Nutritional Quality of Osmotically Dehydrated Catfish (Clarias garipinus) and Beef as Influenced by Sodium Chloride Concentration

Nutritional Quality of Osmotically Dehydrated Catfish (Clarias garipinus) and Beef as Influenced by Sodium Chloride Concentration

Burubai,Woyengiebinipre

Contact

Burubai

Contact

G. W.

Contact

Samson

Contact

D.J.

Contact

Etekpe

Contact

Niger Delta University

Nutritional Quality of Osmotically Dehydrated Catfish (Clarias garipinus) and Beef as Influenced by Sodium Chloride Concentration

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

D74JR

Nutritional Quality of Osmotically Dehydrated Catfish (Clarias garipinus) and Beef as Influenced by Sodium Chloride Concentration Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

In this work, the influence of sodium chloride (solute) concentration on the nutritional quality of osmotically dehydrated Catfish and beef were evaluated, using vitamin C as quality marker. Results show that at 95% confidence interval, NaCl concentrations play significant role in the stability of vitamin C in both catfish muscle and beef during osmotic dehydration. The vitamin C value of catfish degraded from 20.5% to 88.76% for corresponding NaCl concentration levels of 10% to 90% respectively. For beef, 18.46% to 69.23% reduction of vitamin C was recorded for respective 10% to 90% NaCl concentration. It is therefore advised that if sodium chloride must be used as solute in the osmotic dehydration of the above agricultural products, then, the dehydrated products must be fortified with adequate vitamin C before consumption.

References

17 Cites in Article

Reference Format

A Abioye,V Abioye,Ade,I Beatrice (2013). Kinetic Modeling of ascorbic acid loss in baobab drink at pasteurization and storage temperatures.
J Alakali,C Ariahu,N Nkpa (2006). Kinetic of Osmotic dehydration of Mango.
S Andree,M Monica,Emilia (2006). Vitamin C degradation during storage of fortified Foods.
A Anoar,M Patricia,L Jose,Fernanda (2005). Influence of the Osmotic agent on the Osmotic dehydration of papaya.
Z Danijela,L Vera,L Lato,M Jamina,M Nevera (2013). Modified atmosphere packaging and Osmotic dehydration effect on pork quality and stability.
O Fennema (1997). Loss of vitamins in fresh and frozen foods.
Vladimir Filipovic,Biljana Curcic,Milica Nicetin,Dragana Plavsic,Gordana Koprivica,Nevena Misljenovic (2012). Mass transfer and microbiological profile of pork meat dehydrated in two different osmotic solutions.
L Gordon,E Samaniego (1990). Effect of soluble solids and temperature on ascorbic acid during storage.
O Kajihausa,P Sobukola,M Idowu,S Awonorin (2010). Nutrient contents and thermal degradation of vitamins in organically grown fluted pumpkin leaves.
C Kirby,C Whittle,Coxon,B Law (1991). Stabilization of ascorbic acid by microencapsulation in liposomes.
N Milica,F Vladimir,K Violeta,P Lato (2013). Mass transfer kinetics and efficiency of Osmotic dehydration of fish.
R Moazzam (2012). Osmotic dehydration techniques for fruits preservation -A review.
M Rao,C Lee,Katz,H Cooley (1981). A kinetic study of the loss of vitamin C, colour and firmness during thermal processing of canned peas.
Katsunori Saito,Abdulatef Ahhmed,Satoshi Kawahara,Yasushi Sugimoto,Takayoshi Aoki,Michio Muguruma (2009). Evaluation of the performance of osmotic dehydration sheets on freshness parameters in cold-stored beef biceps femoris muscle.
Kavita Tarade,Rekha Singhal,Radha Jayram,Aniruddha Pandit (2007). Kinetics of degradation of ODAP in Lathyrus sativus L. flour during food processing.
J Torres,P Talens,I Escriche,A Chiralt (2006). Influence of process conditions on mechanical properties of osmotically dehydrated mango.
V Vikram,M Ramesh,S Prapulla (2005). Thermal degradation kinetics of nutrients in orange juice heated by electromagnetic and conventional methods.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Burubai,Woyengiebinipre. 2015. \u201cNutritional Quality of Osmotically Dehydrated Catfish (Clarias garipinus) and Beef as Influenced by Sodium Chloride Concentration\u201d. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - C: Biological Science GJSFR-C Volume 15 (GJSFR Volume 15 Issue C2).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJSFR Volume 15 Issue C2

