Occupation of Sambisa Forest and Boko Haram Insurgency in Northeastern Nigeria as Security Threat and Challenges to Sustainable Forest Management

α
Aju P. C
Aju P. C
σ
Aju J. A
Aju J. A

Send Message

To: Author

Occupation of Sambisa Forest and Boko Haram Insurgency in Northeastern Nigeria as Security Threat and Challenges to Sustainable Forest Management

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

9H7N6

Occupation of Sambisa Forest and Boko Haram Insurgency in Northeastern Nigeria as Security Threat and Challenges to Sustainable Forest Management Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Abstract

Since 2013 when the Boko Haram insurgents found a safe haven in the Sambisa forest from where they launch their attacks on the Nigerian state, neither Nigeria nor the forest has known any peace ever since. Although the socioeconomic, socio-political and socio-cultural consequences of Boko Haram insurgency have been highlighted by many writers and researchers, nothing is yet known regarding its consequences on the Sambisa forest itself. With experiences from other parts of the globe, this paper highlights the factors linking forests with conflict. The first fact emerging from the research is that Nigeria is not the only country where conflicts have been linked with forests rather it is a common and worldwide phenomena, as countries experiencing violent conflict in their forests account for about 40 percent of the world’s tropical forests. Among factors linking forests with conflicts include their remoteness, seclusion, inaccessibility and richness and hence the ability to provide refuge, funds and food for combatants. Among the negative consequences of such conflicts on forest is the likelihood of its destruction and or occupation by the state forces in an effort to prevent insurgent groups from continuing using it as a hideout to carry out their criminal activities. This happens to be the fate of the Sambisa forest today. Based on its location, wide expanse and abundant content of wood and non-wood resources, it was not surprising that the insurgents found its confines very alluring hence its occupation. With the recapture of the Sambisa forest by the Nigerian military, she decided to be holding her Small Arms Championship and other sporting events in the forest as a way of keeping it permanently safe from insurgents. The implication of this development is that the forest has lost its reserve status.

