Performance Assessment of WhatsApp and IMO on Android Operating System (Lollipop and KitKat) during VoIP Calls using 3G or WiFi

Performance Assessment of WhatsApp and IMO on Android Operating System (Lollipop and KitKat) during VoIP Calls using 3G or WiFi

R.C. De Oliveira

Contact

H.M. De Oliveira

Contact

R.A. Ramalho

Contact

L.P.S. Viana

Contact

α Amazon State University

Performance Assessment of WhatsApp and IMO on Android Operating System (Lollipop and KitKat) during VoIP Calls using 3G or WiFi

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

H28YP

Performance Assessment of WhatsApp and IMO on Android Operating System (Lollipop and KitKat) during VoIP Calls using 3G or WiFi Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

This paper assesses the performance of mobile messaging and VoIP connections. We compared the CPU requirements of WhatsApp and IMO under different scenarios. This analysis also enabled a comparison of the performance of these applications on two Android operating system (OS) versions: KitKat or Lollipop. Two models of smartphones were considered, viz. Galaxy Note 4 and Galaxy S4. The applications behavior was statistically investigated for both sending and receiving VoIP calls. Connections have been examined over 3G and WiFi. The handset model plays a decisive role in CPU requirements of the application. t-tests shown that IMO has a statistical better performance that WhatsApp whatever be the Android at a significance level 1%, on Galaxy Note 4. In contrast, WhatsApp requires less CPU than IMO on Galaxy S4 whatever be the OS and access (3G/WiFi). Galaxy Note 4 using WiFi has always better performance than S4 in terms of processing.

References

16 Cites in Article

Reference Format

M Butler (2011). Android: Changing the Mobile Land scape.
S Cherry (2002). Talk is cheap; text is cheaper [mobile messaging.
Karen Church,Rodrigo De Oliveira (2013). What's up with whatsapp?.
A Ghosh,J Zhang,J Andrews,R Muhamed (2010). Fundamentals of LTE.
(2016). Android, the world's most popular mobile platform.
T Kundu,P Kolin (2011). Improving Android Performance and energy efficiency.
Table 2 : Average CPU requirements for different scenarios.
Mario Zechner,J Dimarzio,Robert Green (2016). Android for Game Developers.
V Mattsson Instant Messaging in Mobile Phones: Changes in the user interface to enhance the user.
P Mehrotra,T Pradhan,P Jain (2014). Instant Messaging Service on Android Smart phones and Personal Computers.
Christian Montag,Konrad Błaszkiewicz,Rayna Sariyska,Bernd Lachmann,Ionut Andone,Boris Trendafilov,Mark Eibes,Alexander Markowetz (2015). Smartphone usage in the 21st century: who is active on WhatsApp?.
R Murmuria,J Medsger,A Stavrou,J Voas (2012). Mobile application and device power usage measurements.
K O'hara,P Kenton (2014). Everyday dwelling with WhatsApp.
A Saksonov (2014). Method to Derive Energy Profiles for Android Platform.
A Tanenbaum,J David (2011). Computer Network.
(2006). What causes ADHD?: understanding what goes wrong and why.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

R.C. De Oliveira. 2016. \u201cPerformance Assessment of WhatsApp and IMO on Android Operating System (Lollipop and KitKat) during VoIP Calls using 3G or WiFi\u201d. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology - A: Hardware & Computation GJCST-A Volume 16 (GJCST Volume 16 Issue A1): .

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

Download Article

GJCST Volume 16 Issue A1
Pg. 1- 6

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjcst

Print ISSN 0975-4350

e-ISSN 0975-4172

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJCST-A Classification: C.2.1, C.2.3

Submission ReceivedDecember 15, 2015
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 2, 2016
Published January 15, 2016

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

September 13, 2016

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 104

Country: Brazil

Subject: Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology - A: Hardware & Computation

Authors: R.C. De Oliveira, H.M. De Oliveira, R.A. Ramalho, L.P.S. Viana (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 301

Total Views (Real + Logic): 7406

Total Downloads (simulated): 1957

Publish Date: 2016 09, Tue

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 22 views
Month 2: 27 views
Month 3: 56 views
Month 4: 57 views
Month 5: 27 views
Month 6: 29 views
Month 7: 22 views
Month 8: 34 views
Month 9: 38 views
Month 10: 45 views
Month 11: 36 views
Month 12: 32 views
Month 13: 25 views
Month 14: 47 views
Month 15: 35 views
Month 16: 29 views
Month 17: 36 views
Month 18: 23 views
Month 19: 33 views
Month 20: 22 views
Month 21: 29 views
Month 22: 25 views
Month 23: 37 views
Month 24: 26 views
Month 25: 45 views
Month 26: 44 views
Month 27: 38 views
Month 28: 41 views
Month 29: 24 views
Month 30: 34 views
Month 31: 23 views
Month 32: 49 views
Month 33: 41 views
Month 34: 17 views
Month 35: 36 views
Month 36: 14 views
Month 37: 10 views
Month 38: 27 views
Month 39: 45 views
Month 40: 35 views
Month 41: 40 views
Month 42: 38 views
Month 43: 26 views
Month 44: 32 views
Month 45: 26 views
Month 46: 31 views
Month 47: 23 views
Month 48: 36 views
Month 49: 31 views
Month 50: 29 views
Month 51: 38 views
Month 52: 49 views
Month 53: 24 views
Month 54: 23 views
Month 55: 32 views
Month 56: 40 views
Month 57: 26 views
Month 58: 24 views
Month 59: 36 views
Month 60: 32 views
Month 61: 25 views
Month 62: 34 views
Month 63: 43 views
Month 64: 27 views
Month 65: 25 views
Month 66: 29 views
Month 67: 35 views
Month 68: 39 views
Month 69: 31 views
Month 70: 35 views
Month 71: 27 views
Month 72: 33 views
Month 73: 30 views
Month 74: 18 views
Month 75: 27 views
Month 76: 39 views
Month 77: 42 views
Month 78: 46 views
Month 79: 24 views
Month 80: 32 views
Month 81: 20 views
Month 82: 40 views
Month 83: 45 views
Month 84: 19 views
Month 85: 32 views
Month 86: 17 views
Month 87: 36 views
Month 88: 29 views
Month 89: 27 views
Month 90: 35 views
Month 91: 48 views
Month 92: 48 views
Month 93: 23 views
Month 94: 27 views
Month 95: 42 views
Month 96: 28 views
Month 97: 30 views
Month 98: 32 views
Month 99: 38 views
Month 100: 36 views
Month 101: 37 views
Month 102: 25 views
Month 103: 41 views
Month 104: 46 views
Month 105: 45 views
Month 106: 28 views
Month 107: 30 views
Month 108: 24 views
Month 109: 15 views
Month 110: 17 views
Month 111: 40 views
Month 112: 27 views
Month 113: 32 views
Month 114: 33 views
Month 115: 45 views
Month 116: 39 views

Total Views: 7406

Total Downloads: 1957

2026 Trends

Published Article

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]