by a relatively prolonged induction period, which is shorter at higher temperatures. The smaller the molecular weight of chitosan, the shorter the induction period[91].

3. Drug Delivery

Separated reports are available on the use of combinations of antibiotics and chitosan and its derivatives as antimicrobials. Decker et al. proposed a synergistic chlorhexidine/chitosan combination for improved anti-plaque strategies [92]. Tobramycin is one of the antibiotics which is reported to show synergistic action with chitosan in planktonic culture of Pseudomonas aeruginosa [93]. Bioadhesive and antimicrobial properties of chitosan and its derivatives are effective in antimicrobial drug delivery control, release of Chlorhexidine and Nystat in oral preparations [94,95], release of ampicillin [96], drug delivery system for Ofloxacin [97] in ophthalmic preparations, and gastrointestinal-release preparations for Tobramycin sulfate [98].

4. Antimicrobial and antifungal activities

CS NPs are present in many forms such as beads, powders, gels, sponges, tubes, fibers, and films [99βˆ’101], hydrogel [102], and biofilm [103]. These forms facilitate the antibacterial and wound-healing activity of CS NPS. Chitosan nanoparticles were shown to have significant bactericidal effects on different types of bacteria and no cytotoxic effect on mouse fibroblast cells [104]. Their antimicrobial effects against a broad range of gram positive and gram-negative bacteria as well as fungi were reported [105βˆ’107]. Archana, D., et al., reported in an experiment on a wound in rats the antimicrobial and wound-healing activity of chitosan [67]. Although several studies have shown that chitosan exhibited higher antibacterial activity against gram-positive bacteria than gram-negative bacteria, while some other studies have shown that gram-negative bacteria as more susceptible than gram-positive [108,109], many works have demonstrated that there is no significant difference between antibacterial activity and bacterial species [110].

Studies have reported the antibacterial activity of CHNP against Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus mutans,

Salmonellatyphimurium, Salmonellacholeraesuis, and Pseudomonasaeruginosa [107, 111]. Antifungal activity of CHNP has also been reported against Aspergillus niger, Fusariumsolani, Rhizoctoniasolani, Collectotrichum gloeosporioides, Candida albicans [68, 112]. Chitosan's antibacterial efficacy also depends on multiple, factors both intrinsic and extrinsic. Intrinsic parameters comprise the molecular weight and degree of deacetylation of parent chitosan, nanoparticle size, and concentration. The extrinsic factors involve pH, temperature, reactive time and so on [113].

The CS NPS size is an important factor which affects its antimicrobial activity, as the decrease in size at lower concentrations is due to decreased viscosity causing better solubility of chitosan in acetic acid solution and resulting in better action of chitosan [114].

However, deacetylation degree, positive charge content, and other factors including molecular weight can affect the antibacterial activities of chitosan [115], as the molecular weight has a stronger effect on the antimicrobial activity compared to the degree of acetylation [108,116,117]. It has been reported that decreasing the molecular weight of chitosan may increase its binding affinity to the membrane due to improved mobility, attraction, and ionic interaction [118], though a proper antibacterial activity can be obtained only when the molecular weight is larger than 10 kDa [119]. In acid, the antimicrobial activity was shown to increase with increasing molecular weight [116], while the antimicrobial activity changed at pH 7.0 [115].

The most prevalent proposed antibacterial activity of chitosan is by binding to the negatively charged bacterial cell wall causing disruption of the cell thus altering the membrane permeability [120,121], followed by attachment to DNA causing inhibition of DNA replication and subsequently cell death [121]. Another possible mechanism is that chitosan acts as a chelating agent that selectively binds to trace metal elements causing toxin production and inhibiting microbial growth [122]. For instance, chitosan composites have shown antiviral activity against H1N1 influenza A virus [123] and Human cytomegalovirus (HMCV) strain AD-169 [123,124].

5. Wound healing

The application of nanotechnology in the field of wound healing gave way to the manufacture and innovation of many bandages, which in turn speed up healing with the least possibility of scarring. [16]. From our point of view, the good selection of suitable nanomaterials for different wound types can play the main role in wound healing and tissue remodeling. The nanomaterials used in wound healing are classified into two categories: (1) nanomaterials that exhibit intrinsic properties beneficial for wound treatment and (2) nanomaterials included in drug delivery [125, 126]. An ideal material should be able to protect wounds against microbial interactions [127].

