Personality Predictors of Polychronicity among Young Adults

1
Angana Bhattacharyya
Angana Bhattacharyya
2
A. Suresh
A. Suresh
3
Joan Tirzah Selvaraj
Joan Tirzah Selvaraj
1 Defence Institute of Psychological Research, DRDO

Send Message

To: Author

GJHSS Volume 15 Issue A2

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

6F775

Personality Predictors of Polychronicity among Young Adults Banner
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Researchers are increasing their attention to the multitasking demands of current organizational settings and focusing on the Time-use related values and strengths of individuals. Several researches have been carried out to explore and examine the dimension of polychronicity in this perspective. Polychronicity is the attitude and preferences associated with time use and it has been identified as a critical competency in organizing various life domains. However, there has been substantial ambiguity existing in the literature and empirical researches regarding psychological predictors of polychronicity. The incongruent conceptualization of the construct might have revealed contradictory results in several studies across the globe. The present study conceptualized polychronicity as an individual difference construct and explored the personality predictors of polychronicity among 902 young adults. By using a cross sectional, descriptive design the participants were administered HEXACO-Personality Inventory, Sensory Sensitivity scale (FCB-TI) and Multitasking Preference Inventory (MPI). Correlational analysis and Hierarchical regression was used to analyze the data. Results revealed that Polychronicity was significantly related to Personality and Sensory Sensitivity. The results of hierarchical regression showed that Sensory Sensitivity, Conscientiousness and Extraversion as significant predictors of polychronicity among young adults.

52 Cites in Articles

References

  1. A Arndt,T Arnold,T Landry (2006). The effects of polychromic-orientation upon retail employee satisfaction and turnover.
  2. J Arndt,S Gronmo,D Hawes (1981). The Use of Time as an Expression of Life-style: A Crossnational Study.
  3. Michael Ashton,Kibeom Lee (2009). The HEXACO-60: A Short Measure of the Major Dimensions of Personality.
  4. M Barrick,M Mount (1991). The big five personality dimensions and jobperformance: A meta-analysis.
  5. G Becker (1965). A Theory of the Allocation of Time.
  6. Charles Benabou (1999). Polychronicity and temporal dimensions of work in learning organizations.
  7. Allen Bluedorn (1998). An Interview with Anthropologist Edward T. Hall.
  8. Allen Bluedorn,Thomas Kalliath,Michael Strube,Gregg Martin (1999). Polychronicity and the Inventory of Polychronic Values (IPV).
  9. Allen Bluedorn,Carol Kaufman,Paul Lane (1992). How many things do you like to do at once? An introduction to monochronic and polychronic time.
  10. Allen Bluedorn,Robert Denhardt (1988). Time and Organizations.
  11. M Bühner,C König,M Pick,S Krumm (2006). Working memory dimensions as differential predictors of the speed and error aspect of multitasking performance.
  12. S Carlson (1951). Executive behavior: A study of the workload and working methods of managing directors.
  13. S Carraher,C Scott,Iii,S Carraher (2004). A comparison of polychronicity levelsamong small business owners and non business owners in the U.S., China, Ukraine, Poland, Hungary, Bulgaria, and Mexico.
  14. Jeffrey Conte,Jeremy Gintoft (2005). Polychronicity, Big Five Personality Dimensions, and Sales Performance.
  15. Jeffrey Conte,Rick Jacobs (2003). Validity Evidence Linking Polychronicity and Big Five Personality Dimensions to Absence, Lateness, and Supervisory Performance Ratings.
  16. J Conte,T Rizzuto,D Steiner (1999). A construct-oriented analysis of individual-level polychronicity.
  17. J Cotte,S Ratneshwar (1999). Juggling and hopping: What does it mean to workpolychronically.
  18. cultures.
  19. H Eysenck (1967). The biological basis of personality.
  20. Leon Festinger (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance.
  21. M Friedman,R Rosenman (1974). Type A behavior and your heart.
  22. D Fruehstorfer (2010). Predicting health-related outcomes with The Formal Characteristics of Behavior -Temperament Inventory (FCB-TI): Exploring Interactions of FCB-TI Traits.
  23. D Fruehstorfer (2005). The formal characteristics of behavior temperament inventory (FCB-TI): American English version validity and use in predicting stress and health outcomes.
  24. Victor González,Gloria Mark (2005). Managing Currents of Work: Multi-tasking Among Multiple Collaborations.
  25. R Graham (1981). The Role of Perception of Time in Consumer Research.
  26. Robert Graham (1981). The Role of Perception of Time in Consumer Research.
  27. Reuben Gronau (1977). Leisure, Home Production, and Work--the Theory of the Allocation of Time Revisited.
  28. R Haase,D Lee,D Banks (1979). Cognitive correlates of polychronicity.
  29. E Hall (1959). The silent language.
  30. E Hall,M Hall (1990). Book Reviews: Understanding Cultural Differences: Germans, French, and Americans. Edward T. Hall and Mildred Reed Hall. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press, 1990. Hardback. 196 pages. ISBN 0- 933662-84-X: Management in Two Cultures: Bridging the Gap Between U.S. and Mexican Managers. Eva S. Kras. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press, 1989. Paperback. 98 pages. ISBN 0-933662-73-4.
  31. Tracy Hecht,Natalie Allen (2005). Exploring links between polychronicity and well-being from the perspective of person–job fit: Does it matter if you prefer to do only one thing at a time?.
  32. M Hill (1985). Patterns of Time Use.
  33. E Hirschman (1987). Research in Consumer Behavior.
  34. J Hornik (1984). Subjective vs. Objective Time Measures: A Note on the Perception of Time in Consumer Behavior.
  35. Jacob Hornik (1984). Subjective vs. Objective Time Measures: A Note on the Perception of Time in Consumer Behavior.
  36. K Ishizaka,S Marshall,J Conte (2001). Individual differences in attentionalstrategies in multitasking situations.
  37. J Jacoby,G Szybillo,C Berning (1976). Time and consumer behavior: aninterdisciplinary overview.
  38. Tracy Kantrowitz,Darrin Grelle,James Beaty,Mark Wolf (2012). Time Is Money: Polychronicity as a Predictor of Performance Across Job Levels.
  39. C Kaufman,P Lane,J Lindquist (1991). Exploring more than 24 hours aday: A preliminary investigation of polychronic time use.
  40. C König,M Waller,J Arndt (1981). The use of time as an expression of life-style: crossnational study.
  41. Cornelius Konig,Markus Buhner,Gesine Murling (2005). Working Memory, Fluid Intelligence, and Attention Are Predictors of Multitasking Performance, but Polychronicity and Extraversion Are Not.
  42. L Kurke,H Aldrich (1983). Mintzberg was right!: A replication and extension of thenature of managerial work.
  43. J Lindquist,J Knieling,C Kaufman-Scarborough (2001). Polychronicity and consumer behavior outcomes among Japanese and U.S. students: A study of response toculture in a U.S. university setting.
  44. Gerald Matthews,D Davies,Jackie Lees (1990). Arousal, extraversion, and individual differences in resource availability..
  45. G Matthews,D Jones,A Chamberlain (1989). Interactive effects of extraversion and arousal on attentional task performance: Multiple resources or encoding processes.
  46. N Merkulova (2007). Selbstunterbrechungen am Arbeitsplatz: Einflüsse von Eigenschaften derrbeitstätigkeit, des Arbeitsprozesses und der arbeitenden Person [Self-interruptions atwork: Influences of work aspects, of process aspects, and of the working individual.
  47. K Moustafa,R Bhagat,E Babakus (2005). A cross-cultural investigation ofpolychronicity: A study of organizations in three countries.
  48. B Newberry,J Jaikins-Madden,T Gerstenberger (1991). A holistic conceptualization of stress and disease.
  49. B Newberry,W Clark,R Crawford,J Strelau,A Angleitner,J Hollinger Jones,A Eliasz (1997). An American English version of the Pavlovian temperament survey.
  50. Marina Onken (1999). Temporal elements of organizational culture and impact on firm performance.
  51. Titus Oshagbemi (1995). Management development and managers′ use of their time.
  52. F Oswald,D Hambrick,L Jones (2007). Keeping all the plates spinning.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

