Article Fingerprint
ReserarchID
71S2Y
Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJSFR
Print ISSN 0975-5896
e-ISSN 2249-4626
Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.
Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.
This paper attempted to assess the attitudes of students in
Advances in technology have created the potential for a new
Inclusion has become a priority on the global educational agenda,
Theory of sets (varieties) this one of the divisions of mathematics. In it they are studied the general properties sets are determined properties and characteristics, that possess what that general by property. Georg Cantor is considered the father of theory rightfully, which helped Richard Dedikind. The author of theory proposed the new concept of understanding nature of infinity, but the substantiation of theory itself is not entirely correct, which gave birth to logical contradictions both in theory itself and in those following, on its osnove. Iznachalnaya form of theory was called subsequently name naive set theory. In the indicated in the bibliography monograph daN the thorough analysis of set theory. In its time set theory it underwent rigid criticism from the side the well-known mathematicians: Henri Poincare, Luitzen Weyl and Herman Weyl and even associate of Cantor Richard Dedikind . They asserted that to Cantor all put outting themselves of mathematics, considered urgent infinity not scientific concept and this was error. Scientific disputes apropos of naive set theory it does not cease up to now. In the article possible inaccuracies and even errors in the theory of Cantor’s varieties are examined.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.
