Performance Evaluation of Varying Contention Window Size for Bandwidth Constrained Routing in Adhoc Networks

α
Mr. N.Sumathi
Mr. N.Sumathi
σ
Dr. Antony Selvadoss Thanamani
Dr. Antony Selvadoss Thanamani
α Bharathiar University Bharathiar University

Send Message

To: Author

Performance Evaluation of Varying Contention Window Size for Bandwidth Constrained Routing in Adhoc Networks

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

2J65S

Performance Evaluation of Varying Contention Window Size for Bandwidth Constrained Routing in Adhoc Networks Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Abstract

Providing bandwidth efficient routing in ad hoc networks is a challenging task. Available bandwidth of nodes is accurately evaluated before finding route from source to destination. Accuracy of available bandwidth is mainly affected by collision and overhead due to the execution of backoff scheme. Existing bandwidth constrained routing uses binary exponential backoff which follows serial transmission and causes unfair channel access. To overcome these, implicit pipelined backoff procedure is proposed to improve the available bandwidth and reduce the overhead associated with the backoff scheme employed in medium access control layer. In this, when two nodes are sharing the channel, the remaining nodes start the channel contention procedure in parallel to transmit next packet. Thus the channel waiting time is reduced. Each node maintains separate contention window for each phase in pipelined backoff. Proper choice of contention window size has great effect on performance of the network. This proposed algorithm is combined with a reactive link disjoint multipath routing protocol called AOMDV (Adhoc Ondemand Multipath Distance Vector) to find the best path based on bandwidth. Experimental results show that this algorithm outperforms existing approach in terms of QoS metrics such as delay, throughput, packet delivery ratio and energy consumption for different contention window sizes.

References

24 Cites in Article
  1. G Bianchi (2000). Performance analysis of the IEEE 802.11 distributed coordination function.
  2. Shan Gong (2006). Quality of Service Aware Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks.
  3. Stéphane Lohier,Sidi-Mohammed Senouci,Yacine Ghamri-Doudane,Guy Pujolle (2003). A Reactive QoS Routing Protocol for Ad Hoc Networks.
  4. Cheikh Sarr,Claude Chaudet,Guillaume Chelius,Isabelle Gue´ Rin Lassous (2008). Bandwidth Estimation for IEEE 802.11-Based Ad Hoc Networks.
  5. X Yang,N Vaidya (2002). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Materials Research Laboratory progress report for FY 1992.
  6. Vaduvur Bharghavan,Alan Demers,Scott Shenker,Lixia Zhang (1994). MACAW.
  7. H Wu,S Cheng (2002). IEEE 802.11 Distributed Coordination Function (DCF): Analysis and Enhancement.
  8. N Song,B Kwak,J Song,L Miller (2003). Enhancement of IEEE 802.11 distributed coordination function with exponential increase exponential decrease backoff algorithm.
  9. Y Kwon,Y Fang,H Latchman (2003). A novel MAC protocol with fast collision resolution for wireless LANs.
  10. J Deng,P Varshney,Z Haas (2004). A new backoff algorithm for the IEEE 802.11 distributed coordination function.
  11. Chonggang Wang,B Li,Lemin Li (2004). A New Collision Resolution Mechanism to Enhance the Performance of IEEE 802.11 DCF.
  12. Nakjung Choi,Yongho Seok,Yanghee Choi,Gowoon Lee,Sungmann Kim,Hanwook Jung (2005). P-DCF: Enhanced Backoff Scheme for the IEEE 802.11 DCF.
  13. P Chatzimisios,V Vitsas,A Boucouvalas (2005). DIDD backoff scheme: An enhancement to IEEE 802.11 DCF under burst transmission errors.
  14. Mahmoud Taifour,Farid Na®_T-Abdesselam,David Simplot-Ryl (2005). Neighbourhood Backoff Algorithm for Optimizing Bandwidth in Single Hop Wireless Ad-Hoc Networks.
  15. Marek Natkaniec,A Pach (2000). An analysis of the backoff mechanism used in IEEE 802.11 networks.
  16. Chunyu Hu,H Kim,J Hou (2005). An Analysis of the Binary Exponential Backoff Algorithm in Distributed MAC Protocols.
  17. Saher Manaseer,Mohamed Ould-Khaoua,Lewis Mackenzie (2005). On the Logarithmic Backoff Algorithm for MAC Protocol in MANETs.
  18. S-R Ye,Y-C Tseng (2006). A Multichain Backoff Mechanism for IEEE 802.11 WLANs.
  19. A Zhou,Marshall,Lee (2007). A k-round Elimination Contention Scheme for WLANs.
  20. X Yang,N Vaidya (2003). Explicit and Implicit Pipelining for Wireless Channel Access Control.
  21. Xue Yang,N Vaidya (2002). DSCR -A Wireless MAC Protocol Using Implicit Pipelining.
  22. Xue Yang,Member,N Ieee,Vaidya (2006). A Wireless MAC Protocol Using Implicit Pipelining.
  23. Mahesh Samir,R Das (2001). Ondemand Multipath Distance Vector Routing in Ad Hoc Networks.
  24. Perumal Sambasivam,Ashwin Murthy,E Belding-Royer (2004). Dynamically Adaptive Multipath Routing based on AODV.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Mr. N.Sumathi. 1970. \u201cPerformance Evaluation of Varying Contention Window Size for Bandwidth Constrained Routing in Adhoc Networks\u201d. Unknown Journal GJCST Volume 11 (GJCST Volume 11 Issue 3): .

Download Citation

Journal Specifications
Keywords
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

March 12, 2011

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 21052
Total Downloads: 10736
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

Providing bandwidth efficient routing in ad hoc networks is a challenging task. Available bandwidth of nodes is accurately evaluated before finding route from source to destination. Accuracy of available bandwidth is mainly affected by collision and overhead due to the execution of backoff scheme. Existing bandwidth constrained routing uses binary exponential backoff which follows serial transmission and causes unfair channel access. To overcome these, implicit pipelined backoff procedure is proposed to improve the available bandwidth and reduce the overhead associated with the backoff scheme employed in medium access control layer. In this, when two nodes are sharing the channel, the remaining nodes start the channel contention procedure in parallel to transmit next packet. Thus the channel waiting time is reduced. Each node maintains separate contention window for each phase in pipelined backoff. Proper choice of contention window size has great effect on performance of the network. This proposed algorithm is combined with a reactive link disjoint multipath routing protocol called AOMDV (Adhoc Ondemand Multipath Distance Vector) to find the best path based on bandwidth. Experimental results show that this algorithm outperforms existing approach in terms of QoS metrics such as delay, throughput, packet delivery ratio and energy consumption for different contention window sizes.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Performance Evaluation of Varying Contention Window Size for Bandwidth Constrained Routing in Adhoc Networks

Mr. N.Sumathi
Mr. N.Sumathi Bharathiar University
Dr. Antony Selvadoss Thanamani
Dr. Antony Selvadoss Thanamani

Research Journals