An experimental study performed by Chandika, P., et al [128] documented that chitosan increased wound healing rates in mice. N-acetyl glucosamine (NAG) present in chitin and chitosan is a major component of dermal tissue which is essential for repair of scar tissues [129]. Chitosan's positive surface charge enables it to effectively support cell growth [130] and promotes surface-induced thrombosis and blood coagulation. Free amino groups which are present on the chitosan membrane surface may form polyelectrolyte complexes with acidic groups of the cellular elements of blood [86]. Chitosan promotes the dermal regeneration during skin reconstruction by regulating the deposition and accelerating the arrangement of thin collagen fibers. It also modulates fibroblast activation, sustaining the regeneration of the extracellular matrix while stimulating cell proliferation and migration (i.e. the formation of granulation tissue) and enhancing wound healing [131].

Natural products-derived biomaterials can provide materials with greater complexity and composition, and in order to mimic the extracellular matrix (ECM) conditions of the wound and to provide a scaffold for the fibroblasts for collagen deposition, ECM-based therapies have gained popularity [132].

Studies suggest that chitin and chitosan promote the migration of polymorphonuclear and mononuclear cells and accelerate the reformation of connective tissue and angiogenesis (necessary for the arrival of repair cells such as fibroblast)[133]. In recent studies, chitosan has been used to deliver bioactive molecules, basic fibroblast growth factor[86] and human epidermal growth factor[134] were encapsulated in this biomaterial; electrospun nonwoven nanofibrous hybrid mats based on chitosan and poly[(L-lactide)-co-(D,L-lactide)] were produced; [135] chitosan dressing incorporating a procoagulant (polyphosphate) and an antimicrobial (silver); [85] and chitosan acetate bandages were used as a topical antimicrobial dressing for infected burns[83].

II. CONCLUSION

Nanotechnology is a rapidly developing branch of science that could be applied in various aspects with different actions. Although advent of nanotechnology in veterinary medicine isn't similar as in human medical settings, but this field has been recently attracted veterinary researchers. We conclude that the field of nanotechnology in veterinary medicine is a promising field in different disciplines; surgery, pharmacology, vaccinology... etc.

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest.

FIGURE LEGENDS:
Fig. (2): Showing applications of Nanotechnology in Veterinary Medicine. Fig. (3): Different methods of Chitosan nanoparticles synthesis.
Fig. (2): Showing applications of Nanotechnology in Veterinary Medicine. Fig. (3): Different methods of Chitosan nanoparticles synthesis.

