Past Before Future: A Comprehensive Review on Software Defined Networks Road Map

1
Windhya Rankothge
Windhya Rankothge

Send Message

To: Author

GJCST Volume 19 Issue C1

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

CSTSDE852W4

Past Before Future: A Comprehensive Review on  Software Defined Networks Road Map Banner
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Software Defined Networking (SDN) is a paradigm that moves out the network switch’s control plane (routing protocols) from the switch and leaves only the data plane (user traffic) inside the switch. Since the control plane has been decoupled from hardware and given to a logically centralized software application called a controller; network devices become simple packet forwarding devices that can be programmed via open interfaces. The SDN’s concepts: decoupled control logic and programmable networks provide a range of benefits for management process and has gained significant attention from both academia and industry. Since the SDN field is growing very fast, it is an active research area. This review paper discusses the state of art in SDN, with a historic perspective of the field by describing the SDN paradigm, architecture and deployments in detail.

63 Cites in Articles

References

  1. J Menga (2003). Ccnp practical studies: Layer 3 switching.
  2. Hyojoon Kim,Nick Feamster (2013). Improving network management with software defined networking.
  3. (2011). OBF Redmine server now available.
  4. (2011). Annual Meeting Brings CNRU and ONRC Directors Together.
  5. N Feamster (2013). Online course host Coursera to ID students using typing style.
  6. J Lawser,R Lecronier,R Simms (1982). <i>Stored Program Controlled Network</i>: Generic Network Plan.
  7. D Tennenhouse,J Smith,El (1997). A survey of active network research.
  8. David Wetherall (1999). Active network vision and reality.
  9. J Van (1998). The tempest: A practical framework for network programmability.
  10. J Smith,D Farber (1996). Switchware: Accelerating network evolution.
  11. Beverly Schwartz,Alden Jackson,W Strayer,Wenyi Zhou,R Rockwell,Craig Partridge (2000). Smart packets.
  12. Y Yemini,S Silva (1996). Towards programmable networks.
  13. Andrew Campbell,Irene Katzela,Kazuho Miki,John Vicente (1998). Open signaling for ATM, internet and mobile networks (OPENSIG'98).
  14. Andy Bavier,Nick Feamster,Mark Huang,Larry Peterson,Jennifer Rexford (2006). In VINI veritas.
  15. Nick Feamster,Lixin Gao,Jennifer Rexford (2007). How to lease the internet in your spare time.
  16. A Doria,J Salim (2010). Forwarding and control element separation (forces) protocol specification.
  17. M Caesar,D Caldwell Design and implementation of a routing control platform.
  18. M Casado,M (2007). Ethane: Taking control of the enterprise.
  19. H Wang,Z Tsou,T,Y Analysis of comparisons between openflow and forces draft-wang-forces-compare-openflowforces.
  20. Nick Mckeown,Tom Anderson,Hari Balakrishnan,Guru Parulkar,Larry Peterson,Jennifer Rexford,Scott Shenker,Jonathan Turner (2008). OpenFlow.
  21. Thomas Limoncelli (2012). OpenFlow: A Radical New Idea in Networking.
  22. Mariano Benito,Enrique Vallejo,Ramon Beivide,Cruz Izu (2012). Extending Commodity OpenFlow Switches for Large-Scale HPC Deployments.
  23. (2013). Openflow switch specification 1.4.0.
  24. T Santhanam (2011). Cisco, Théo.
  25. Myung-Ki Shin,Ki-Hyuk Nam,Hyoung-Jun Kim (2012). Software-defined networking (SDN): A reference architecture and open APIs.
  26. M Jonathan,J David (2011). The open sdn architecture -big switch networks.
  27. Natasha Gude,Teemu Koponen,Justin Pettit,Ben Pfaff,Martín Casado,Nick Mckeown,Scott Shenker (2008). NOX.
  28. F Fernandez (2013). Comparing OpenFlow Controller Paradigms Scalability: Reactive and Proactive.
  29. S Johnson (2012). Border gateway protocol as a hybrid sdn protocol.
  30. David Erickson (2013). The beacon openflow controller.
  31. A Tootoonchian,S Gorbunov On controller performance in softwaredefined networks.
  32. Rihab Jmal,Lamia Chaari Fourati (2011). Implementing shortest path routing mechanism using Openflow POX controller.
  33. Z Cai,A Cox (2010). Maestro: A system for scalable openflow control.
  34. (2012). Trema.
  35. Amit Jaiswal (2012). DOS attack Network Traffic Monitoring in Software Defined Networking using Mininet and RYU Controller.
  36. (2011). Floodlight is an open sdn controller.
  37. N (2013). Languages for software-defined networks.
  38. Mark Reitblatt,Marco Canini,Arjun Guha,Nate Foster (2013). FatTire.
  39. Andreas Voellmy,Ashish Agarwal,Paul Hudak (2011). Nettle: Functional Reactive Programming for OpenFlow Networks.
  40. T Hinrichs,N Gude (2009). Practical declarative network management.
  41. A Voellmy,H Kim,N Feamster (2012). Procera: A language for high-level reactive network control.
  42. N Kaia,J Rexford,D Walker (2012). Logic programming for software-defined networks: Flog.
  43. C Monsanto,J Reich (2013). Composing software defined networks.
  44. M Canini,D Venzano (2012). A nice way to test openflow applications.
  45. Haohui Mai,Ahmed Khurshid,Rachit Agarwal,Matthew Caesar,P Godfrey,Samuel King (2011). Debugging the data plane with anteater.
  46. Nikhil Handigol,Brandon Heller,Vimalkumar Jeyakumar,David Maziéres,Nick Mckeown (2012). Where is the debugger for my software-defined network?.
  47. A Wundsam,D Levin (2011). Of rewind: enabling record and re-play troubleshooting for networks.
  48. Ahmed Khurshid,Wenxuan Zhou,Matthew Caesar,P Godfrey (2011). VeriFlow.
  49. (2013). Figure 2: Bland-Altman method comparing STS tele-assessment validity: (A) STS-IP and STS-S; (B) STS-IP and STS-A; and (C) STS-A and STS-SR..
  50. M Yu,L Jose,R Miao (2013). Proceedings of the second USENIX symposium on Operating systems design and implementation.
  51. Bob Lantz,Brandon Heller,Nick Mckeown (2010). A network in a laptop.
  52. T Henderson,M Lacage,G Riley (2008). Network simulations with the ns-3 simulator.
  53. (2013). Emulab -network emulation testbed home.
  54. Rob Sherwood,Michael Chan,Adam Covington,Glen Gibb,Mario Flajslik,Nikhil Handigol,Te-Yuan Huang,Peyman Kazemian,Masayoshi Kobayashi,Jad Naous,Srinivasan Seetharaman,David Underhill,Tatsuya Yabe,Kok-Kiong Yap,Yiannis Yiakoumis,Hongyi Zeng,Guido Appenzeller,Ramesh Johari,Nick Mckeown,Guru Parulkar (2008). Carving research slices out of your production networks with OpenFlow.
  55. Zdravko Bozakov,Panagiotis Papadimitriou (2012). AutoSlice.
  56. Eric Keller,Soudeh Ghorbani,Matt Caesar,Jennifer Rexford (2012). Live migration of an entire network (and its hosts).
  57. Marcelo Nascimento,Christian Rothenberg,Marcos Salvador,Carlos Corrêa,Sidney De Lucena,Maurício Magalhães (2011). Virtual routers as a service.
  58. C Rothenberg,M Nascimento (2015). Towards making network function virtualization a cloud computing service.
  59. Windhya Rankothge,Franck Le,Alessandra Russo,Jorge Lobo (2015). Experimental results on the use of genetic algorithms for scaling virtualized network functions.
  60. W Rankothge,F Le (2017). Optimizing resources allocation for virtualized network functions in a cloud center using genetic algorithms.
  61. Windhya Rankothge,Franck Le,Alessandra Russo,Jorge Lobo (2017). Optimizing Resource Allocation for Virtualized Network Functions in a Cloud Center Using Genetic Algorithms.
  62. J Ma,W Rankothge,C Makaya,C Morales,F Le,J Lobo (2018). An overview of a load balancer architecture for vnf chains horizontal scaling.
  63. J Ma,W Rankothge,C Makaya,C Morales,El A compre-hensive study on load balancers for vnf chains horizontal scaling.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

