Occupation of Sambisa Forest and Boko Haram Insurgency in Northeastern Nigeria as Security Threat and Challenges to Sustainable Forest Management

Send Message

To: Author

Occupation of Sambisa Forest and Boko Haram Insurgency in Northeastern Nigeria as Security Threat and Challenges to Sustainable Forest Management

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

9H7N6

Occupation of Sambisa Forest and Boko Haram Insurgency in Northeastern Nigeria as Security Threat and Challenges to Sustainable Forest Management Banner

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
Reading Preferences
Font Size
Line Spacing
Background
This converted HTML version may contain rendering inconsistencies. Please refer to the PDF for the authoritative version, or click here to provide feedback.

Abstract

Since 2013 when the Boko Haram insurgents found a safe haven in the Sambisa forest from where they launch their attacks on the Nigerian state, neither Nigeria nor the forest has known any peace ever since. Although the socioeconomic, socio-political and socio-cultural consequences of Boko Haram insurgency have been highlighted by many writers and researchers, nothing is yet known regarding its consequences on the Sambisa forest itself. With experiences from other parts of the globe, this paper highlights the factors linking forests with conflict. The first fact emerging from the research is that Nigeria is not the only country where conflicts have been linked with forests rather it is a common and worldwide phenomena, as countries experiencing violent conflict in their forests account for about 40 percent of the world’s tropical forests. Among factors linking forests with conflicts include their remoteness, seclusion, inaccessibility and richness and hence the ability to provide refuge, funds and food for combatants. Among the negative consequences of such conflicts on forest is the likelihood of its destruction and or occupation by the state forces in an effort to prevent insurgent groups from continuing using it as a hideout to carry out their criminal activities. This happens to be the fate of the Sambisa forest today. Based on its location, wide expanse and abundant content of wood and non-wood resources, it was not surprising that the insurgents found its confines very alluring hence its occupation. With the recapture of the Sambisa forest by the Nigerian military, she decided to be holding her Small Arms Championship and other sporting events in the forest as a way of keeping it permanently safe from insurgents. The implication of this development is that the forest has lost its reserve status.