References

125 Cites in Article
  1. 1. J Reinke,H Sorg (2012). Wound repair and regeneration. European surgical research. Europaische chirurgische Forschung. Recherches chirurgicales europeennes, 49(1), 35-43.
  2. 2. M Farahpour,M Habibi (2012). Evaluation of the wound healing activity of an ethanolic extract of Ceylon cinnamon in mice. VeterinΓ‘rnΓ­ medicΓ­na, 57(1), 53-57.
  3. 3. M Arun,S Satish,P Anima (2016). Evaluation of wound healing, antioxidant and antimicrobial efficacy of Jasminum auriculatum Vahl. leaves. Avicenna journal of phytomedicine, 6(3), 295-304.
  4. 4. P Martin (1997). Wound Healing--Aiming for Perfect Skin Regeneration. Science, 276, 75-81.
  5. 5. Geoffrey Gurtner,Sabine Werner,Yann Barrandon,Michael Longaker (2008). Wound repair and regeneration. Nature, 453(7193), 314-321.
  6. 6. D Archana,Brijesh Singh,Joydeep Dutta,P Dutta (2013). In vivo evaluation of chitosan–PVP–titanium dioxide nanocomposite as wound dressing material. Carbohydrate Polymers, 95(1), 530-539.
  7. 7. A Byrd,Y Belkaid,J Segre (2018). The human skin microbiome. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 16(3), 143.
  8. 8. Sabine Eming,Paul Martin,Marjana Tomic-Canic (2014). Wound repair and regeneration: Mechanisms, signaling, and translation. Science Translational Medicine, 6(265), 265-266.
  9. 9. I Pastar (2014). Epithelialization in Wound Healing: A Comprehensive Review. Advances in wound care, 3(7), 445-464.
  10. 10. Jodi Mcdaniel,Kristine Browning (2014). Smoking, Chronic Wound Healing, and Implications for Evidence-Based Practice. Journal of Wound, Ostomy & Continence Nursing, 41(5), 415-423.
  11. 11. S Guo,L Dipietro (2010). Factors Affecting Wound Healing. Journal of Dental Research, 89(3), 219-229.
  12. 12. Karolina Niska,Ewelina Zielinska,Marek Radomski,Iwona Inkielewicz-Stepniak (2017). Metal nanoparticles in dermatology and cosmetology: Interactions with human skin cells. Chemico-Biological Interactions, 295, 38-51.
  13. 13. D Koilparambil,J Shanavas (2017). Chitosan nanoparticles preparation and applications. Environmental Chemistry Letters
  14. 14. Ping-Chang Lin,Stephen Lin,Paul Wang,Rajagopalan Sridhar (2014). Techniques for physicochemical characterization of nanomaterials. Biotechnology Advances, 32(4), 711-726.
  15. 15. Saji George,Sijie Lin,Zhaoxia Ji,Courtney Thomas,Linjiang Li,Mathew Mecklenburg,Huan Meng,Xiang Wang,Haiyuan Zhang,Tian Xia,J Hohman,Shuo Lin,Jeffrey Zink,Paul Weiss,AndrΓ© Nel (2012). Surface Defects on Plate-Shaped Silver Nanoparticles Contribute to Its Hazard Potential in a Fish Gill Cell Line and Zebrafish Embryos. ACS Nano, 6(5), 3745-3759.
  16. 16. Maria Ojeda-Martínez,Irinea YÑñez-SÑnchez,Celso VelÑsquez-Ordoñez,Maria Martínez-Palomar,Adriana Álvarez-Rodríguez,Miguel Garcia-SÑnchez,Fernando Rojas-GonzÑlez,Francisco GÑlvez-Gastélum (2015). Skin wound healing with chitosan thin films containing supported silver nanospheres. Journal of Bioactive and Compatible Polymers, 30(6), 617-632.
  17. 17. Anju Manuja,Balvinder Kumar,Raj Singh (2012). Nanotechnology developments: opportunities for animal health and production. Nanotechnology Development, 2(1), 4.
  18. 18. K Jain (2005). Nanotechnology in clinical laboratory diagnostics. Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry, 358(1-2), 37-54.
  19. 19. S Patil,K Kore,P Kumar (2009). Nanotechnology and its applications in Veterinary and Animal Science. Nanotechnology and its applications in Veterinary and Animal Science, 2
  20. 20. L Hirsch (2003). Nanoshell-mediated near-infrared thermal therapy of tumors under magnetic resonance guidance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 13549-13554.
  21. 21. R Freitas (2005). Microbivores: Artificial Mechanical Phagocytes using Digest and Discharge Protocol. J. Evol. Technol, 14, 1-52.
  22. 22. Liam Powles,Sue Xiang,Cordelia Selomulya,Magdalena Plebanski (2015). The Use of Synthetic Carriers in Malaria Vaccine Design. Vaccines, 3(4), 894-929.
  23. 23. C Colonna,R Dorati,B Conti,P Caliceti,I Genta (2013). Sub-unit vaccine against S. aureus-mediated infections: Set-up of nano-sized polymeric adjuvant. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 452(1-2), 390-401.
  24. 24. Q Zhao (2014). PEGylated mesoporous silica as a redox-responsive drug delivery system for loading thiol-containing drugs. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 477(1), 613-622.
