Peer Feedback in Learning a Foreign Language in Facebook

α
Albert Pilot
Albert Pilot
σ
Elham Akbari
Elham Akbari
ρ
Robert Jan Simons
Robert Jan Simons
Ѡ
Ahmad Naderi
Ahmad Naderi
α Utrecht University Utrecht University

Send Message

To: Author

Peer Feedback in Learning a Foreign Language in Facebook

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

GXNC1

Peer Feedback in Learning a Foreign Language in Facebook Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

References

56 Cites in Article
  1. E Akbari,A Pilot,P Simons (2015). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in foreign language learning through Facebook.
  2. B Bauer,L Debenedette,G Furstenberg,S Levet,S Waryn (2006). The Cultura project.
  3. Julie Belz,Celeste Kinginger (2003). Discourse Options and the Development of Pragmatic Competence by Classroom Learners of German: The Case of Address Forms.
  4. Julie Belz,Nina Vyatkina (2005). Learner Corpus Analysis and the Development of L2 Pragmatic Competence in Networked Inter-cultural Language Study: The Case of German Modal Particles.
  5. Billy Brick (2013). Social Networking Sites and Language Learning.
  6. Jean Chandler (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing.
  7. Young Cho,Kwangsu Cho (2011). Peer reviewers learn from giving comments.
  8. Kwangsu Cho,Moon-Heum Cho,Douglas Hacker (2010). Self-monitoring support for learning to write.
  9. Kwangsu Cho,Charles Macarthur (2010). Student revision with peer and expert reviewing.
  10. K Cho,C &macarthur (2011). Learning by Reviewing.
  11. R Cunningham (1992). Beyond educational psychology: Steps toward an educational semiotic.
  12. E Demirel,H Enginarlar (2007). Please say anything but yes or no: Fruitful Peer Feedback in Writing.
  13. Elif Demirel,Hüsnü Enginarlar (2016). Effects of Combined Peer-Teacher Feedback on Second Language Writing Development.
  14. Shelby Haberman (2011). USE OF E‐RATER<sup>®</sup> IN SCORING OF THE TOEFL IBT<sup>®</sup> WRITING TEST.
  15. R Ellis (2010). A framework for investigating oral and written corrective feedback.
  16. R Ellis,Y Sheen (2006). Re-examining the role of recasts in L2 acquisition.
  17. N Falchikov (2005). Improving Assessment through Student Involvement.
  18. Dana Ferris (1996). The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to truscott (1996).
  19. Dana Ferris (2006). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction.
  20. D Ferris (2010). Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA.
  21. S Gielen,E Peeters,F Dochy,P Onghena,K Struyven (2010). Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning.
  22. Z-H Han (2002). Rethinking the Role of Corrective Feedback in Communicative Language Teaching.
  23. J Hattie (2012). Visible learning for teachers: maximizing impact on learning.
  24. J Hattie,H Timperley (2007). The Power of Feedback.
  25. G Havranek (2002). When is corrective feedback most likely to succeed.
  26. B Hewitt (2000). Characteristics of interactive oral and computer-mediated peer group talk and its influence on revision.
  27. R Junco,G Heiberger,E Loken (2011). The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades.
  28. Muhammad Kabilan,Norlida Ahmad,Mohamad Abidin (2010). Facebook: An online environment for learning of English in institutions of higher education?.
  29. Lina Lee (2004). Learners' Perspectives on Networked Collaborative Interaction With Native Speakers of Spanish in the US.
  30. P Lightbown (1998). The importance of timing in focus on form.
  31. N Liu,D Carless (2006). Peer Feedback: The Learning Element of Peer Assessment.
  32. J Liu,J Hansen (2002). Peer response in second language writing classroom.
  33. S Loewen (2004). Uptake in incidental focus on form in meaning-focused ESL lessons.
  34. Roy Lyster (1998). RECASTS, REPETITION, AND AMBIGUITY IN L2 CLASSROOM DISCOURSE.
  35. Roy Lyster,Kazuya Saito (2010). ORAL FEEDBACK IN CLASSROOM SLA.
  36. A Mackey,J Goo (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis.
  37. D Nicol (2010). From Monologue to Dialogue: Improving Written Feedback in Mass Higher Education.
  38. David Nicol,Lovleen Kushwah (2011). Shifting feedback agency to students by having them write their own feedback comments.
  39. D Nicol (2013). Resituating Feedback from the Reactive to the Proactive.
  40. D Nicol,D Macfarlane-Dick (2006). Formative Assessment and Self-Regulated Learning: A Model and Seven Principles of Good Feedback Practice.
  41. David Nicol,Avril Thomson,Caroline Breslin (2014). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: a peer review perspective.
  42. C Redston,G Cunningham (2006). Face2face Intermediate Student's Book.
  43. Saeed Rezaei,Farzaneh Mozaffari,Ali Hatef (2011). Corrective Feedback in SLA: Classroom Practice and Future Directions.
  44. M Santos,S López-Serrano,R Manchón (2010). The differential effect of two types of direct written corrective feedback on noticing and uptake: Reformulation vs. error correction.
  45. Y Sheen (2004). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings.
  46. Y Sheen (2010). The role of oral and written corrective feedback in SLA.
  47. Valerie Shute (2008). Focus on Formative Feedback.
  48. M Swain (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning.
  49. K Topping (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities.
  50. J Truscott (1996). The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes.
  51. Sheng-Chau Tseng,Chin-Chung Tsai (2007). On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school computer course.
  52. Frank Tuzi (2004). The impact of e-feedback on the revisions of L2 writers in an academic writing course.
  53. Catherine Van Beuningen (2011). Focused versus Unfocused Corrective Feedback.
  54. N Van Gennip,M Segers,H Tillema (2010). Peer assessment as a collaborative learning activity: The role of interpersonal variables and conceptions.
  55. E Van Popta,M Kral,G Camp,R Martens,Simons Exploring the value of peer feedback in online learning for the provider.
  56. Lia Voerman,Paulien Meijer,Fred Korthagen,Robert Simons (2012). Types and frequencies of feedback interventions in classroom interaction in secondary education.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Albert Pilot. 2017. \u201cPeer Feedback in Learning a Foreign Language in Facebook\u201d. Global Journal of Human-Social Science - G: Linguistics & Education GJHSS-G Volume 17 (GJHSS Volume 17 Issue G2): .

Download Citation

Issue Cover
GJHSS Volume 17 Issue G2
Pg. 31- 44
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Keywords
Classification
GJHSS-G Classification: FOR Code: 209999
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

March 22, 2017

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 3565
Total Downloads: 1733
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

Abstract not found

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Peer Feedback in Learning a Foreign Language in Facebook

Elham Akbari
Elham Akbari
Robert Jan Simons
Robert Jan Simons
Albert Pilot
Albert Pilot Utrecht University
Ahmad Naderi
Ahmad Naderi

Research Journals