Organizing user Search Histories

1
Ravi Kumar Yandluri
Ravi Kumar Yandluri
1 Gokaraju Rangaraju Institute of Engineering & Technology

Send Message

To: Author

GJCST Volume 13 Issue E13

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

CSTNWSKBR1G

Organizing user Search Histories Banner
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Internet userscontinuously make queries over web to obtain required information. They need information about various tasks and sub tasks for which they use search engines. Over a period of time they make plenty of related queries. Search engines save these queries and maintain user’s search histories. Users can view their search histories in chronological order. However, the search histories are not organized into related groups. In fact there is no organization made except the chronological order. Recently Hwang et al. studied the problem of organizing historical search information of users into groups dynamically. This automatic grouping of user search histories can help search engines also in various applications such as collaborative search, sessionization, query alterations, result ranking and query suggestions. They proposed various techniques to achieve this. In this paper we implemented those techniques practically using a prototype web application built in Java technologies. The experimental results revealed that the proposed application is useful to organize search histories.

21 Cites in Articles

References

  1. J Teevan,E Adar,R Jones,M Potts (2007). Information reretrieval: repeat queries in yahoo's logs.
  2. Heasoo Hwang,Hady Lauw,Alexandrosntoulas Lisegetoor (2012). Organizing User Search Histories.
  3. Rosie Jones,Kristina Klinkner (2008). Beyond the session timeout.
  4. P Boldi,F Bonchi,C Castillo,D Donato,A Gionis,S Vigna (2008). The query-flow graph: Model and applications.
  5. Broder (2002). A taxonomy of web search.
  6. D Beeferman,A Berger (2000). Agglomerative clustering of a search engine query log.
  7. R Baeza-Yates,A Tiberi (2007). Extracting semantic relations from query logs.
  8. P Anick (2003). Using terminological feedback for web search refinement: A log-based study.
  9. B Jansen,A Spink,C Blakely,S Koshman (2007). Defining a session on Web search engines: Research articles.
  10. L Catledge,J Pitkow (1995). Characterizing browsing strategies in the World-Wide Web.
  11. D He,A Goker,D Harper (2002). Combining evidence for automatic Web session identification.
  12. Rosie Jones,Fernando Diaz (2007). Temporal profiles of queries.
  13. A Montgomery,C Faloutsos (2001). Identifying Web browsing trends and patterns.
  14. H Silverstein,M Marais,M Henzinger,Moricz (1999). Analysis of a very large Web search engine query log.
  15. H Ozmutlu,F (2005). Application of automatic topic identification on Excite Web search engine data logs.
  16. T Lau,E Horvitz (1999). Patterns of search: Analyzing and modeling Web query refinement.
  17. F Radlinski,T Joachims (2005). Query chains: Learning to rank from implicit feedback.
  18. J.-R Wen,J.-Y Nie,H.-J Zhang (2002). Query clustering using user logs.
  19. Jeonghee Yi,Farzin Maghoul (2009). Query clustering using click-through graph.
  20. Eldar Sadikov,Jayant Madhavan,Lu Wang,Alon Halevy (2010). Clustering query refinements by user intent.
  21. Nick Craswell,Martin Szummer (2007). Random walks on the click graph.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

Ravi Kumar Yandluri. 1970. \u201cOrganizing user Search Histories\u201d. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology - E: Network, Web & Security GJCST-E Volume 13 (GJCST Volume 13 Issue E13): .

Download Citation

Article content is being processed or not available yet.

Issue Cover
GJCST Volume 13 Issue E13
Pg. 7- 14
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjcst

Print ISSN 0975-4350

e-ISSN 0975-4172

Classification
Not Found
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

Language

English

Experiance in AR

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Read in 3D

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 25469
Total Downloads: 11054
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research

Article in Review

Internet userscontinuously make queries over web to obtain required information. They need information about various tasks and sub tasks for which they use search engines. Over a period of time they make plenty of related queries. Search engines save these queries and maintain user’s search histories. Users can view their search histories in chronological order. However, the search histories are not organized into related groups. In fact there is no organization made except the chronological order. Recently Hwang et al. studied the problem of organizing historical search information of users into groups dynamically. This automatic grouping of user search histories can help search engines also in various applications such as collaborative search, sessionization, query alterations, result ranking and query suggestions. They proposed various techniques to achieve this. In this paper we implemented those techniques practically using a prototype web application built in Java technologies. The experimental results revealed that the proposed application is useful to organize search histories.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]
×

This Page is Under Development

We are currently updating this article page for a better experience.

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Organizing user Search Histories

Ravi Kumar Yandluri
Ravi Kumar Yandluri Gokaraju Rangaraju Institute of Engineering & Technology

Research Journals