  25. 25. C Alvarez-Dominguez (2016). A goldglyconanoparticle carrying a listeriolysin O peptide and formulated with Advaxβ„’ delta inulin adjuvant induces robust T-cell protection against Listeria infection. A goldglyconanoparticle carrying a listeriolysin O peptide and formulated with Advaxβ„’ delta inulin adjuvant induces robust T-cell protection against Listeria infection
  26. 26. Y Honda-Okubo (2015). Severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus vaccines formulated with delta inulin adjuvants provide enhanced protection while ameliorating lung eosinophilic immunopathology. Journal of virology, 89(6), 2995-3007.
  27. 27. Majid Gholami-Ahangaran,Noosha Zia-Jahromi (2011). Nanosilver effects on growth parameters in experimental aflatoxicosis in broiler chickens. Toxicology and Industrial Health, 29(2), 121-125.
  28. 28. N Mat Isa (2011). Immunochromatographic Gold-Based Test Strip for Rapid Detection of Infectious Bursal Disease Virus Antibodies. Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation: official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, 23, 320-324.
  29. 29. Yao-Zhong Ding,Yong-Sheng Liu,Jian-Hua Zhou,Hao-Tai Chen,Gang Wei,Li-Na Ma,Jie Zhang (2011). A highly sensitive detection for foot-and-mouth disease virus by gold nanopariticle improved immuno-PCR. Virology Journal, 8(1), 148-148.
  30. 30. Cuong Cao,Lionel Gontard,Le Thuy Tram,Anders Wolff,Dang Bang (2011). Dual Enlargement of Gold Nanoparticles: From Mechanism to Scanometric Detection of Pathogenic Bacteria. Small, 7(12), 1701-1708.
  31. 31. Hui-Qiong Yin,Min-Xian Jia,Li-Jun Shi,Shu Yang,Li-Ying Zhang,Qi-Mo Zhang,Shen-Qi Wang,Gang Li,Jin-Gang Zhang (2011). Nanoparticle-based bio-barcode assay for the detection of bluetongue virus. Journal of Virological Methods, 178(1-2), 225-228.
  32. 32. Primchanien Moongkarndi,Ekkarat Rodpai,Sasitorn Kanarat (2011). Evaluation of an immunochromatographic assay for rapid detection of Salmonella enterica serovars Typhimurium and Enteritidis. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, 23(4), 797-801.
  33. 33. Yan Zhou,Ying Kong,Subrata Kundu,Jeffrey Cirillo,Hong Liang (2012). Antibacterial activities of gold and silver nanoparticles against Escherichia coli and bacillus Calmette-GuΓ©rin. Journal of Nanobiotechnology, 10(1), 19-19.
  34. 34. X Tan (2012). Development of an immunosensor assay for detection of haptoglobin in mastitic milk. Veterinary Clinical Pathology, 41.
  35. 35. Xiaoqiang Wang,Erle Dang,Jinzhuai Gao,Sen Guo,Zheng Li (2013). Development of a gold nanoparticle-based oligonucleotide microarray for simultaneous detection of seven swine viruses. Journal of Virological Methods, 191(1), 9-15.
  36. 36. Kai Meng,Wenjing Sun,Peng Zhao,Limei Zhang,Dongjie Cai,Ziqiang Cheng,Huijun Guo,Jianzhu Liu,Dubao Yang,Shujing Wang,Tongjie Chai (2013). Development of colloidal gold-based immunochromatographic assay for rapid detection of Mycoplasma suis in porcine plasma. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 55, 396-399.
  37. 37. Kui Zhu,Richard Dietrich,Andrea Didier,Dominik Doyscher,Erwin MΓ€rtlbauer (2014). Recent Developments in Antibody-Based Assays for the Detection of Bacterial Toxins. Toxins, 6(4), 1325-1348.
  38. 38. Ronald Erskine,Sarah Wagner,Fred Degraves (2003). Mastitis therapy and pharmacology. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice, 19(1), 109-138.
  39. 39. Henri Seegers,Christine Fourichon,FranοΏ½ois Beaudeau (2003). Production effects related to mastitis and mastitis economics in dairy cattle herds. Veterinary Research, 34(5), 475-491.
  40. 40. A Jalal,N Rashid,N Ahmed,S Iftikhar,M Akhtar (2011). Escherichia coli signal peptidase recognizes and cleaves the signal sequence of xylanase from a newly isolated Bacillus subtilis strain R5. Biochemistry (Moscow), 76(3), 347-349.
  41. 41. Indu Bajpai,Naresh Saha,Bikramjit Basu (2012). Moderate intensity static magnetic field has bactericidal effect on E. coli and S. epidermidis on sintered hydroxyapatite. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials, 100B(5), 1206-1217.
  42. 42. A Manuja (2015). Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles: Opportunities and Challenges in Veterinary Sciences. Immunome Research, 11.
