On the Nobel Prize in Physics, Controversies, and Influences

1
c._y._lo
c._y._lo
2
C. Y. Lo
C. Y. Lo

Send Message

To: Author

GJSFR Volume 13 Issue A3

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

SFR42K99

On the Nobel Prize in Physics, Controversies, and Influences Banner
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

The Nobel Prizes were established by Alfred Bernhard Nobel for those who confer the “greatest benefit on mankind”, and specifically in physics, chemistry, peace, physiology or medicine, and literature. In 1968 the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences was established. However, the proceedings, nominations, awards, and exclusions have generated criticism and controversy. The controversies and influences related to the Nobel Physics Prize are discussed. The 1993 Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded to Hulse and Taylor, but the related theory was still incorrect as Gullstrand conjectured. The fact that Christodoulou received honors for related errors testified, “Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth” as Einstein asserted. The strategy based on the recognition time lag failed because of mathematical and logical errors. These errors were also the obstacles for later crucial progress. Also, it may be necessary to do follow up work after the awards years later since an awarded work may still be inadequately understood. Thus, it is suggested: 1) To implement the demands of Nobel’s will, the Nobel Committee should rectify their past errors in sciences. 2

73 Cites in Articles

References

  1. Wen Xie,Xin Xu,Ruiqi Liu,Yong Jin,Wenchao Bai,Qiang Li (1993). Living in a Simulation? An Empirical Investigation of a Smart Driving-Simulation Testing System.
  2. (1993). The Press Release of the Nobel Prize Committee.
  3. A Gullstrand (1921). Unknown Title.
  4. C Lo (1995). Einstein's Radiation Formula and Modifications to the Einstein Equation.
  5. S Editor,Chandrasekhar (2014). Appendix: Complete bibliography of Fred Sanger.
  6. C Lo (2000). On the Incompatibility of Gravitational Radiation with the 1915 Einstein Equation.
  7. C Lo (2006). The Gravitational “Plane Waves” of Liu & Zhou and the Nonexistence of Dynamic Solutions for Einstein’s Equation.
  8. C Lo (2011). Linearization of the Einstein Equation and the 1993 Press Release of the Nobel Prize in Physics.
  9. C Lo (2012). Comments on the 2011 Shaw Prize in Mathematical Sciences, an analysis of collectively formed errors in physics.
  10. C Lo (2013). Unknown Title.
  11. Sean Carroll (2003). Spacetime and Geometry.
  12. Demetrios Christodoulou,Sergiu Klainerman (1993). The Global Nonlinear Stability of the Minkowski Space (PMS-41).
  13. R Wald (1984). General Relativity.
  14. C Misner,K Thorne,J Wheeler (1973). Gravitation.
  15. Hooft (1999). A CONFONTATION WITH INFINITY.
  16. C Lo (2012). The invalid speculation of , the Reissner–Nordström metric, and Einstein's Unification Theory.
  17. C Lo (1997). Unknown Title.
  18. C Lo (2006). Bulletin of Pure and Applied Sciences- Physics.
  19. C Lo (2007). Remarks on interpretations of the Eötvös experiment and misinterpretation of <i>E</i> = <i>mc</i> <sup>2</sup>.
  20. C Lo (2010). Rectifiable Inconsistencies and Related Problems in General Relativity.
  21. Dongqiao Zhang,Jingjing Liu,Brandon Williams,Zaili Hou,Benjamin Lofink,Victor Santos,Elaina Becher,Saral Shrestha,Zain Nasir,Harsh Patel,Anthony Partyka,Xiaohong Peng,Luyi Sun (2009). Enhancing Flame Retardancy of Polyurethane Foam with Montmorillonite-Based Nanocoatings.
  22. C Lo (2009). Precession Formulas for Gravity Probe-B and its Complementary Experiment of Local Light Speeds.
  23. C Lo (2006). On Interpretations of Hubble's Law and the Bending of Light.
  24. C Lo (2003). On Criticisms of Einstein's Equivalence Principle.
  25. J Frank,Tipler (2009). Is the Physics Nobel Prize Also Becoming a Joke?.
  26. C Lo (2006). Special Relativity, Misinterpretation of E = Mc 2 , and Einstein's Theory of General Relativity.
  27. C Lo (2008). Unknown Title.
  28. A Pais (1996). Subtle is the Lord.
  29. C Lo (2000). The Question of Validity of the “Dynamic Solutions” Constructed by Christodoulou and Klainerman.
  30. Perlick Volker (1996). Unknown Title.
  31. C Lo (2006). Completing Einstein's Proof of E = mc 2.
  32. C Lo (2005). Misunderstandings Related to Einstein's Principle of Equivalence and Einstein's Theoretical Errors on Measurements..
  33. C Lo (2010). Unknown Title.
  34. S Weinberg (2000). The Quantum Theory of Fields.
  35. C Yang,R Mills (1954). Conservation of Isotopic Spin and Isotopic Gauge Invariance.
  36. Ron Shaw (1955). Ron, Prof. David, Professor of Cellular Pathophysiology and Clinical Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, since 2009; Fellow, Churchill College, Cambridge, since 2011.
  37. Zhou Pei-Yuan (1987). Further Experiments to Test Einstein's Theory of Gravitation.
  38. C Lo (2007). Einstein's Principle of Equivalence, and the Einstein-Minkowski Condition.
  39. A Whitehead (1962). SELECTION FROM THE GENERAL CATALOGUE OF BOOKS PUBLISHED BY THE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS.
  40. C Lo (2006). Unknown Title.
  41. J Whitrow (1972). Edwin Powell Hubble.
  42. J Jackson (1962). Classical Electrodynamics.
  43. K Thorne (1994). Black Holes and Time Warps.
  44. A Einstein (1922). The Meaning of Relativity.
  45. C Lo,C Wong (2006). Unknown Title.
  46. M Ph,Kanarev Errors by the Nobel Committee.
  47. C Lo (2007). Unknown Title.
  48. C Lo (2008). Limitations of Einstein's equivalence principle and the mass-charge repulsive force..
  49. P Antonyuk (2009). The special theory of relativity and the theory of physical similarity.
  50. M Duffy,V Gladyshev,A Morozov,P Rowlands -Moscow Unknown Title.
  51. G Slava,Turyshev,T Viktor,Toth (2009). Unknown Title.
  52. C Lo (2012). On the Weight Reduction of Metals due to Temperature Increments.
  53. A Einstein (1946). Experimental Hypertension: Special Publications of the New York Academy of Sciences.
  54. K Thorne (1994). Black Holes and Time Warps.
  55. W Pauli (1971). Theory of Relativity.
  56. A Einstein,H Lorentz,H Minkowski,H Weyl (1952). The Principle of Relativity.
  57. C Lo (2009). Comments on “How to become a good theoretical physicist by Gerard ‘t Hooft”.
  58. S Weinberg (1972). Gravitation and Cosmology.
  59. C Lo (1999). Compatibility with Einstein's Notion of Weak Gravity: Einstein's Equivalence Principle and the Absence of Dynamic Solutions for the 1915 Einstein Equation.
  60. A Lorentz (1900). Northern and Midland Division.
  61. C Ohanian,R Ruffini (1994). Gravitation and SpaceTime.
  62. M Born (1968). Walker, Andrew Paul Dalton, (born 22 Sept. 1968), QC 2011.
  63. A Einstein,N Rosen (1937). Unknown Title.
  64. A Einstein (1911). Über den Einfluß der Schwerkraft auf die Ausbreitung des Lichtes.
  65. Norton (1989). What was Einstein's Principle of Equivalence?.
  66. K-Y Chung,S -W. Chiow,S Herrmann,S Chu,H Müller (2009). Unknown Title.
  67. C Lo (2012). Local Lorentz Invariance and the Distortion of Einstein's Equivalence Principle.
  68. L Synge (1971). Relativity: The General Theory.
  69. C Will (1986). Was Einstein Right?.
  70. V Fock (1964). PREFACE TO SECOND EDITION.
  71. Doyle Buehler (2004). Buehler-Preis / Buehler Award.
  72. C Lo (2012). Unknown Title.
  73. Burton Richter (2006). Theory in particle physics: Theological speculation versus practical knowledge.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

