Performance of Conventional and Islamic Banks

Performance of Conventional and Islamic Banks

Ahmad Alharbi

Contact

Ministry of Economy and Planning

Performance of Conventional and Islamic Banks

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

C: FINANCEI9R2V

Performance of Conventional and Islamic Banks Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

This paper investigates the differences in mean cost, revenue, and profit efficiency of conventional and Islamic banks based on size and location by using three sets of samples over the 1992-2007period from 54 countries. The study uses financial ratio analysis. The results showed that Islamic banks in both samples are more cost efficient than the conventional banks. While, the results of revenue efficiency (ROAE) ratio reveal that conventional banks are more profitable. However, the results of profit efficiency were inclusive.

References

23 Cites in Article

Reference Format

M Abdul-Majid (2010). The Input Requirements of Conventional and Shariahcompliant Banking.
Mariani Abdul-Majid,David Saal,Giuliana Battisti (2010). Efficiency in Islamic and conventional banking: an international comparison.
W Akhter,A Raza,& Orangzab,M Akram (2011). Efficiency and performance of Islamic banking: the case of Pakistan.
Mohamed Ariff,Mohammad Badar,Shamsher Mohammad,Taufiq Hassan (2011). Performance of Islamic Banks and Conventional Banks.
R Ariss (2010). Competitive conditions in Islamic and conventional banking: a global perspective.
M Bader,M Shamsher,M Ariff,H Taufiq (2007). Cost, revenue, and profit efficiency of Islamic versus conventional banks: international evidence using financial ratios approach.
S Borkbh (2011). Assessing the operational efficiency of Islamic banks: an empirical study.
T Beck,A Demirgüç-Kunt,O Merrouche (2010). Islamic vs. conventional banking: business model, efficiency and stability.
Khawla Bourkhis,Mahmoud Nabi (2011). Islamic and conventional banks' soundness during the 2007–2008 financial crisis.
Kung Chen,Thomas Shimerda (1981). An Empirical Analysis of Useful Financial Ratios.
G Halkos,D Salamouris (2004). Efficiency measurement of the Greek commercial banks with the use of financial ratios: a data envelopment analysis approach.
M Hanif,M Tariq,Tahir,W Momeneen (2012). Comparative performance study of conventional and Islamic banks in Pakistan.
K Hassan (2005). The cost, profit and x-efficiency of Islamic banks.
M Hasan,J Dridi (2010). The effects of the global crisis on Islamic and conventional banks: a comparative study.
T Hassan,Mohamad,S & Bader,M (2009). Efficiency of conventional versus Islamic banks: evidence from the Middle East.
M Iqbal (2001). Islamic and conventional banking in the nineties: a comparative study.
J Johnes,M & Izzeldin,V Pappas (2009). The efficiency of Islamic and conventional banks in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries: an analysis using financial ratios and data envelopment analysis.
T Kaouther,Viviani,L Belkacem (2011). A comparison of leverage and profitability of Islamic and conventional banks.
R Masruki,Ibrahim Osman,E & Wahab,H (2011). Financial performance of Malaysian founder Islamic banks versus conventional banks.
M Metwally (1997). Differences between the financial characteristics of interest-free banks and conventional banks.
H Mokhtar,N & Abdullah,S Al-Habshi (2006). Efficiency of Islamic banking in Malaysia: a stochastic frontier approach.
M O'connor (1973). On the usefulness of financial ratios to investors in common stock.
Dennis Olson,Taisier Zoubi (2008). Using accounting ratios to distinguish between Islamic and conventional banks in the GCC region.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Ahmad Alharbi. 2016. \u201cPerformance of Conventional and Islamic Banks\u201d. Global Journal of Management and Business Research - C: Finance GJMBR-C Volume 16 (GJMBR Volume 16 Issue C1).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJMBR Volume 16 Issue C1

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJMBR

Print ISSN 0975-5853

e-ISSN 2249-4588

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJMBR-C Classification JEL Code: G21

Submission ReceivedDecember 11, 2015
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 3, 2016
Published January 15, 2016

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

February 9, 2016

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 121

Country: Saudi Arabia

Subject: Global Journal of Management and Business Research - C: Finance

Authors: Ahmad Alharbi (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 167

Total Views (Real + Logic): 4045

Total Downloads (simulated): 2057

Publish Date: 2016 02, Tue

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 34 views
Month 2: 58 views
Month 3: 35 views
Month 4: 60 views
Month 5: 34 views
Month 6: 38 views
Month 7: 24 views
Month 8: 48 views
Month 9: 48 views
Month 10: 23 views
Month 11: 50 views
Month 12: 29 views
Month 13: 28 views
Month 14: 25 views
Month 15: 14 views
Month 16: 31 views
Month 17: 47 views
Month 18: 38 views
Month 19: 25 views
Month 20: 25 views
Month 21: 23 views
Month 22: 33 views
Month 23: 16 views
Month 24: 27 views
Month 25: 23 views
Month 26: 24 views
Month 27: 40 views
Month 28: 13 views
Month 29: 17 views
Month 30: 43 views
Month 31: 39 views
Month 32: 16 views
Month 33: 27 views
Month 34: 39 views
Month 35: 35 views
Month 36: 45 views
Month 37: 40 views
Month 38: 39 views
Month 39: 40 views
Month 40: 31 views
Month 41: 31 views
Month 42: 34 views
Month 43: 34 views
Month 44: 16 views
Month 45: 43 views
Month 46: 17 views
Month 47: 33 views
Month 48: 32 views
Month 49: 38 views
Month 50: 21 views
Month 51: 38 views
Month 52: 17 views
Month 53: 30 views
Month 54: 27 views
Month 55: 36 views
Month 56: 19 views
Month 57: 19 views
Month 58: 31 views
Month 59: 20 views
Month 60: 26 views
Month 61: 34 views
Month 62: 42 views
Month 63: 33 views
Month 64: 42 views
Month 65: 42 views
Month 66: 28 views
Month 67: 26 views
Month 68: 33 views
Month 69: 39 views
Month 70: 37 views
Month 71: 17 views
Month 72: 17 views
Month 73: 32 views
Month 74: 31 views
Month 75: 24 views
Month 76: 37 views
Month 77: 19 views
Month 78: 29 views
Month 79: 30 views
Month 80: 32 views
Month 81: 50 views
Month 82: 28 views
Month 83: 19 views
Month 84: 34 views
Month 85: 31 views
Month 86: 34 views
Month 87: 39 views
Month 88: 14 views
Month 89: 21 views
Month 90: 38 views
Month 91: 15 views
Month 92: 31 views
Month 93: 34 views
Month 94: 39 views
Month 95: 34 views
Month 96: 23 views
Month 97: 41 views
Month 98: 26 views
Month 99: 23 views
Month 100: 45 views
Month 101: 37 views
Month 102: 23 views
Month 103: 38 views
Month 104: 36 views
Month 105: 21 views
Month 106: 32 views
Month 107: 20 views
Month 108: 40 views
Month 109: 36 views
Month 110: 31 views
Month 111: 26 views
Month 112: 43 views
Month 113: 25 views
Month 114: 27 views
Month 115: 27 views
Month 116: 32 views
Month 117: 22 views
Month 118: 41 views
Month 119: 34 views
Month 120: 46 views
Month 121: 47 views
Month 122: 52 views
Month 123: 40 views
Month 124: 20 views

Total Views: 4045

Total Downloads: 2057

2026 Trends

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]