  43. 43. J Dobson,S Samuel,H Milstein,K Rogers,J Wood (2002). Canine neoplasia in the UK: estimates of incidence rates from a population of insured dogs. Journal of Small Animal Practice, 43(6), 240-246.
  44. 44. G Borzacchiello,A Corteggio (2009). Equine sarcoid: State of the art. Ippologia, 20, 7-14.
  45. 45. Asmaa Metwally,Abdel-Nasser Abdel-Hady,Khaled Ebnalwaled,Samy Morad,Ahmed Soliman (2020). Wound-Healing Activity of Green and Chemical Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles (ZnO-NPs) Gels in Equine Wounds: A clinical Study. SVU-International Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 3(1), 66-79.
  46. 46. T Santhoshkumar (2012). Evaluation of stem aqueous extract and synthesized silver nanoparticles using Cissus quadrangularis against Hippobosca maculata and Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus. Experimental parasitology, 132(2), 156-165.
  47. 47. A Arenal,M Molento (2015). Nanotechnology: Meeting the future of Veterinary Parasitology Research. Pesquisa VeterinΓ‘ria Brasileira, 35, 842-843.
  48. 48. M Danesh-Bahreini (2011). Nanovaccine for leishmaniasis: preparation of chitosan nanoparticles containing Leishmania superoxide dismutase and evaluation of its immunogenicity in BALB/c mice. International journal of nanomedicine, 6, 835-842.
  49. 49. Tarek Hamouda,Joyce Sutcliffe,Susan Ciotti,James Baker (2011). Intranasal Immunization of Ferrets with Commercial Trivalent Influenza Vaccines Formulated in a Nanoemulsion-Based Adjuvant. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, 18(7), 1167-1175.
  50. 50. Sonja Maree,Francois Maree,John Putterill,Tjaart De Beer,Henk Huismans,Jacques Theron (2016). Synthesis of empty african horse sickness virus particles. Virus Research, 213, 184-194.
  51. 51. A El-Sayed,M Kamel (2020). Advanced applications of nanotechnology in veterinary medicine. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(16), 19073-19086.
  52. 52. A Bilgili,M (2019). Use Areas of Nanotechnology in Veterinary Medicine. Journal of Food Science and Engineering, 9.
  53. 53. P Rolfe (2010). Medical and biological measurement with micro- and nanosensors. Optoelectronics, Instrumentation and Data Processing, 46(4), 324-328.
  54. 54. B Sekhon (2012). Drug-drug co-crystals. Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, 20(1), 45-45.
  55. 55. Suresh Neethirajan,Satish Tuteja,Sheng-Tung Huang,David Kelton (2017). Recent advancement in biosensors technology for animal and livestock health management. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 98, 398-407.
  56. 56. Nir Peled,Radu Ionescu,Pauline Nol,Orna Barash,Matt Mccollum,Kurt Vercauteren,Matthew Koslow,Randal Stahl,Jack Rhyan,Hossam Haick (2012). Detection of volatile organic compounds in cattle naturally infected with Mycobacterium bovis. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 171-172, 588-594.
  57. 57. Ding-Ping Bai,Xin-Yu Lin,Yi-Fan Huang,Xi-Feng Zhang (2018). Theranostics Aspects of Various Nanoparticles in Veterinary Medicine. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 19(11), 3299.
  58. 58. N Din,Effects,Nano-Zinc And Nano-Selenium Dietary,Addition (2019). Unknown Title. Egyptian Journal of Nutrition and Feeds, 22, 79-89.
  59. 59. M Ahmadi,J Ahmadi (2009). Application of Different Levels of Silver Nanoparticles in Food on the Performance and Some Blood Parameters of Broiler Chickens. World Applied Sciences Journal, 7, 24-27.
  60. 60. K Moustafa (2015). Effect of Dietary Nanosilver on Broiler Performance. International Journal of Poultry Science, 14, 177-182.
  61. 61. Maciej BΔ…kowski,BoΕΌena Kiczorowska,Wioletta SamoliΕ„ska,Renata Klebaniuk,Antoni Lipiec (2018). Silver and Zinc Nanoparticles in Animal Nutrition – A Review. Annals of Animal Science, 18(4), 879-898.
  62. 62. K.-T Lee (2010). Quality and safety aspects of meat products as affected by various physical manipulations of packaging materials. Meat science, 86, 138-150.
  63. 63. Partha Swain,D Rajendran,S Rao,George Dominic (2015). Preparation and effects of nano mineral particle feeding in livestock: A review. Veterinary World, 8(7), 888-891.
  64. 64. Graziella Joanitti,Luciano Silva (2013). The Emerging Potential of By-Products as Platforms for Drug Delivery Systems. Current Drug Targets, 15(5), 478-485.
  65. 65. Joseph Saragusty,Amir Arav (2010). Current progress in oocyte and embryo cryopreservation by slow freezing and vitrification. Reproduction, 141(1), 1-19.
