Normative Model of Global History

1
Plokhotnikov Konstantin Eduardovich
Plokhotnikov Konstantin Eduardovich

Send Message

To: Author

GJSFR Volume 22 Issue A5

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

SFR4C1F0

Normative Model of Global History Banner
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

The global (geo)political system is determined. The first, elementary interpretation of the concept of freedom and its calculus is introduced. Two global metahistorical goals of the realms of freedom and necessity have been identified. The basic aspects of modeling history, right and left in politics, tradition, innovation, progress are determined. The concept of an “actor” (a player, a decision-maker) is formulated. The formulation of the moral code of actors is given. The inevitability of actors’ awareness of the choice between the realms of freedom and necessity is discussed, which leads to a second, deeper interpretation of the concept of freedom. The space and time of actors are discussed, and the relevant aspects of the transition between two target sets of actors are listed. The content of ethics is determined, providing a return to the realm of freedom and necessity. Metaethics of the outcome of choice -the third interpretation of the category of freedom.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

Plokhotnikov Konstantin Eduardovich. 2026. \u201cNormative Model of Global History\u201d. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - A: Physics & Space Science GJSFR-A Volume 22 (GJSFR Volume 22 Issue A5): .

Download Citation

High-quality academic journal publishing research in physics, space, and global history.
Issue Cover
GJSFR Volume 22 Issue A5
Pg. 33- 59
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJSFR

Print ISSN 0975-5896

e-ISSN 2249-4626

Keywords
Classification
GJSFR-A Classification: DDC Code: 170.42 LCC Code: BJ37
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

September 23, 2022

Language

English

Experiance in AR

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Read in 3D

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 1409
Total Downloads: 27
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research

Published Article

The global (geo)political system is determined. The first, elementary interpretation of the concept of freedom and its calculus is introduced. Two global metahistorical goals of the realms of freedom and necessity have been identified. The basic aspects of modeling history, right and left in politics, tradition, innovation, progress are determined. The concept of an “actor” (a player, a decision-maker) is formulated. The formulation of the moral code of actors is given. The inevitability of actors’ awareness of the choice between the realms of freedom and necessity is discussed, which leads to a second, deeper interpretation of the concept of freedom. The space and time of actors are discussed, and the relevant aspects of the transition between two target sets of actors are listed. The content of ethics is determined, providing a return to the realm of freedom and necessity. Metaethics of the outcome of choice -the third interpretation of the category of freedom.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]
×

This Page is Under Development

We are currently updating this article page for a better experience.

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Normative Model of Global History

Plokhotnikov Konstantin Eduardovich
Plokhotnikov Konstantin Eduardovich

Research Journals