Performance Management Practices in Institutions of Higher Education: An Instrument Development.

Performance Management Practices in Institutions of Higher Education: An Instrument Development.

James Kagaari R.K.

Contact

Kyambogo University

Performance Management Practices in Institutions of Higher Education: An Instrument Development.

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

HR252

Performance Management Practices in Institutions of Higher Education: An Instrument Development. Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

References

45 Cites in Article

Reference Format

Abdel Aziz,A Dixon,R Ragheb,M (2005). The contemporary performance measurement techniques in Egypt: a contingency approach.
P Allison (2003). Missing data techniques for structural equation modeling.
M Armstrong (1992). Human Resource Management: Strategy and Action.
P Barret (2006). Structural equation modelling: Adjudging model fit.
T Brown (2006). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research.
Michael Browne,Robert Cudeck (1993). Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit.
Barbara Byrne (2010). Structural Equation Modeling With AMOS.
Wynne Chin,Peter Todd (1995). On the Use, Usefulness, and Ease of Use of Structural Equation Modeling in MIS Research: A Note of Caution.
J Cohen,P Cohen,S West,L Aiken (2003). Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences.
A De Waal (2007). Is performance management applicable in developing countries?.
André De Waal (2007). Is performance management applicable in developing countries?.
R Din,M Zakaria,N Razak,M Embi,S Ariffin (2009). Meaningful Hybrid e-Training Model via POPEYE Orientation.
Yogesh Dwivedi,Jyoti Choudrie,Willem‐paul Brinkman (2006). Development of a survey instrument to examine consumer adoption of broadband.
Caroline Fisher,Cassandra Elrod,Rajiv Mehta (2011). A replication to validate and improve a measurement instrument for Deming's 14 Points.
J Hair,R Anderson,R Tatham,W Black (1998). Multivariate data analysis.
J Hair,W Black,B Babin,R Anderson (2010). Multivariate data Analysis.
A Hanley,J Meigs,K Williams,S Haffner,R Agostino,Sr (2005). Mis)use of factor analysis in the study of insulin resistance syndrome.
Arie Halachmi (2005). Performance measurement is only one way of managing performance.
Li‐tze Hu,Peter Bentler (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.
Soohyung Joo,Jee Yeon Lee (2010). Measuring the usability of academic digital libraries.
K Joreskog,D Sorbom (1993). Liseral8: Structural equation modelling with the SIMPLIS command language.
J Kagaari (2011). Performance management practices and managed performance: the moderating influence of organisational culture and climate in public universities in Uganda.
E Kane (1984). Why journal editors should encourage the replication of applied econometric research.
R Kline (1998). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling.
E Locke,G Latham (1990). A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance.
Edwin Locke,Gary Latham (2003). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey..
Edwin Locke,Gary Latham (2005). Goal Setting Theory Theory Building By Induction.
Great Minds in Management: The Process of Theory Development.
Robert Maccallum,James Austin (2000). Applications of Structural Equation Modeling in Psychological Research.
Herbert Marsh,John Balla,Roderick Mcdonald (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size..
M Mostafa (2010). Analysis of the Animosity Model of Foreign Product Purchase in Egypt 355.
J Ntayi (2011). Emotional outcomes of Ugandan SME buyer-supplier contractual conflicts.
T Raykov,G Marcoulides (2006). A First Course in Structural Equation Modelling.
Joseph Schafer,John Graham (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art..
Schermelleh-Engel,H Moosbrugger,H Muller (2003). Supplemental Material for Percentage of Variance Accounted for in Structural Equation Models: The Rediscovery of the Goodness of Fit Index.
A Segars,V Grover (1993). Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness: A confirmatory factor analysis.
C Sekhar (2007). Assessment of effectiveness of performance appraisal system: Scale development and its usage. www.mainstayin.com.
B Sridharan,H Deng,J Kirk,B Corbitt (2010). Structural equation modelling for evaluating the user perceptions of e-learning effectiveness in higher education.
Ricka Stoelting (2009). Path Models in Factor, Path, and Structural Equation Analysis.
Detmar Straub,David Gefen (2004). Validation Guidelines for IS Positivist Research.
M Teresa,G Ramirez,R Hernandez (2007). Factor structure of the perceived stress scale (PSS) in a sample for Mexico.
A Tomarken,N Waller (2003). Potential Problems with "Well Fitting.
A Vieira (2011). Interactive LISREL in Practice: Getting Started with a SIMPLIS Approach.
G Yeo,E Frederiks (2011). Cognitive and affective regulation: Validation and nomological network analysis.
R Rosenthal,R Rosnow (1984). Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

James Kagaari R.K.. 2014. \u201cPerformance Management Practices in Institutions of Higher Education: An Instrument Development.\u201d. Global Journal of Human-Social Science - A: Arts & Humanities GJHSS-A Volume 14 (GJHSS Volume 14 Issue A4): .