  66. 66. N Scott (2007). Nanoscience in Veterinary Medicine. Veterinary Research Communications, 31(S1), 139-144.
  67. 67. D Archana,Brijesh Singh,Joydeep Dutta,P Dutta (2013). In vivo evaluation of chitosan–PVP–titanium dioxide nanocomposite as wound dressing material. Carbohydrate Polymers, 95(1), 530-539.
  68. 68. Ling Ing,Noraziah Zin,Atif Sarwar,Haliza Katas (2012). Antifungal Activity of Chitosan Nanoparticles and Correlation with Their Physical Properties. International Journal of Biomaterials, 2012, 1-9.
  69. 69. K Divya (2017). Antimicrobial properties of chitosan nanoparticles: Mode of action and factors affecting activity. Fibers and Polymers, 18(2), 221-230.
  70. 70. El-Refaie Kenawy,F Abdel-Hay,Ahmed El-Magd,Yehia Mahmoud (2005). Biologically Active Polymers: Modification and Anti-microbial Activity of Chitosan Derivatives. Journal of Bioactive and Compatible Polymers, 20(1), 95-111.
  71. 71. M Benhabiles,R Salah,H Lounici,N Drouiche,M Goosen,N Mameri (2012). Antibacterial activity of chitin, chitosan and its oligomers prepared from shrimp shell waste. Food Hydrocolloids, 29(1), 48-56.
  72. 72. George Roberts (1992). Chitin Chemistry. Chitin chemistry
  73. 73. Aslak Einbu,Kjell VΓ₯rum (2008). Characterization of Chitin and Its Hydrolysis to GlcNAc and GlcN. Biomacromolecules, 9(7), 1870-1875.
  74. 74. Santosh Kumar,Joonseok Koh (2012). Physiochemical and optical study of chitosan–terephthaldehyde derivative for biomedical applications. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 51(5), 1167-1172.
  75. 75. K Divya,M Jisha (2018). Chitosan nanoparticles preparation and applications. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 16(1), 101-112.
  76. 76. N Van Toan,T Hanh,P Thien (2013). Antibacterial Activity of Chitosan on Some Common Food Contaminating Microbes. The Open Biomaterials Journal, 4, 1-5.
  77. 77. Maximiano Ribeiro,Ana Espiga,Daniela Silva,PatrΓ­cia Baptista,Joaquim Henriques,Catarina Ferreira,Jorge Silva,JoΓ£o Borges,Eduardo Pires,Paula Chaves,IlΓ­dio Correia (2009). Development of a new chitosan hydrogel for wound dressing. Wound Repair and Regeneration, 17(6), 817-824.
  78. 78. Aleksandra GrzΔ…bka-ZasadziΕ„ska,Tazdin Amietszajew,SΕ‚awomir Borysiak (2017). Thermal and mechanical properties of chitosan nanocomposites with cellulose modified in ionic liquids. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 130(1), 143-154.
  79. 79. Alexander Gamboa,Valeria Araujo,Nelson Caro,Martin Gotteland,Lilian Abugoch,Cristian Tapia (2015). Spray Freeze-Drying as an Alternative to the Ionic Gelation Method to Produce Chitosan and Alginate Nano-Particles Targeted to the Colon. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 104(12), 4373-4385.
  80. 80. B Rizeq (2019). Synthesis, bioapplications, and toxicity evaluation of chitosan-based nanoparticles. International journal of molecular sciences, 20(22), 5776.
  81. 81. W Tiyaboonchai (2013). Chitosan Nanoparticles: A Promising System for Drug Delivery. Naresuan University Journal: Science and Technology (NUJST), 51-66.
  82. 82. Abbaraju Krishna Sailaja,Pamulaparti Swati (2011). Preparation and Characterization of Sulphasalazine Loaded Nanoparticles by Nanoprecipitation and Ionotropic Gelation Techniques Using Various Polymers. Current Nanomedicine, 7(2), 45-50.
  83. 83. T Dai (2009). Chitosan Acetate Bandage as a Topical Antimicrobial Dressing for Infected Burns. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 53(2), 393-400.
  84. 84. Yolanda Garcia,Brendan Wilkins,Russell Collighan,Martin Griffin,Abhay Pandit (2008). Towards development of a dermal rudiment for enhanced wound healing response. Biomaterials, 29(7), 857-868.
  85. 85. Shin-Yeu Ong,Jian Wu,Shabbir Moochhala,Mui-Hong Tan,Jia Lu (2008). Development of a chitosan-based wound dressing with improved hemostatic and antimicrobial properties. Biomaterials, 29(32), 4323-4332.
  86. 86. Keisuke Mizuno,Keiko Yamamura,Kohji Yano,Takashi Osada,Satomi Saeki,Norio Takimoto,Tsunehisa Sakurai,Yuji Nimura (2003). Effect of chitosan film containing basic fibroblast growth factor on wound healing in genetically diabetic mice. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 64A(1), 177-181.
  87. 87. Sevda Şenel,Susan Mcclure (2004). Potential applications of chitosan in veterinary medicine. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 56(10), 1467-1480.
