Perceived Credibility of Social Networking Technologies in Ugandas Institutions of Higher Learning

α
Bwiino Keefa
Bwiino Keefa
σ
Lubogoyi Bumaali
Lubogoyi Bumaali
ρ
Asst. Prof Kituyi
Asst. Prof Kituyi
α Makerere University Makerere University

Send Message

To: Author

Perceived Credibility of Social Networking Technologies in Ugandas Institutions of Higher Learning

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

6TQ1A

Perceived Credibility of Social Networking Technologies in Ugandas Institutions of Higher Learning Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

References

57 Cites in Article
  1. A Adeyanju (2015). Comparative Study of Social Media, Television and Newspapers' News Credibility.
  2. Ritu Agarwal,Jayesh Prasad (1999). Are Individual Differences Germane to the Acceptance of New Information Technologies?.
  3. S Almahamid,A Mcadams,T Kaladeh,M Al-Sa'eed (2010). The Relationship between Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, Perceived Information Quality, and Intention to use E-government.
  4. M Amin (2005). Social science research conception, methodology and analysis.
  5. Ashley Anderson,Dominique Brossard,Dietram Scheufele,Michael Xenos,Peter Ladwig (2013). The “Nasty Effect:” Online Incivility and Risk Perceptions of Emerging Technologies.
  6. Mary Boland,Alexander Rusanov,Yat So,Carlos Lopez-Jimenez,Linda Busacca,Richard Steinman,Suzanne Bakken,J Bigger,Chunhua Weng (2013). From expert-derived user needs to user-perceived ease of use and usefulness: A two-phase mixed-methods evaluation framework.
  7. B Boumarafi (2015). Social Media Use in Algerian Universities: University of Constantine 2 Case Study.
  8. K Bwiino,G Kituyi,I (2016). Perceived Ease of Use as a Predictor of Social Networking Technologies in Institutions of Higher Learning in Uganda.
  9. K Bwiino,G Kituyi,I (2016). Enhancing Social Networking Technologies Adoption through Perceived Usefulness: The Setting of Ugandan Institutions of Higher Learning.
  10. A Cameron,A Massie,C Alexander,B Stewart,R Montgomery,N Benavides,G Fleming,Segev,Dl (2013). Social media and organ donation registration: the Facebook effect.
  11. Kevin Canini,Bongwon Suh,Peter Pirolli (2011). Finding Credible Information Sources in Social Networks Based on Content and Social Structure.
  12. Carlos Castillo,Marcelo Mendoza,Barbara Poblete (2011). Information credibility on twitter.
  13. S Chaiken (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion.
  14. S Chaiken (1987). The Heuristic Model of Persuasion.
  15. (1999). Dual Process theories in Social Psychology.
  16. Weng Cheong (2002). Internet Adoption in Macao:.
  17. Shu-Chuan Chu,Yoojung Kim (2009). Determinants of consumer engagement in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites.
  18. A Daruish,A Noorhosseini,R &alishiri (2015). Perceived usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use for Adoption Technology LCC Card: Case Study Paddy Farmers East Province Guilan.
  19. F Davis (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models.
  20. Boris Delibasic,Milan Vukicevic,Milos Jovanovic,Milija Suknovic (2013). White-Box or Black-Box Decision Tree Algorithms: Which to Use in Education?.
  21. I Edogor,A Jonah,L (2015). Nigerian Users' Evaluation of Credibility of Social Media Sites.
  22. T Endsley,Y Wu,J &reep (2014). The Source of the Story: Evaluating the Credibility of Crisis Information Sources.
  23. S Hiltz,M Pfaff,L Plotnick,P Shih,A Flanagin,M Metzger (2008). Digital media and youth: unparalleled opportunity and unprecedented responsibility.
  24. John Fotis,Dimitrios Buhalis,Nicos Rossides (2011). Social Media Use and Impact during the Holiday Travel Planning Process.
  25. (2014). Freedom on the Net.
  26. J Giner,V Fernadez -M,M (2009). Framework for the analysis of executive information systems based on the perceived usefulness and the perceived ease of use.
  27. A Grover,D Stewart (2010). Five Starter Moves: LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter.
  28. M Hassan,A Ali (2014). Impact of Interface Characteristics on the Perceived Ease of Use and Perceived Usefulness of Digital Library Adoption among Post-Graduate Students in Somalia.
  29. Amy Heldman,Jessica Schindelar,James Weaver (2013). Social Media Engagement and Public Health Communication: Implications for Public Health Organizations Being Truly “Social”.
  30. E Hoffman (2009). Social media and learning environments: Shifting perspective on the locus of control in education.
