On Normalisation Performance Scores Models: An Illustrative Case Study

Send Message

To: Author

On Normalisation Performance Scores Models: An Illustrative Case Study

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

MBRKQIUU

On Normalisation Performance Scores Models: An Illustrative Case Study Banner

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
Reading Preferences
Font Size
Line Spacing
Background

References

22 Cites in Article
  1. (2001). CBS News/New York Times Monthly Poll, March 2001.
  2. R Adler (2011). Performance management and organisational strategy: How to design systems that meet the needs of confrontation strategy firms.
  3. M Armstrong,A Baron (1998). Performance management: the new realities.
  4. M Armstrong (2010). Armstrong’s Handbook of Human-resource Management Practice (11th ed.).
  5. Armstrong Baron,A (1998). Out of the Tick Box.
  6. M Bhengu,M Bussin (2009). The perceived effectiveness of employee share options as a mechanism of talent management in South Africa.
  7. Shannon Burger (2006). An Alternative Method to Forced Distribution as a Means of Evaluating Employee Performance.
  8. V Chau (2008). The Relationship of Strategic Performance Management to team strategy, company performance and organisational effectiveness.
  9. R Desimone,J Werner,D Harris (2002). Human Resource Development (3rd ed.).
  10. C Harbring,J Berger,D Sliwka (2010). Performance Appraisals and the Impact of Forced Distribution: An Experimental Investigation.
  11. E Lawler,G Benson,M Mc Dermatt (2012). Performance Management and Reward System.
  12. F Lenenburg (2012). Performance Appraisal: Methods and Rating Errors.
  13. B Mujtaba,S Shuaib (2010). <i>Current Procedural Terminology</i> Category II Codes.
  14. A O'callaghan (2005). Performance Management: SDFs in the Fasset Sector.
  15. A Sarkar,A Mukhopadhyay,S Ghosh (2011). Comparison of Performance Appraisal Score: A Modified Methodology.
  16. S Saxena (2010). Performance Management System.
  17. Shah (2012). The Impact of HR Dimensions on Organisational Performance.
  18. Susan Stewart,Melissa Gruys,Maria Storm (2010). Forced distribution performance evaluation systems: Advantages, disadvantages and keys to implementation.
  19. M Svaranja (2010). Integrated Performance Management Systems.
  20. M Willie (2014). Analysis of performance reward models: A Multinum Investments case study.
  21. Zewotirt (2012). On employees' performance appraisal: the impact and treatment of the rater's effect.
  22. Y Zhang (2004). The impact of performance management system on the employee: Analysis with WERS.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Mncedisi Michael Willie. 2018. "On Normalisation Performance Scores Models: An Illustrative Case Study". Global Journal of Management and Business Research - A: Administration & Management GJMBR-A Volume 18 (GJMBR Volume 18 Issue A1).

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJMBR

Print ISSN 0975-5853

e-ISSN 2249-4588

Keywords
Classification
GJMBR-A Classification JEL Code: H89
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date
January 25, 2018

Language
English
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 801
Total Downloads: 36
All Trends

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

On Normalisation Performance Scores Models: An Illustrative Case Study

Mncedisi Willie
Mncedisi Willie