  88. 88. Entsar Rabea,Null- Badawy,Christian Stevens,Guy Smagghe,Walter Steurbaut (2003). Chitosan as Antimicrobial Agent: Applications and Mode of Action. Biomacromolecules, 4(6), 1457-1465.
  89. 89. Mohamed Badawy,Entsar Rabea (2011). A Biopolymer Chitosan and Its Derivatives as Promising Antimicrobial Agents against Plant Pathogens and Their Applications in Crop Protection. International Journal of Carbohydrate Chemistry, 2011, 1-29.
  90. 90. Jackson Champer,Julie Patel,Nathalie Fernando,Elaheh Salehi,Victoria Wong,Jenny Kim (2013). Chitosan against cutaneous pathogens. AMB Express, 3(1), 37.
  91. 91. M Ratajska (2003). Studies on the biodegradation of chitosan in an aqueous medium. Fibres and Textiles in Eastern Europe, 11, 75-79.
  92. 92. E Decker,C Von Ohle,R Weiger,I Wiech,M Brecx (2005). A synergistic chlorhexidine/chitosan combination for improved antiplaque strategies. Journal of Periodontal Research, 40(5), 373-377.
  93. 93. H Ghorbani (2017). In vitro synergy of antibiotic combinations against planktonic and biofilm Pseudomonas aeruginosa. GMS hygiene and infection control, 12, 17-17.
  94. 94. Pelin Aksungur,Arzu Sungur,Serhat Ünal,Alper İskit,Christopher Squier,Sevda Şenel (2004). Chitosan delivery systems for the treatment of oral mucositis: in vitro and in vivo studies. Journal of Controlled Release, 98(2), 269-279.
  95. 95. G İkinci,S Şenel,H Akıncıbay,S Kaş,S Erciş,C Wilson,A Hıncal (2002). Effect of chitosan on a periodontal pathogen Porphyromonas gingivalis. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 235(1-2), 121-127.
  96. 96. Anil Anal,Willem Stevens (2005). Chitosan–alginate multilayer beads for controlled release of ampicillin. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 290(1-2), 45-54.
  97. 97. Y Korystov (2004). Avermectins inhibit multidrug resistance of tumor cells. Avermectins inhibit multidrug resistance of tumor cells, 493, 57-64.
  98. 98. S Motwani,S Chopra,S Talegaonkar,K Kohli,F Ahmad,R Khar (2008). Chitosan–sodium alginate nanoparticles as submicroscopic reservoirs for ocular delivery: Formulation, optimisation and in vitro characterisation. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 68(3), 513-525.
  99. 99. Xingyi Li,Xiangye Kong,Zhaoliang Zhang,Kaihui Nan,Lingli Li,Xianhou Wang,Hao Chen (2012). Cytotoxicity and biocompatibility evaluation of N,O-carboxymethyl chitosan/oxidized alginate hydrogel for drug delivery application. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 50(5), 1299-1305.
  100. 100. R Muzzarelli (2007). Chitin nanofibrils/chitosan glycolate composites as wound medicaments. Carbohydrate Polymers, 70, 101.
  101. 101. D Archana,Brijesh Singh,Joydeep Dutta,P Dutta (2013). In vivo evaluation of chitosan–PVP–titanium dioxide nanocomposite as wound dressing material. Carbohydrate Polymers, 95(1), 530-539.
  102. 102. Tao Wang,Yan Zheng,Yaping Shen,Yijie Shi,Fang Li,Chang Su,Liang Zhao (2017). Chitosan nanoparticles loaded hydrogels promote skin wound healing through the modulation of reactive oxygen species. Artificial Cells, Nanomedicine, and Biotechnology, 46(sup1), 138-149.
  103. 103. Amin Zhang,Haibo Mu,Wuxia Zhang,Guoting Cui,Jie Zhu,Jinyou Duan (2013). Chitosan Coupling Makes Microbial Biofilms Susceptible to Antibiotics. Scientific Reports, 3(1)
  104. 104. Wenjuan Gao,James Lai,Solomon Leung (2012). Functional enhancement of chitosan and nanoparticles in cell culture, tissue engineering, and pharmaceutical applications. Frontiers in Physiology, 3, 105.
  105. 105. H No (2002). Antibacterial activity of chitosans and chitosan oligomers with different molecular weights. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 74(1-2), 65-72.
  106. 106. Anil Kishen,Zhilong Shi,Annie Shrestha,Koon Neoh (2009). An Investigation on the Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Efficacy of Cationic Nanoparticulates for Root Canal Disinfection. Journal of Endodontics, 34(12), 1515-1520.
  107. 107. Lifeng Qi,Zirong Xu,Xia Jiang,Caihong Hu,Xiangfei Zou (2004). Preparation and antibacterial activity of chitosan nanoparticles. Carbohydrate Research, 339(16), 2693-2700.
  108. 108. R Goy,D Britto,O Assis,Mekahlia (2009). Chitosan-Copper (II) complex as antibacterial agent: synthesis, characterization and coordinating bond-activity correlation study. Polimeros-ciencia E Tecnologia -POLIMEROS, 2(3), 1045-1053.