References

43 Cites in Article
  1. 1. Al Jazeera (2015). Boko Haram goes on deadly rampage after Chad offensive. AFP
  2. 2. A Ardo (2015). Nigeria military says still in Boko Haram stronghold despite Mines. Reuters
  3. 3. (2016). The β€œFlight” of Boko Haram. BBC News, 77-96.
  4. 4. D Biggs (2005). Managing a Rebel Landscape: Conservation, Pioneers and the Revolutionary Past in the U minh Forest Vietnam. Environmental History, 10(3), 448-476.
  5. 5. April Taylor (2015). Ocean Shipping Container Availability Report, April 29, 2015. Ocean Shipping Container Availability Report, April 29, 2015
  6. 6. K Bodunrin (2014). McDougall, Richard Sedgwick, (29 May 1904–27 April 1983). McDougall, Richard Sedgwick, (29 May 1904–27 April 1983)
  7. 7. K Bodunrin (2014). β€˜Our Girls Were Kidnapped and They Did Not Do Anything’. Boko Haram
  8. 8. W Buckingham (1982). Operation Ranch Hand: The Air Force and Herbicides in Southeast Asia, 1961-1971. Operation Ranch Hand: The Air Force and Herbicides in Southeast Asia 1961-1971
  9. 9. J Carle (1998). Forest Industries and Log Trade Policy in Cambodia. Forest Industries and Log Trade Policy in Cambodia
  10. 10. Cifor (2003). CIFOR research abstracts 2002. CIFOR research abstracts 2002
  11. 11. (2005). Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor. Chega! Final Report of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor
  12. 12. M Corones (2015). Mapping Boko Haram's decline in Nigeria. Reuters
  13. 13. D Cumming,C Mackie,S Magane,R Taylor (1994). DirecΓ§Γ£o Nacional de Florestas e Fauna Bravia 1994. Gorongosa-Marromeu: management plan for integrated conservation and development. DirecΓ§Γ£o Nacional de Florestas e Fauna Bravia 1994. Gorongosa-Marromeu: management plan for integrated conservation and development
  14. 14. (2017). Boko Haram. Al-Shabaab and Boko Haram, 151-163.
  15. 15. J Eniangho (2017). How safe is Sambisa Forest now? Vanguard News. How safe is Sambisa Forest now? Vanguard News
  16. 16. C Ewokor (2015). WEST AFRICA: Regional Offensive Against Boko Haram Continues. Africa Research Bulletin: Political, Social and Cultural Series, 52(4)
  17. 17. Fao (2005). Forest and War, Forest and Peace. State of the World's Forests 2005, 116-123.
  18. 18. M Halle (2002). Q. Der Bezirk Halle, 360-385.
  19. 19. T Hart,R Mwinyihali (2001). Armed Conflict and Biodiversity in Sub-Saharan Africa: The case of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Armed Conflict and Biodiversity in Sub-Saharan Africa: The case of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC)
  20. 20. Emily Harwell (2010). Forests in Fragile and Conflict-Affected States. Forests in Fragile and Conflictaffected States, Program on Forests (PROFOR), 1-71.
  21. 21. David Kaimowitz,Angelica FaunΓ© (2002). Contras and Comandantes. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 16(3-4), 21-46.
  22. 22. D Kaimowitz (2003). Forests and war, Forests and peace. Forests and war, Forests and peace
  23. 23. Y Mbaya,H Malgwi (2010). Species list and status of Mammals and Birds in Sambisa Game Reserve, Borno State, Nigeria. Journal of Research in Forestry, Wildlife and Environment, 2(1), 135.
  24. 24. J Mcneely (2003). Biodiversity, War and Tropical Forests. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 16(3-4), 1-20.
  25. 25. (2005). Mainstreaming Cross-cutting Issues. OECD Issues Brief. Development Assistant Committee (DAC): Mainstreaming Conflict Prevention, 1-8.
  26. 26. M Olugbade (2014). Nigeria: Sambisa Forest from Nature Conservation to Terrorists Haven. THISDAY
  27. 27. J Oglethorpe (2002). Wild‐Meat Use, Food Security, Livelihoods, and Conservation. Conservation Biology, 16(3), 580-583.
  28. 28. P Omondi (2006). Total Aerial Count of Elephants and other Wildlife Species in Sambisa Game Reserve in Borno State, Nigeria by MIKE (Monitoring the Illegal Killing of Elephants) Program. Total Aerial Count of Elephants and other Wildlife Species in Sambisa Game Reserve in Borno State, Nigeria by MIKE (Monitoring the Illegal Killing of Elephants) Program
  29. 29. Gordon Orians,E Pfeiffer (1970). Ecological Effects of the War in Vietnam. Science, 168(3931), 544-554.
  30. 30. Andrew Plumptre (2003). Lessons Learned from On-the-Ground Conservation in Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 16(3-4), 69-88.
  31. 31. S Price Forests and violent conflict in Sub-Saharan Africa (CIFOR occasional paper. Forests and violent conflict in Sub-Saharan Africa (CIFOR occasional paper
  32. 32. M Renner (2002). Unknown Title.
  33. 33. Samfu (2002). Contents. Beyond Plunder, vii-x.
  34. 34. S Schroeder-Wildberg,A Carius (2003). Illegal logging, Conflict and the Business in Indonesia. Illegal logging, Conflict and the Business in Indonesia
  35. 35. D Searcey (2016). Nigeria Vexed by Boko Haram's Use of Women as Suicide Bombers. New York Times
  36. 36. Taylor (2004). When Conflicts affects Forests. Unasylva, 217(2)
  37. 37. J Thomson,R Kanaan (2003). Conflict timber: Dimensions of the problem in Asia and Africa, Volume I: Synthesis report. Conflict timber: Dimensions of the problem in Asia and Africa, Volume I: Synthesis report
  38. 38. T Rajicic,K Dehmer (2007). Analysis of wild Lactuca gene bank accessions and implications for wild species conservation. Crop wild relative conservation and use, 429-436.
  39. 39. (2007). Afghanistan : post-conflict environmental assessment / United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Afghanistan : post-conflict environmental assessment / United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)., 40
  40. 40. (1998). Refugee operations and Environmental Management: Selected Lessons learned. Refugee operations and Environmental Management: Selected Lessons learned, 41
  41. 41. (2024). Report of a workshop to launch the Global Oversight Committee and the Supply Chain Technical Support Mechanism for neglected tropical diseases, Geneva, Switzerland, 18-19 January 2024. Report of a workshop to launch the Global Oversight Committee and the Supply Chain Technical Support Mechanism for neglected tropical diseases, Geneva, Switzerland, 18-19 January 2024
  42. 42. Arthur Westing (1971). Ecological Effects of Military Defoliation on the Forests of South Vietnam. BioScience, 21(17), 893-898.
  43. 43. Lenora Steele,Zachary Sampsel (2005). Final Report for Clean, Reliable, Affordable Energy that Reflects the Values of the Pinoleville Pomo Nation. Produced by the US Agency for International Development Office of Conflict Management and Mitigation, 1300, 1-25.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Aju P. C. 2018. "Occupation of Sambisa Forest and Boko Haram Insurgency in Northeastern Nigeria as Security Threat and Challenges to Sustainable Forest Management". Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - D: Agriculture & Veterinary GJSFR-D Volume 18 (GJSFR Volume 18 Issue D5).

More Citation Formats

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJSFR

Print ISSN 0975-5896

e-ISSN 2249-4626

Keywords
Classification
GJSFR-D Classification FOR Code: 070501
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date
July 14, 2018

Language
English
Order Article Reprint
Experience in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 1.1K
Total Downloads: 93
All Trends

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Occupation of Sambisa Forest and Boko Haram Insurgency in Northeastern Nigeria as Security Threat and Challenges to Sustainable Forest Management

Aju C
Aju C