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

Download Article

GJHSS Volume 14 Issue A4
Pg. 1- 10

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Keywords

Institutions of higher education performance management practices Uganda

Submission ReceivedDecember 7, 2013
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 4, 2014
Published January 15, 2014

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

June 28, 2014

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 101

Country: Uganda

Subject: Global Journal of Human-Social Science - A: Arts & Humanities

Authors: James Kagaari R.K. (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 171

Total Views (Real + Logic): 4633

Total Downloads (simulated): 2324

Publish Date: 2014 06, Sat

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 19 views
Month 2: 39 views
Month 3: 51 views
Month 4: 31 views
Month 5: 35 views
Month 6: 38 views
Month 7: 41 views
Month 8: 29 views
Month 9: 16 views
Month 10: 48 views
Month 11: 41 views
Month 12: 31 views
Month 13: 28 views
Month 14: 36 views
Month 15: 43 views
Month 16: 25 views
Month 17: 30 views
Month 18: 34 views
Month 19: 17 views
Month 20: 34 views
Month 21: 40 views
Month 22: 32 views
Month 23: 45 views
Month 24: 37 views
Month 25: 31 views
Month 26: 16 views
Month 27: 27 views
Month 28: 35 views
Month 29: 26 views
Month 30: 26 views
Month 31: 30 views
Month 32: 25 views
Month 33: 34 views
Month 34: 31 views
Month 35: 34 views
Month 36: 44 views
Month 37: 29 views
Month 38: 29 views
Month 39: 21 views
Month 40: 32 views
Month 41: 39 views
Month 42: 42 views
Month 43: 10 views
Month 44: 21 views
Month 45: 38 views
Month 46: 30 views
Month 47: 36 views
Month 48: 37 views
Month 49: 21 views
Month 50: 27 views
Month 51: 21 views
Month 52: 29 views
Month 53: 15 views
Month 54: 39 views
Month 55: 24 views
Month 56: 25 views
Month 57: 30 views
Month 58: 25 views
Month 59: 35 views
Month 60: 45 views
Month 61: 27 views
Month 62: 49 views
Month 63: 33 views
Month 64: 42 views
Month 65: 19 views
Month 66: 18 views
Month 67: 48 views
Month 68: 34 views
Month 69: 38 views
Month 70: 24 views
Month 71: 31 views
Month 72: 19 views
Month 73: 37 views
Month 74: 13 views
Month 75: 43 views
Month 76: 39 views
Month 77: 25 views
Month 78: 24 views
Month 79: 18 views
Month 80: 22 views
Month 81: 37 views
Month 82: 40 views
Month 83: 34 views
Month 84: 17 views
Month 85: 37 views
Month 86: 22 views
Month 87: 36 views
Month 88: 40 views
Month 89: 34 views
Month 90: 29 views
Month 91: 35 views
Month 92: 39 views
Month 93: 30 views
Month 94: 36 views
Month 95: 38 views
Month 96: 28 views
Month 97: 40 views
Month 98: 26 views
Month 99: 31 views
Month 100: 17 views
Month 101: 26 views
Month 102: 34 views
Month 103: 24 views
Month 104: 20 views
Month 105: 23 views
Month 106: 15 views
Month 107: 30 views
Month 108: 36 views
Month 109: 13 views
Month 110: 23 views
Month 111: 27 views
Month 112: 32 views
Month 113: 42 views
Month 114: 50 views
Month 115: 22 views
Month 116: 23 views
Month 117: 42 views
Month 118: 26 views
Month 119: 15 views
Month 120: 29 views
Month 121: 33 views
Month 122: 27 views
Month 123: 30 views
Month 124: 30 views
Month 125: 47 views
Month 126: 30 views
Month 127: 44 views
Month 128: 35 views
Month 129: 25 views
Month 130: 15 views
Month 131: 41 views
Month 132: 30 views
Month 133: 37 views
Month 134: 26 views
Month 135: 37 views
Month 136: 21 views
Month 137: 56 views
Month 138: 35 views
Month 139: 46 views
Month 140: 50 views
Month 141: 61 views
Month 142: 55 views
Month 143: 32 views

Total Views: 4633

Total Downloads: 2324

2026 Trends

Published Article

Abstract not found

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]