Windhya Rankothge. 2019. \u201cPast Before Future: A Comprehensive Review on Software Defined Networks Road Map\u201d. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology - C: Software & Data Engineering GJCST-C Volume 19 (GJCST Volume 19 Issue C1): .

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjcst

Print ISSN 0975-4350

e-ISSN 0975-4172

Keywords
Classification
GJCST-C Classification: H.3
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

April 16, 2019

Language

English

Experiance in AR

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Read in 3D

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 5022
Total Downloads: 1282
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research

Published Article

Software Defined Networking (SDN) is a paradigm that moves out the network switch’s control plane (routing protocols) from the switch and leaves only the data plane (user traffic) inside the switch. Since the control plane has been decoupled from hardware and given to a logically centralized software application called a controller; network devices become simple packet forwarding devices that can be programmed via open interfaces. The SDN’s concepts: decoupled control logic and programmable networks provide a range of benefits for management process and has gained significant attention from both academia and industry. Since the SDN field is growing very fast, it is an active research area. This review paper discusses the state of art in SDN, with a historic perspective of the field by describing the SDN paradigm, architecture and deployments in detail.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]
×

This Page is Under Development

We are currently updating this article page for a better experience.

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Past Before Future: A Comprehensive Review on Software Defined Networks Road Map

Windhya Rankothge
Windhya Rankothge

Research Journals