  31. I Hussain,N Gulrez,S &tahirkheli (2012). Academic Use of Social Media: Practices and Problems of University Students.
  32. K Minjeong (2010). Measuring Social Media Credibility:A Study on a Measure of Blog Credibility.
  33. G Munguatosha,P Muyinda,J (2011). A social networked learning adoprion model for higher education institutions in developing countries.
  34. Stephen Newell,Ronald Goldsmith (2001). The development of a scale to measure perceived corporate credibility.
  35. J Nunnally,I Bernstein (1994). Psychometric Theory.
  36. Oyeduntan Enoch,Anorue Ifeanyi,Idowu Olajumoke,Balogun Mutairu,Lasisi Fatima,Okunbo Victor (2003). Knowledge, attitude, and behaviour towards nutrition radio programmes in mothers of children under five years with severe acute malnutrition in Northern Nigeria.
  37. N Pang (2013). Civic Action and Media Perceptions within the Wall.
  38. H Paquette (2013). Social Media as a Marketing Tool: A Literature Review.
  39. S Park (2009). An Analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model in Understanding University Students' Behavioral Intention.
  40. Chad Petersen,Kevin A. Johnston (2015). The Impact Facebook and Twitter has on the Cognitive Social Capital of University Students.
  41. R Reuben (2012). The Use of Social Media in Higher Education for Marketing and Communications: A Guide for Professionals in Higher Education.
  42. O Rory (2009). Word of Mouse: Credibility, Journalism and Emerging Social Media.
  43. J Rumayika,R Galan (2015). Challenges for Teaching and Learning Information and Communication Technology Courses in Higher Learning Institutions in Tanzania: A Review" Information and Knowledge Management.
  44. G Seth (2012). Analyzing the Effects of Social Media on the Hospitality Industry.
  45. A Shahzad,N Mosawi,A Golamdin,A Pasha,A Sheikh (2016). Third Party Recognition, Perceived Product Related Risk, and Perceived Ease of Use among the Online Consumer Trust: The Moderating Role of Internet Experience.
  46. A Surachman (2013). Analysis of the Influence of Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, Subjective Norm, Mobility, and Use Situation on Individual Intention to Use M-Library.
  47. Tony Susanto,Mohammad Aljoza (2015). Individual Acceptance of e-Government Services in a Developing Country: Dimensions of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use and the Importance of Trust and Social Influence.
  48. M Thiga,J Siror,J Githeko,K Njagi (2015). Factors Influencing the Intention to Use Location-Based Mobile Advertising among Micro-Enterprises in Kenya.
  49. Peter Tobbin (2012). Towards a model of adoption in mobile banking by the unbanked: a qualitative study.
  50. A Tondorov,S Chaiken,M Henderson (2000). Theories of Persuasion.
  51. N Uday,S Pallavia (2013). Food For Thought: Can Social Media be a Potential 'Learning Tool' for Universities?.
  52. Viswanath Venkatesh,Hillol Bala (2008). Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions.
  53. Viswanath Venkatesh,Fred Davis (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies.
  54. A Yaakop,M Anuar,K Omar,A (2012). Consumers' Perceptions and Attitudes towards Advertising on Facebook in Malaysia.
  55. T Yamane (1967). Statistics, An Introductory Analysis.
  56. C Yu (2012). Factors Affecting Individuals to Adopt Mobile Banking: Empirical Evidence from the Utaut Model.
  57. N Zanamwe,T Rupere,O Kufandirimbwa (2013). Use of Social Networking Technologies in Higher Education in Zimbabwe: A learners' perspective.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Bwiino Keefa. 2018. \u201cPerceived Credibility of Social Networking Technologies in Ugandas Institutions of Higher Learning\u201d. Global Journal of Human-Social Science - G: Linguistics & Education GJHSS-G Volume 17 (GJHSS Volume 17 Issue G10): .

Download Citation

Issue Cover
GJHSS Volume 17 Issue G10
Pg. 33- 42
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Keywords
Classification
GJHSS-G Classification: FOR Code: 130399
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

January 17, 2018

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 3117
Total Downloads: 1610
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

Abstract not found

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Perceived Credibility of Social Networking Technologies in Ugandas Institutions of Higher Learning

Bwiino Keefa
Bwiino Keefa Makerere University
Lubogoyi Bumaali
Lubogoyi Bumaali
Asst. Prof Kituyi
Asst. Prof Kituyi

Research Journals