Party Defection and Sustenance of Nigerian Democracy

α
Jude Odigbo
Jude Odigbo
σ
Jaja Nwanegbo
Jaja Nwanegbo
ρ
Kingsley Nnorom
Kingsley Nnorom
α Federal University Wukari

Send Message

To: Author

Party Defection and Sustenance of Nigerian Democracy

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

23DS9

Party Defection and Sustenance of Nigerian Democracy Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Abstract

It has always been the practice in Nigeria’s unstable party democracy for people to defect to other parties with the intention to secure nominations from the party, and for a good number of them to return after elections to join the winning party to vie for positions in the government. The recent massive party defections by political gladiators in Nigeria were symbolic as it was the members of the ruling party that defected to opposition party and on a non election period. This paper examined the implications of this on democracy in Nigeria. It observed that this particular defection would help build strong opposition that would create a balance in the country’s democracy by checking the excesses of the ruling party at any time. It also noted that party defections are integral part of democratic processes. However, it argued that since the present defections are not driven by fundamental ideological consideration, there is still a tendency that the opposition would still crumble in no distant time especially if the motive (which is to stop the incumbent president) is not achieved or even after the struggle as the bond cannot be strong outside ideology. The paper relied on content analysis and adopted abstractions from elite theory. It observed that lack of ideology and internal party democracy appears to have ignited the prevailing squabbles that orchestrated the recent exodus. The paper recommended social re-engineering, reorientation and mobilization that is directed towards inculcation of new values and the essence of entrenching acceptable philosophy in Nigeria’s party system.

References

32 Cites in Article
  1. L Adejuwon (2013). Of Carpet Crossing and Old Wine in New Bottle.
  2. C Ake (2000). Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa.
  3. C Ake (2003). Democracy and Development in Africa.
  4. A Appadorai (2004). The Substance of Politics. By A. Appadorai. (New York: Oxford University Press. 1953. Pp. x, 524. $2.50.).
  5. E Awa (1991). Democracy and Governance in Africa: The Continental Perspective.
  6. L Baiyewu (2012). Defections and the Survival of Deocracy.
  7. K Barnhurst (2005). News Ideology in the Twentieth Century.
  8. T Carothers (2006). The Weakest Link: Aiding Political Parties in New Democracies.
  9. A Dahl (2000). On Democracy.
  10. L Diamond,J Hartlyn,J Linz,M Lipset (1989). Democracy in Developing Countries.
  11. Anthony Engobes (1999). FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA RESEMBLANCE, SELF-GOVERNMENT AND FOREIGN STRATEGY, 1999-2007.
  12. J Fischman,D Law (2005). What is Judicial Ideology, and How should we Measure it.
  13. John Gerring (1997). Ideology: A Definitional Analysis.
  14. R Heberle (1951). Social Movements: An Introduction to Political Sociology.
  15. T Iyare (2004). An Overview of Political Parties in Nigeria.
  16. K Janada (2009). Laws against Party Switching, Defecting, or Floor-Crossing in National Parliaments. The Legal Regulation of Political Parties.
  17. John Jost,Christopher Federico,Jaime Napier (2009). Political Ideology: Its Structure, Functions, and Elective Affinities.
  18. G King,G Benjamin (1986). The Stability of Party Identification Among US Representatives: Political Loyalty, 1789-1984.
  19. P Mbah (2011). Party Defection and Democratic Consolidation in Nigeria -1999 -2009.
  20. O Nnoli (2003). 1. Introduction.
  21. T Nokken,K Poole (2002). Congressional Party Defection in American History. Being a Paper prepared for delivery at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.
  22. J Nwanegbo,J Odigbo (2013). Democracy and Institutionalization of Poverty.
  23. P Okparaji (2010). Political Party, Defection and the Law.
  24. S Omotola (2009). Nigerian Parties and Political Ideology.
  25. E Osaghae (1992). Democracy and Its Limits.
  26. J Schumpeter (1990). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy.
  27. M Seliger (1976). Ideology and Politics.
  28. Amartya Sen (1999). Democracy as a Universal Value.
  29. J Unah (1993). Seycat pty ltd <i>v</i>. Government of Seychelles.
  30. T Van Dijk (2006). Politics, Ideology, and Discourse.
  31. S Varma (1975). Modern Political Theory.
  32. N Wanjohi (2003). Sustainability of Political Parties in Kenya.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Jude Odigbo. 2014. \u201cParty Defection and Sustenance of Nigerian Democracy\u201d. Global Journal of Human-Social Science - F: Political Science GJHSS-F Volume 14 (GJHSS Volume 14 Issue F6): .

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

November 21, 2014

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 4477
Total Downloads: 2212
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

It has always been the practice in Nigeria’s unstable party democracy for people to defect to other parties with the intention to secure nominations from the party, and for a good number of them to return after elections to join the winning party to vie for positions in the government. The recent massive party defections by political gladiators in Nigeria were symbolic as it was the members of the ruling party that defected to opposition party and on a non election period. This paper examined the implications of this on democracy in Nigeria. It observed that this particular defection would help build strong opposition that would create a balance in the country’s democracy by checking the excesses of the ruling party at any time. It also noted that party defections are integral part of democratic processes. However, it argued that since the present defections are not driven by fundamental ideological consideration, there is still a tendency that the opposition would still crumble in no distant time especially if the motive (which is to stop the incumbent president) is not achieved or even after the struggle as the bond cannot be strong outside ideology. The paper relied on content analysis and adopted abstractions from elite theory. It observed that lack of ideology and internal party democracy appears to have ignited the prevailing squabbles that orchestrated the recent exodus. The paper recommended social re-engineering, reorientation and mobilization that is directed towards inculcation of new values and the essence of entrenching acceptable philosophy in Nigeria’s party system.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Party Defection and Sustenance of Nigerian Democracy

Jude Odigbo
Jude Odigbo Federal University Wukari
Jaja Nwanegbo
Jaja Nwanegbo
Kingsley Nnorom
Kingsley Nnorom

Research Journals