c._y._lo. 2013. \u201cOn the Nobel Prize in Physics, Controversies, and Influences\u201d. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - A: Physics & Space Science GJSFR-A Volume 13 (GJSFR Volume 13 Issue A3): .

Download Citation

Issue Cover
GJSFR Volume 13 Issue A3
Pg. 59- 73
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJSFR

Print ISSN 0975-5896

e-ISSN 2249-4626

Classification
Not Found
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

April 22, 2013

Language

English

Experiance in AR

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Read in 3D

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 5017
Total Downloads: 2636
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research

Published Article

The Nobel Prizes were established by Alfred Bernhard Nobel for those who confer the “greatest benefit on mankind”, and specifically in physics, chemistry, peace, physiology or medicine, and literature. In 1968 the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences was established. However, the proceedings, nominations, awards, and exclusions have generated criticism and controversy. The controversies and influences related to the Nobel Physics Prize are discussed. The 1993 Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded to Hulse and Taylor, but the related theory was still incorrect as Gullstrand conjectured. The fact that Christodoulou received honors for related errors testified, “Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth” as Einstein asserted. The strategy based on the recognition time lag failed because of mathematical and logical errors. These errors were also the obstacles for later crucial progress. Also, it may be necessary to do follow up work after the awards years later since an awarded work may still be inadequately understood. Thus, it is suggested: 1) To implement the demands of Nobel’s will, the Nobel Committee should rectify their past errors in sciences. 2

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]
×

This Page is Under Development

We are currently updating this article page for a better experience.

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

On the Nobel Prize in Physics, Controversies, and Influences

C. Y. Lo
C. Y. Lo

Research Journals