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJSFR

Print ISSN 0975-5896

e-ISSN 2249-4626

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJSFR-C Classification FOR Code: 069999

Submission ReceivedFebruary 27, 2015
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted March 22, 2015
Published April 5, 2015

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

May 9, 2015

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 106

Country: Nigeria

Subject: Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - C: Biological Science

Authors: Burubai, W., G. W., Samson, D.J., Etekpe (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 181

Total Views (Real + Logic): 4202

Total Downloads (simulated): 2137

Publish Date: 2015 05, Sat

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 51 views
Month 2: 63 views
Month 3: 50 views
Month 4: 31 views
Month 5: 29 views
Month 6: 26 views
Month 7: 17 views
Month 8: 28 views
Month 9: 38 views
Month 10: 21 views
Month 11: 37 views
Month 12: 24 views
Month 13: 41 views
Month 14: 25 views
Month 15: 31 views
Month 16: 24 views
Month 17: 28 views
Month 18: 32 views
Month 19: 35 views
Month 20: 21 views
Month 21: 24 views
Month 22: 30 views
Month 23: 17 views
Month 24: 32 views
Month 25: 40 views
Month 26: 41 views
Month 27: 27 views
Month 28: 27 views
Month 29: 37 views
Month 30: 25 views
Month 31: 31 views
Month 32: 26 views
Month 33: 24 views
Month 34: 25 views
Month 35: 16 views
Month 36: 29 views
Month 37: 49 views
Month 38: 28 views
Month 39: 31 views
Month 40: 32 views
Month 41: 31 views
Month 42: 23 views
Month 43: 29 views
Month 44: 40 views
Month 45: 35 views
Month 46: 38 views
Month 47: 38 views
Month 48: 27 views
Month 49: 27 views
Month 50: 37 views
Month 51: 30 views
Month 52: 36 views
Month 53: 36 views
Month 54: 38 views
Month 55: 34 views
Month 56: 32 views
Month 57: 35 views
Month 58: 40 views
Month 59: 17 views
Month 60: 15 views
Month 61: 36 views
Month 62: 20 views
Month 63: 40 views
Month 64: 48 views
Month 65: 13 views
Month 66: 25 views
Month 67: 25 views
Month 68: 34 views
Month 69: 39 views
Month 70: 32 views
Month 71: 31 views
Month 72: 28 views
Month 73: 28 views
Month 74: 29 views
Month 75: 16 views
Month 76: 12 views
Month 77: 48 views
Month 78: 49 views
Month 79: 18 views
Month 80: 32 views
Month 81: 28 views
Month 82: 25 views
Month 83: 31 views
Month 84: 28 views
Month 85: 22 views
Month 86: 23 views
Month 87: 36 views
Month 88: 28 views
Month 89: 27 views
Month 90: 33 views
Month 91: 14 views
Month 92: 44 views
Month 93: 24 views
Month 94: 28 views
Month 95: 31 views
Month 96: 37 views
Month 97: 26 views
Month 98: 40 views
Month 99: 26 views
Month 100: 34 views
Month 101: 17 views
Month 102: 31 views
Month 103: 42 views
Month 104: 35 views
Month 105: 23 views
Month 106: 41 views
Month 107: 39 views
Month 108: 45 views
Month 109: 21 views
Month 110: 27 views
Month 111: 20 views
Month 112: 35 views
Month 113: 26 views
Month 114: 32 views
Month 115: 30 views
Month 116: 25 views
Month 117: 28 views
Month 118: 32 views
Month 119: 20 views
Month 120: 22 views
Month 121: 41 views
Month 122: 16 views
Month 123: 33 views
Month 124: 28 views
Month 125: 12 views
Month 126: 26 views
Month 127: 30 views
Month 128: 23 views
Month 129: 18 views
Month 130: 58 views
Month 131: 52 views
Month 132: 54 views
Month 133: 25 views

Total Views: 4202

Total Downloads: 2137

2026 Trends

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]