  109. 109. Zhimei Zhong,Ronge Xing,Song Liu,Lin Wang,Shengbao Cai,Pengcheng Li (2008). Synthesis of acyl thiourea derivatives of chitosan and their antimicrobial activities in vitro. Carbohydrate Research, 343(3), 566-570.
  110. 110. L ChΓ‘vez De Paz (2011). Antimicrobial Effect of Chitosan Nanoparticles on Streptococcus mutans Biofilms. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 77(11), 63-73.
  111. 111. M Kong (2006). Antimicrobial properties of chitosan and mode of action: A state of the art review. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 144(1), 115.
  112. 112. Shun-Hsien Chang,Hong-Ting Victor Lin,Guan-James Wu,Guo Tsai (2015). pH Effects on solubility, zeta potential, and correlation between antibacterial activity and molecular weight of chitosan. Carbohydrate Polymers, 134, 74-81.
  113. 113. Jianhui Li,Yiguang Wu,Liqing Zhao (2016). Antibacterial activity and mechanism of chitosan with ultra high molecular weight. Carbohydrate Polymers, 148, 200-205.
  114. 114. Islem Younes,Sabrine Sellimi,Marguerite Rinaudo,Kemel Jellouli,Moncef Nasri (2014). Influence of acetylation degree and molecular weight of homogeneous chitosans on antibacterial and antifungal activities. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 185, 57-63.
  115. 115. Xiao-Fang Li,Xiao-Qiang Feng,Sheng Yang,Guo-Qing Fu,Ting-Pu Wang,Zhong-Xing Su (2010). Chitosan kills Escherichia coli through damage to be of cell membrane mechanism. Carbohydrate Polymers, 79(3), 493-499.
  116. 116. Frans Tamara,Chi Lin,Fwu-Long Mi,Yi-Cheng Ho (2018). Antibacterial Effects of Chitosan/Cationic Peptide Nanoparticles. Nanomaterials, 8(2), 88.
  117. 117. Tao Wang,Yan Zheng,Yaping Shen,Yijie Shi,Fang Li,Chang Su,Liang Zhao (2017). Chitosan nanoparticles loaded hydrogels promote skin wound healing through the modulation of reactive oxygen species. Artificial Cells, Nanomedicine, and Biotechnology, 46(sup1), 138-149.
  118. 118. Parteek Prasher,Manjeet Singh,Harish Mudila (2018). Silver nanoparticles as antimicrobial therapeutics: current perspectives and future challenges. 3 Biotech, 8(10), 411-122.
  119. 119. R Cuero,G Osuji,A Washington (1991). N-carboxymethylchitosan inhibition of aflatoxin production: Role of zinc. Biotechnology Letters, 13(6), 441-444.
  120. 120. Y Mori (2013). Antiviral activity of silver nanoparticle/chitosan composites against H1N1 influenza A virus. Nanoscale Research Letters, 8(1), 93-124.
  121. 121. E Russo,N Gaglianone,S Baldassari,B Parodi,S Cafaggi,C Zibana,M Donalisio,V Cagno,D Lembo,G Caviglioli (2014). Preparation, characterization and in vitro antiviral activity evaluation of foscarnet-chitosan nanoparticles. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 118, 117-125.
  122. 122. Irina Kalashnikova,Soumen Das,Sudipta Seal (2015). Nanomaterials for Wound Healing: Scope and Advancement. Nanomedicine, 10(16), 2593-2612.
  123. 123. Ilaria Tocco,Barbara Zavan,Franco Bassetto,Vincenzo Vindigni (2012). Nanotechnology‐Based Therapies for Skin Wound Regeneration. Journal of Nanomaterials, 2012(1), 714134-714127.
  124. 124. Alan Lansdown (2006). Silver in Health Care: Antimicrobial Effects and Safety in Use. Current Problems in Dermatology, 33, 17-34.
  125. 125. Pathum Chandika,Seok-Chun Ko,Won-Kyo Jung (2015). Marine-derived biological macromolecule-based biomaterials for wound healing and skin tissue regeneration. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 77, 24-35.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Asmaa A. Metwally, AbdulRahman A. Saied. 2020. "Nanotechnology and Chitosan Nanoparticles in Veterinary Medicine". Global Journal of Medical Research - B: Pharma, Drug Discovery, Toxicology & Medicine GJMR-B Volume 20 (GJMR Volume 20 Issue B7).

More Citation Formats

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjmra

Print ISSN 0975-5888

e-ISSN 2249-4618

Keywords
Classification
GJMR-B Classification NLMC Code: WC 900
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date
October 19, 2020

Language
English
Order Article Reprint
Experience in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 636
Total Downloads: 32
All Trends

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Nanotechnology and Chitosan Nanoparticles in Veterinary Medicine

Asmaa Metwally
Asmaa Metwally
AbdulRahman Saied
AbdulRahman Saied