Our Words are Never Neutral

Article ID

2AL24

Our Words are Never Neutral

Sana Nawaz
Sana Nawaz University of Sargodha
Ranawaseemashraf
Ranawaseemashraf
Umar Mushtaq
Umar Mushtaq
Rameezulhuda
Rameezulhuda
Anamnayyar
Anamnayyar
Ambarzehrasherazi
Ambarzehrasherazi
Maria Farman
Maria Farman
DOI

Abstract

The intended end of this study is to trace the connection between language and ideology and how these connections are advocated in the evaluation of spoken texts, in keeping with the Socio Cognitive Model (2002) of Van Dijk. This study is also intended to explain that the political talk shows telecast byvarious private TV channels are apparent and conducive devices of ideology and concealed contexts and meanings which are not always vivid for readers and the viewers. The researchers attempted to explore how the ideologies are portrayed in these shows through the analysis of a programme of a very popular talk show of a private television channel of Pakistan. It also suggests that these talk shows bewilder the agency of systems by using various tactics. In other words, critical text analyses reveal how these selections lead debaters to manipulate the relations of agency and power in the representation of action to create specific connotations which are not always vivid for all readers and the viewers.

The intended end of this study is to trace the connection between language and ideology and how these connections are advocated in the evaluation of spoken texts, in keeping with the Socio Cognitive Model (2002) of Van Dijk. This study is also intended to explain that the political talk shows telecast byvarious private TV channels are apparent and conducive devices of ideology and concealed contexts and meanings which are not always vivid for readers and the viewers. The researchers attempted to explore how the ideologies are portrayed in these shows through the analysis of a programme of a very popular talk show of a private television channel of Pakistan. It also suggests that these talk shows bewilder the agency of systems by using various tactics. In other words, critical text analyses reveal how these selections lead debaters to manipulate the relations of agency and power in the representation of action to create specific connotations which are not always vivid for all readers and the viewers.

Sana Nawaz
Sana Nawaz University of Sargodha
Ranawaseemashraf
Ranawaseemashraf
Umar Mushtaq
Umar Mushtaq
Rameezulhuda
Rameezulhuda
Anamnayyar
Anamnayyar
Ambarzehrasherazi
Ambarzehrasherazi
Maria Farman
Maria Farman

No Figures found in article.

Sana Nawaz. 2013. “. Global Journal of Human-Social Science – G: Linguistics & Education GJHSS-G Volume 13 (GJHSS Volume 13 Issue G3): .

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Issue Cover
GJHSS Volume 13 Issue G3
Pg. 81- 86
Classification
Not Found
Article Matrices
Total Views: 4656
Total Downloads: 2481
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research
Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Our Words are Never Neutral

Sana Nawaz
Sana Nawaz University of Sargodha
Ranawaseemashraf
Ranawaseemashraf
Umar Mushtaq
Umar Mushtaq
Rameezulhuda
Rameezulhuda
Anamnayyar
Anamnayyar
Ambarzehrasherazi
Ambarzehrasherazi
Maria Farman
Maria Farman

Research Journals