Angana Bhattacharyya. 2015. \u201cPersonality Predictors of Polychronicity among Young Adults\u201d. Global Journal of Human-Social Science - A: Arts & Humanities GJHSS-A Volume 15 (GJHSS Volume 15 Issue A2): .

Download Citation

Issue Cover
GJHSS Volume 15 Issue A2
Pg. 43- 51
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Keywords
Classification
GJHSS-A Classification: FOR Code: 170199
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

March 19, 2015

Language

English

Experiance in AR

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Read in 3D

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 4379
Total Downloads: 2174
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research

Published Article

Researchers are increasing their attention to the multitasking demands of current organizational settings and focusing on the Time-use related values and strengths of individuals. Several researches have been carried out to explore and examine the dimension of polychronicity in this perspective. Polychronicity is the attitude and preferences associated with time use and it has been identified as a critical competency in organizing various life domains. However, there has been substantial ambiguity existing in the literature and empirical researches regarding psychological predictors of polychronicity. The incongruent conceptualization of the construct might have revealed contradictory results in several studies across the globe. The present study conceptualized polychronicity as an individual difference construct and explored the personality predictors of polychronicity among 902 young adults. By using a cross sectional, descriptive design the participants were administered HEXACO-Personality Inventory, Sensory Sensitivity scale (FCB-TI) and Multitasking Preference Inventory (MPI). Correlational analysis and Hierarchical regression was used to analyze the data. Results revealed that Polychronicity was significantly related to Personality and Sensory Sensitivity. The results of hierarchical regression showed that Sensory Sensitivity, Conscientiousness and Extraversion as significant predictors of polychronicity among young adults.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]
×

This Page is Under Development

We are currently updating this article page for a better experience.

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Personality Predictors of Polychronicity among Young Adults

Angana Bhattacharyya
Angana Bhattacharyya Defence Institute of Psychological Research, DRDO
A. Suresh
A. Suresh
Joan Tirzah Selvaraj
Joan Tirzah Selvaraj

Research Journals