References

43 Cites in Article
  1. Al Jazeera (2015). Boko Haram goes on deadly rampage after Chad offensive.
  2. A Ardo (2015). Nigeria military says still in Boko Haram stronghold despite Mines.
  3. (2016). The “Flight” of Boko Haram.
  4. D Biggs (2005). Managing a Rebel Landscape: Conservation, Pioneers and the Revolutionary Past in the U minh Forest Vietnam.
  5. April Taylor (2015). Ocean Shipping Container Availability Report, April 29, 2015.
  6. K Bodunrin (2014). McDougall, Richard Sedgwick, (29 May 1904–27 April 1983).
  7. K Bodunrin (2014). ‘Our Girls Were Kidnapped and They Did Not Do Anything’.
  8. W Buckingham (1982). Operation Ranch Hand: The Air Force and Herbicides in Southeast Asia, 1961-1971.
  9. J Carle (1998). Forest Industries and Log Trade Policy in Cambodia.
  10. Cifor (2003). CIFOR research abstracts 2002.
  11. (2005). Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor.
  12. M Corones (2015). Mapping Boko Haram's decline in Nigeria.
  13. D Cumming,C Mackie,S Magane,R Taylor (1994). Direcção Nacional de Florestas e Fauna Bravia 1994. Gorongosa-Marromeu: management plan for integrated conservation and development.
  14. (2017). Boko Haram.
  15. J Eniangho (2017). How safe is Sambisa Forest now? Vanguard News.
  16. C Ewokor (2015). WEST AFRICA: Regional Offensive Against Boko Haram Continues.
  17. Fao (2005). Forest and War, Forest and Peace.
  18. M Halle (2002). Q.
  19. T Hart,R Mwinyihali (2001). Armed Conflict and Biodiversity in Sub-Saharan Africa: The case of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC).
  20. Emily Harwell (2010). Forests in Fragile and Conflict-Affected States.
  21. David Kaimowitz,Angelica Fauné (2002). Contras and Comandantes.
  22. D Kaimowitz (2003). Forests and war, Forests and peace.
  23. Y Mbaya,H Malgwi (2010). Species list and status of Mammals and Birds in Sambisa Game Reserve, Borno State, Nigeria.
  24. J Mcneely (2003). Biodiversity, War and Tropical Forests.
  25. (2005). Mainstreaming Cross-cutting Issues.
  26. M Olugbade (2014). Nigeria: Sambisa Forest from Nature Conservation to Terrorists Haven.
  27. J Oglethorpe (2002). Wild‐Meat Use, Food Security, Livelihoods, and Conservation.
  28. P Omondi (2006). Total Aerial Count of Elephants and other Wildlife Species in Sambisa Game Reserve in Borno State, Nigeria by MIKE (Monitoring the Illegal Killing of Elephants) Program.
  29. Gordon Orians,E Pfeiffer (1970). Ecological Effects of the War in Vietnam.
  30. Andrew Plumptre (2003). Lessons Learned from On-the-Ground Conservation in Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
  31. S Price Forests and violent conflict in Sub-Saharan Africa (CIFOR occasional paper.
  32. M Renner (2002). Unknown Title.
  33. Samfu (2002). Contents.
  34. S Schroeder-Wildberg,A Carius (2003). Illegal logging, Conflict and the Business in Indonesia.
  35. D Searcey (2016). Nigeria Vexed by Boko Haram's Use of Women as Suicide Bombers.
  36. Taylor (2004). When Conflicts affects Forests.
  37. J Thomson,R Kanaan (2003). Conflict timber: Dimensions of the problem in Asia and Africa, Volume I: Synthesis report.
  38. T Rajicic,K Dehmer (2007). Analysis of wild <i>Lactuca</i> gene bank accessions and implications for wild species conservation..
  39. (2007). Afghanistan : post-conflict environmental assessment / United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)..
  40. (1998). Refugee operations and Environmental Management: Selected Lessons learned.
  41. (2024). Report of a workshop to launch the Global Oversight Committee and the Supply Chain Technical Support Mechanism for neglected tropical diseases, Geneva, Switzerland, 18-19 January 2024.
  42. Arthur Westing (1971). Ecological Effects of Military Defoliation on the Forests of South Vietnam.
  43. Lenora Steele,Zachary Sampsel (2005). Final Report for Clean, Reliable, Affordable Energy that Reflects the Values of the Pinoleville Pomo Nation.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Aju P. C. 2018. \u201cOccupation of Sambisa Forest and Boko Haram Insurgency in Northeastern Nigeria as Security Threat and Challenges to Sustainable Forest Management\u201d. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - D: Agriculture & Veterinary GJSFR-D Volume 18 (GJSFR Volume 18 Issue D5): .

Download Citation

Issue Cover
GJSFR Volume 18 Issue D5
Pg. 23- 31
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJSFR

Print ISSN 0975-5896

e-ISSN 2249-4626

Keywords
Classification
GJSFR-D Classification: FOR Code: 070501
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

July 14, 2018

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 3044
Total Downloads: 1508
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

Since 2013 when the Boko Haram insurgents found a safe haven in the Sambisa forest from where they launch their attacks on the Nigerian state, neither Nigeria nor the forest has known any peace ever since. Although the socioeconomic, socio-political and socio-cultural consequences of Boko Haram insurgency have been highlighted by many writers and researchers, nothing is yet known regarding its consequences on the Sambisa forest itself. With experiences from other parts of the globe, this paper highlights the factors linking forests with conflict. The first fact emerging from the research is that Nigeria is not the only country where conflicts have been linked with forests rather it is a common and worldwide phenomena, as countries experiencing violent conflict in their forests account for about 40 percent of the world’s tropical forests. Among factors linking forests with conflicts include their remoteness, seclusion, inaccessibility and richness and hence the ability to provide refuge, funds and food for combatants. Among the negative consequences of such conflicts on forest is the likelihood of its destruction and or occupation by the state forces in an effort to prevent insurgent groups from continuing using it as a hideout to carry out their criminal activities. This happens to be the fate of the Sambisa forest today. Based on its location, wide expanse and abundant content of wood and non-wood resources, it was not surprising that the insurgents found its confines very alluring hence its occupation. With the recapture of the Sambisa forest by the Nigerian military, she decided to be holding her Small Arms Championship and other sporting events in the forest as a way of keeping it permanently safe from insurgents. The implication of this development is that the forest has lost its reserve status.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Occupation of Sambisa Forest and Boko Haram Insurgency in Northeastern Nigeria as Security Threat and Challenges to Sustainable Forest Management

Aju P. C
Aju P. C
Aju J. A
Aju J. A

Research Journals