Performance Management and Employee Loyalty

1
Manish
Manish
2
Dr. Rishipal
Dr. Rishipal
1 Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Uttar Pradesh

Send Message

To: Author

GJMBR Volume 13 Issue A3

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

V2T67

Performance Management and Employee Loyalty Banner
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Present research is a comparison between the various dimensions of the performance management among the loyal and disloyal employees. A sample of 162 bank employees was selected randomly on availability basis for this research from a universe of bank employees of private and nationalized banks situated at Punjab, Haryana and National Capital Region of New Delhi. Selected employees were tested for their loyalty. On the basis of higher and lower scores of loyalty, employees were divided into two groups, each having 57 subjects. First group was consisting of the subjects who scored on the loyalty scale from 87-117 and nominated as group of disloyals. Whereas, second group was consisting of employee who scored 120-150 and this group was categorized as loyals. After formation of loyal and disloyal groups, subjects of both the groups were tested for the role in performance management. Performance Management was tested with its four major dimensions, such as “Organizational Planning”, “Decision Making”, “Effective Execution”, and “Result Producing Capability”. The mean scores for organizational planning among loyal and disloyal groups were (22.3) and (10.6) respectively. There was significant difference between the mean score values of organizational planning between the loyal and disloyal employees. The mean score values for the capability of decision making were (21.7) and (9.5) respectively. There was significant difference in the mean scores of loyal and disloyal groups. When the mean scores of third dimension i.e. effective execution of performance management for loyal and disloyal employees group were compared, they were found (20.4) and (13.2). The mean scores of loyal and disloyal group for effective execution also differ significantly.

21 Cites in Articles

References

  1. Organizational Effectiveness.
  2. Gary Cokins,John Wiley,Sons (2009). Performance Management.
  3. Taylor Rout (2009). Unknown Title.
  4. C Thomas,William Mawhinney,Redmon,Merle Carl,Johnson (2001). Handbook of Organizational Performance.
  5. C Aubrey,Daniels (1999). Bringing out the Best in People.
  6. A Geary,Alan Rummler,Brache (1995). Improving Performance: How to Manage the White Space in the Organization Chart.
  7. Aubrey Daniels (2004). Performance Management: Changing Behavior that Drives Organizational Effectiveness.
  8. Logan Zaffron,Steve,David (2009). Performance Management and Your Organization.
  9. Josiah Royce (1908). The Philosophy of Loyalty.
  10. B Howard,White (1956). Royce's Philosophy of Loyalty.
  11. Richard Mullin (2007). Josiah Royce's Philosophy of Loyalty as the Basis for Ethics.
  12. Inazō Nitobe (1975). The Duty of Loyalty.
  13. James Connor (2007). National Loyalty.
  14. Kim Dae,Jung (1999). Loyalty, Filial Piety in Changing Times.
  15. R Ewin (1992). Loyalty and Virtues.
  16. Milton Konvitz (1973). Loyalty.
  17. P Philip,Wiener (1973). Encyclopedia of the History of Ideas.
  18. C,Fred Alford (2002). 5. Implications of Whistleblower Ethics for Ethical Theory.
  19. Sydney Axinn (1997). Loyalty and the Limits of Patriotism.
  20. P Werhane,R Freeman (2002). Encyclopedic Dictionary of Business Ethics.
  21. Aubrey Dr,Daniels (2006). Performance Management: Changing Behavior That Drives.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

Manish. 2013. \u201cPerformance Management and Employee Loyalty\u201d. Global Journal of Management and Business Research - A: Administration & Management GJMBR-A Volume 13 (GJMBR Volume 13 Issue A3): .

Download Citation

Issue Cover
GJMBR Volume 13 Issue A3
Pg. 23- 26
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJMBR

Print ISSN 0975-5853

e-ISSN 2249-4588

Keywords
Classification
Not Found
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

March 6, 2013

Language

English

Experiance in AR

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Read in 3D

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 4923
Total Downloads: 2573
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research

Published Article

Present research is a comparison between the various dimensions of the performance management among the loyal and disloyal employees. A sample of 162 bank employees was selected randomly on availability basis for this research from a universe of bank employees of private and nationalized banks situated at Punjab, Haryana and National Capital Region of New Delhi. Selected employees were tested for their loyalty. On the basis of higher and lower scores of loyalty, employees were divided into two groups, each having 57 subjects. First group was consisting of the subjects who scored on the loyalty scale from 87-117 and nominated as group of disloyals. Whereas, second group was consisting of employee who scored 120-150 and this group was categorized as loyals. After formation of loyal and disloyal groups, subjects of both the groups were tested for the role in performance management. Performance Management was tested with its four major dimensions, such as “Organizational Planning”, “Decision Making”, “Effective Execution”, and “Result Producing Capability”. The mean scores for organizational planning among loyal and disloyal groups were (22.3) and (10.6) respectively. There was significant difference between the mean score values of organizational planning between the loyal and disloyal employees. The mean score values for the capability of decision making were (21.7) and (9.5) respectively. There was significant difference in the mean scores of loyal and disloyal groups. When the mean scores of third dimension i.e. effective execution of performance management for loyal and disloyal employees group were compared, they were found (20.4) and (13.2). The mean scores of loyal and disloyal group for effective execution also differ significantly.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]
×

This Page is Under Development

We are currently updating this article page for a better experience.

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Performance Management and Employee Loyalty

Dr. Rishipal
Dr. Rishipal
Manish
Manish Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Uttar Pradesh

Research Journals